Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Posts Tagged ‘Main Stream Media’

Sabotage- [sabuh-tahzh, sab-uhtahzh] http://www.essence.com/news_entertainment/news/articles/alankeyesobama

1. any underhand interference with production, work, etc., in a plant, factory, etc., as by enemy agents during wartime or by employees during a trade dispute.
2. any undermining of a cause.

–verb (used with object)

3. to injure or attack by sabotage.

from http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/Sabotaged

Make no mistake, Obama as President Elect needs to show his authentic, verifiable birth certificate and to not do so is an utterly and complete disgrace and sabotage of our U.S. Constitution.   America herself should be proud to move past racism in electing a black man.  There should be no praise for a man who can not move past the fact that some of those same people who elected him are now questioning his authority and qualifications under Article II, Section I that defines who may hold the office of President. 

No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.

What an embarrassment for our country to have let the issue of his citizenship and eligibility as President elect to have gotten this far .  The rest of the world must be snickering albeit silently, that the man they will have to deal with on international matters could be so manipulative to have deceived his own people to achieve his own goals of reform and change.  What other methods of deceit may come from an Obama administration?  

Denying his citizenship to the same people who propped him up is a slap in the face that will leave America stinging for years if we find out he is not a qualified U.S. Citizen.

In an interview with Essence Magazine http://www.essence.com/news_entertainment/news/articles/alankeyesobama former Presidential Candidate Alan Keyes discusses his lawsuit challenging Obama’s citizenship -KEYES: “I think politics is irrelevant to this, actually. I don’t see how it is showing fondness for Barack Obama to let him enter into office with a question that could be raised. He should not have to operate under that burden. I think the officials need to clear the air for his sake. From my point of view, it is a bad idea to have a president of the United States enter office with a cloud hanging over his head, where every time he tries to do something, he would end up frittering away time because of that objection. So let’s get it over with. Let’s resolve it and move forward with a clear an undisturbed mandate for the new president.”

Get it over with and move forward indeed.  Rather than Obama being a stand up guy, he himself has chosen to not show his authentic birth certificate.  In filing similar applications in all 50 states he, Barack Obama on his Rhode Island application states and “declares that he is eligible under the laws and Constitution of The United States to serve in the Office of The President of The United States if elected…”  http://steadyhabits.wordpress.com/2008/11/29/ct-sec-of-state-errs-hawaii-officials-did-not-verify-obama-birthplace/#comment-506 

[…] From Obama own website:
Since Sen. Obama has neither renounced his U.S. citizenship nor
sworn an oath of allegiance to Kenya, his Kenyan citizenship
automatically expired on Aug. 4,1982.”
Question?
How could it expire, if he never had it? [END]  http://wwwwakeupamericans-spree.blogspot.com/2008/11/obama-awol-birth-certificate-update.html 

This week on Dec 5, 2008- the Supreme Court will go into conference on Leo Donofrio vs Nina Mitchell Wells, Secretary of State of New Jersey, docket 08A47.  Donofrio, a retired poker player has put all his chips and gone all in to seek the truth of where Obama’s citizenship originated. I would send you to Donofrio’s website but the original at Word Press crashed and a second mirror site set up last week at www.naturalborncitizen.blogspot.com  reads “This blog is currently under review due to possible Blogger Terms of Service violations.  If you’re a regular reader of this blog and are confident that the content is appropriate, feel free to click “Proceed” to proceed to the blog. We apologize for the inconvenience.  You can see the docket at http://www.filesend.net/download.php?f=6873f11034a973b2eaff4a8fde87408e

I’d say it is an inconvenience indeed when your 1st Amendment rights keep getting slammed.  A universal avoidance of the mainstream media on this issue is suspect but shutting the doors to a simple blog is unequivocally, a loss for free speech.  I’d also say it is more than an inconvenience to have a President Elect Obama refuse to produce his birth certificate.

Shame on Obama and shame on the DNC and the RNC for allowing it to get this far. 

Whomever Obama is, I would add coward to the list.

Read Full Post »

Andy Martin isn’t done with Obama just yet.  He has filed another motion to the courts in Hawaii seeking Obama’s birth certificate.

MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF COURT’S

ORDER OF NOVEMBER 19, 2008

 

Preliminary Statement

The Court managed to take what is at its core a simple and straightforward case seeking review of denial of access to a Hawai’i record, and to add layers of confusion and complexity that were totally unwarranted by the record made in open court on November 18th. For the reasons that follow, Plaintiff moves the Court to reconsider, vacate and rehear the matters decided on November 19th using the correct procedures and standards of law.

Plaintiff initially thought that he would appeal the order to the Intermediate Court of Appeals, but it would be a disservice to that Court to appeal such a mangled and needlessly confused record from the trial forum. Thus, the Rule 59 motion (see below) stays any appeal until a decision on this motion.

 

Plaintiff is not aware if a judgment has been entered since he has not been served with any such document. Prior to entry of a judgment a Court has plenary power to review and reconsider an order.  http://www.contrariancommentary.com/community/Home/tabid/36/mid/363/newsid363/320/Default.aspx

 

Martin claims he did not get a judgment from the court? What? Hawaii Circuit Court Judge Bert Ayabe has dismissed Internet author Andy Martin’s lawsuit seeking to obtain a copy of President-elect Barack Obama’s Hawaii’i birth certificate.  The judge upheld arguments from Gov. Linda Lingle’s administration that Martin — a political opponent of Obama — had no standing under state law to obtain a copy of the document.  reported in http://www.honoluluadvertiser.com/article/20081121/NEWS20/811210355/1001/localnewsfront and previously written about here https://ahrcanum.wordpress.com/2008/11/21/obamas-birth-certificate-denied-to-andy-martin-again/

Whatever opinion you have about Andy Martin, one must admire his tenaciousness in seeking out the truth about Obama’s birth certificate and citizenship eligibility for the office of President. 

Read Full Post »

Obama’s Birth Certificate Denied to Andy Martin AGAIN

Game on.  Obama’s Birth Certificate vs Current Court Proceedings. Last inning, bottom of the ninth.  Only two batters to go as Andy Martin has struck out. Berg and Donofrio are up next at SCOTUS.

Hawaii Circuit Court Judge Bert Ayabe has dismissed Internet author Andy Martin’s lawsuit seeking to obtain a copy of President-elect Barack Obama’s Hawai’i birth certificate.  The judge upheld arguments from Gov. Linda Lingle’s administration that Martin — a political opponent of Obama — had no standing under state law to obtain a copy of the document.

Martin “does not have a direct and tangible interest in the vital statistic records being sought, namely the birth certificate of President Obama,” Ayabe wrote.

He cited Martin’s “lack of standing” and also ruled that Martin never legally served Lingle and state Health Department director Dr. Chiyome Fukino with a copy of the legal complaint.  What a faux pau. http://www.honoluluadvertiser.com/article/20081121/NEWS20/811210355/1001/localnewsfront

Andy Martin says, ‘Our great national tantrum is over; our great national nightmare is just beginning.’His columns are also posted at www.ContrarianCommentary.blogspot.com; www.contrariancommentary.wordpress.com. Martin is the author of Obama: The Man Behind The Mask, published in July 2008, see www.OrangeStatePress.com. Martin goes further to say “it’s time for the Republican Party to slim down its playbook, and concentrate on the vital issues where Barack Obama is likely to stumble over the next two years. Martin calls for al “all-American Republican Party” for “all-Americans” with every American welcome and “no outcasts.”

Berg and Donofrio are up next to bat for the request for Obama’s long form, vaulted birth certificate and question of eligibility.  Berg v Obama and Donofrio v Wells are floating around SCOTUS. A Dec 1 deadline for Berg and a Dec 5 conference scheduled for the Donofrio case.  For a background on these cases visit https://ahrcanum.wordpress.com/2008/11/20/obamas-birth-certificate-and-citizenship-goes-to-conference-at-supreme-court/ .

The pitch hitter in this Obamagate game of deception may be former Presidential Candidate, Alan Keyes who joined the fight to release President-elect Barack Obama’s birth certificate this week, suing to keep the California Electoral College from meeting. http://www.thebulletin.us/site/index.cfm?newsid=20202575&BRD=2737&PAG=461&dept_id=576361&rfi=8  The writ of mandamus can be found here http://www.tomshakely.com/bulletin/final_writ_keyes_v_bowen.pdf.  What is Keyes motive for the filing?  Truth or Revenge?  Is Keyes a sore loser remembering that in 2004, he lost his bid for a U.S. Senate seat in Illinois to none other than Barack Obama?

To date the evidence as provided by Obama seems compelling.  That— the President-Elect was born in the Kapi’olani Medical Center for Women and Children, in Honolulu, Hawaii, on Aug. 4, 1961- Hawaii was a state at that time. Sen. Obama’s mother, Ann Dunham, who died in 1995, was an American by birth. She was from Wichita, Kansas. His [sic- alleged] dad, Barack Obama, Sr., was from Kenya. His parents divorced in 1964. In 1967, Obama moved to Indonesia with his stepfather, Lolo Soetoro and his mother. In 1971, he returned to Hawaii, to live with his grandparents, Madelyn and Stanley Dunham, who raised him. Obama’s father died in 1982.  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barack_Obama#Early_life_and_career  Sounds all good and true doesn’t it?  Oops- we we can’t verify where he was born exactly, nor his citizenship because he will not produce his birth certificate and is wasting the courts precious time by not doing so. 

Not being able to verify his citizenship means we can not verify his qualification of eligibility for President.  Article II, Section 1 of The U.S. Constitution- “No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President…”   Today’s post from Citizen Wells “Electoral College facts, Obama not eligible, Electors must vote per US Constitution, Faithless Electors, Federal Election Laws, State Laws, Elector pledges, States and Electors must uphold US Constitution”  http://citizenwells.wordpress.com/2008/11/21/electoral-college-facts-obama-not-eligible-electors-must-vote-per-us-constitution-faithless-electors-federal-election-laws-state-laws-elector-pledges-states-and-electors-must-uphold-us-constitu/ is an awesome display of what not producing a birth certificate, and verifying your eligibility can cause. 

Martin may have struck out after a fairly valiant effort, but the game is on.

Read Full Post »

Obama’s Birth Certificate and Citizenship Goes to Conference at Supreme Court

Justice is alive and well in this country.  Leo Donofrio’s case that has been submitted to the U.S. Supreme Court regarding Obama’s citizenship has drawn the attention of Justice Clarence Thomas.  The case has been “distributed for conference,” on December 5, 2008. 

Donofrio argues that it is Secretary of State Wells of New Jersey job to verify eligibility for elections and uphold constitutional integrity. “She accepted the certifications of nomination from both major parties under the assumption that both candidate parties were eligible, but she did nothing to verify such eligibility.”  The entire brief is good reading and dispels conspiracy theory and can be found at http://www.blogtext.org/userFiles/naturalborncitizen/ScotusStayAppBrief.doc

The United States Supreme Court scheduled the case – Leo C. Donofrio v. Nina Mitchell Wells, Secretary of State of the State of New Jersey US Supreme Court Docket No. 08A407 – for a conference of the nine Justices.  If four of the nine Justices vote to hear the case in full review, oral argument may be ordered.  The conference is scheduled for December 5, 2008, ten days before the meeting of the Electoral College. The case originally sought, pre-election, to have the names of Barack Obama, John McCain, and Roger Calero removed from New Jersey ballots, and for a stay of the “national election” pending Supreme Court review of whether those candidates were eligible under the Constitution as natural born Citizens, as is required by Article 2, Section 1, Clause 5 of the Constitution of the United States.  On Nov. 19, the case was docketed for full conference of all nine Justices and scheduled for December 5, 2008  http://www.blogtext.org/naturalborncitizen/

Republican Candidate John McCain was born in Panama, Roger Calero, Socialist Worker Party was born in Nicaragua, and Barack Obama has not provided proof to a court where he was born. 

Phil Berg is a lawyer who has raised issue specifically with Obama’s birth certificate not being authentic and has filed numerous court proceedings in an effort to force Obama to produced it. http://dockets.justia.com/docket/court-paedce/case_no-2:2008cv04083/case_id-281573/   Taking his plea to the U.S. Supreme Court, a writ of certiorari was pending with a response due by December 1, 2008.  A response to the court was issued by the FEC- Federal Elections Committee  http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_R-l1iejogZw/SSR7kdEbCqI/AAAAAAAABmg/TD8yPv-ltZk/s1600-h/Berg+v+Obama+–+Waiver.bmp where the docket shows that the respondents have waived their right to respond,  filed November 18, 2008.  Ummm, so where is the response from the DNC and Obama himself who are also named in the suit?  Should there even be a separate response?  The writ extends to December 1, 2008 for a response and in the Berg case the FEC filed for relief separately and I believe separate responses are warranted in this case as well. 

The FEC in Berg v Obama is outline here  http://dockets.justia.com/docket/court-paedce/case_no-2:2008cv04083/case_id-281573/ specifically, The FEC claims it has no oversight in the Constitution’s Presidential Election Qualifications clause. http://docs.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/pennsylvania/paedce/2:2008cv04083/281573/28/ and the judge agreed dismissing the motion specifically against the FEC and all others.

http://www.americasright.com/2008/11/us-supreme-court-decisions-on-berg.html Outlines a look at possible collusion on the part of the FEC, DNC, and Obama, and notes specifically “FEC’s attorney, Gregory Garre, is with the Solicitor General’s office, and does not represent Obama or the DNC. While attorneys acting on behalf of a group of defendants or respondents is not necessarily rare, the difference here is the involvement of the Solicitor General’s office, a federal office.”  How the Court and Berg interpret this, will more than likely impact the outcome of the case.  I think it quite comical that the FEC distances itself from candidates at every turn unless there are Republican dollars at stake in choosing only to review McCain’s campaign finances, and not Obama’s .

Obama hired the Washington Law Firm Sandler, Reiff & Young to represent him against Berg.  One of the lawyers filing the motion to dismiss was Joe Sandler who is also a legal representative for CAIR- Council for American Islamic Relations with reported terrorist ties.  CAIR is suspect at best, for being funded by terrorists of Hamas thru the Holy Land Foundation. https://ahrcanum.wordpress.com/2008/10/20/sandler-vs-berg-for-obama-citizenship/  Obama in the long run may have rely on his newly appointed Attorney General, Eric Holder who is familiar with controversy from serving in the Clinton Administration. http://cbs2chicago.com/topstories/obama.eric.holder.2.867982.html

Where is the MSM, Main Stream Media in all of this?  ABC, NBC, CBS, FOX, and CNN, are all ignoring the Supreme Court cases that challenge Obama’s eligibility and instead are focusing on his future cabinet picks assuming he is meets the qualifications, and focusing on Internet messages from Al Qaeda’s number-two commander, Ayman alZawahri that call Obama and Secretaries of State Colin Powell and Condoleezza Rice, “house negroes.”  Venomous words to be sure, but it what would be equally venomous is to have a President in office that is not qualified based on his citizenship.

Obama can not continue to hide behind a COLB, Certification of Live Birth that remains unverifiable.  http://fightthesmears.com/articles/5/birthcertificate or can he, if he pleads the fifth?  https://ahrcanum.wordpress.com/2008/11/12/obama-could-plead-the-5th-amendment-on-citizenship/

God Bless America.

Read Full Post »

tinfoilhat2

photo linked from http://theblobsite.filmbuffonline.com/BlobFests/2007/BlobFest2007.htm

The anti-Obama rumor mongering hasn’t seemed to dissipate but is flying along under most peoples radar.  I keep seeing more and more people blogging about Berg v Obama, Martin v Hawaii and Donofrio v Wells with statements like, I didn’t know about this until now, and why isn’t this in the mainstream media?  

The reason is simple – there is no proof to rumors.   Circumstantial evidence does not make it fact although one of my lawyer friends could certainly come up with cases where people have been convicted only on circumstantial evidence.  We have to cite the source in lawsuits and understand the rationale and motives behind those that may seek to discrete Obama.  At the same time, we must acknowledge that it imperative to understand that we all have a vested interest in making sure that we have a President who meets all of the qualifications set forth in the Constitution- including the natural born citizen clause.    

I believe in God even tho I have never seen him/her/it.  I believe Obama’s birth certificate exists, even though I have never seen it either. But God is an entity, Obama a mere mortal, fallible like all men.  His fallibility should not come at the expense of America in not producing a verifiable, vaulted copy of his birth certificate.

The amount of circumstantial evidence has begun to add up and many more “regular” citizens who do not make a habit of wearing tin foil on there head are beginning to look again at Obama’s omissions.  From the popular No Quarter http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/10/13/updated-a-dangerous-mixture-of-lies-and-omissions-obama-ayers-wright-and-farrakhan/ to a whole list of books available at http://shop.wnd.com/store/subdept.asp?SUBDEPARTMENT_ID=131 we begin to ascertain that it is more than the fringe who have misgivings. 

Reviewing a lot of the rumors that began to surface in August 2008,  is http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/obama-did-obama-actually-register-for-selective-service/ and months later we still have unanswered questions that keep coming up.  A question arose about Obama’s registration with the Selective Service and that he may not have done so as required by law.  As Debbie Schlussel points out, “The official campaign for President may be over. But Barack Obama’s Selective Service registration card and accompanying documents show that questions about him are not only NOT over, but if the signature on the document is in fact his, our next Commander-in-Chief may have committed a federal crime in 2008, well within the statute of limitations on the matter. If it is not his, then it’s proof positive that our next Commander-in-Chief never registered with the Selective Service as required by law.  http://www.debbieschlussel.com/archives/2008/11/exclusive_did_n.html   She refers to a copy of his Registration that seems to have discrepancies.  Obama’s COLB has discrepancies and that leads us to ask for clarification once again from Obama.    

There are 29 subjects of controversy that Obama identifies on his website. http://fightthesmears.com/   TWENTY-NINE times he has felt compelled to address issues like Reverend Wright, William Ayers, Rashid Khalidi, his COLB, and to defend himself.  There is no mention regarding his Selective Service issues. 

Being so entrenched to the road to the White House and secure that all of the smears are false, Obama has apparently decided not to attend his grandmother’s funeral memorial service in Hawaii.  http://theindependentview.com/?p=353  “Hawaii residents are invited to a tribute service tomorrow for Madelyn Payne Dunham, President-elect Barack Obama’s grandmother.  Dunham, 86, died two nights before her grandson became the first African-American and the first Hawaii-born person elected President.” http://www.starbulletin.com/news/20081113_Dunham_service_set_for_tomorrow.html

I find it an odd show of respect for the woman who helped raise him, to not bother with her funeral.  I recall his statements regarding Reverend Wright , “I can no more disown him,” he told an audience in Philadelphia of his former pastor, “than I can my white grandmother — a woman who helped raise me, a woman who sacrificed again and again for me, a woman who loves me as much as she loves anything in this world, but a woman who once confessed her fear of black men who passed by her on the street, and who on more than one occasion has uttered racial or ethnic stereotypes that made me cringe.”  http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20081021/ap_on_el_pr/obama_grandmother

Obama probably doesn’t have a tin foil hat, I don’t and most people do not. People who have and wear tin foil hats may look stupid outside of Halloween, but I doubt they are.  http://tinfoilhats.newsvine.com/ has some interesting insights on recent issues, rumors, and topics in the news. 

Hats off to those seeking truth, justice and liberty for all; even if it is under an Obama administration.

Read Full Post »

I think Barry and Michele Obama would be great dinner guests.  Our kids could play together and the dogs could sniff each other while we talk of being great citizens over a glass of wine, except that it of course will never happen.  Whatever questions we might ask, surely they would be answered in the same scripted response we have come to expect from The Obama’s.  Perhaps statements like, “I plead the fifth on that issue,” or, “I’ll have to talk to my attorney” would be dominate the conversation while we ate sweet potato pie. 

Having been served with numerous lawsuits regarding his citizenship I find it the epitome of irony that neither Michelle LaVaughn Robinson Obama https://www.iardc.org/ldetail.asp?id=514560103 nor her husband, Barry Baraq Mohammad Hussein Dunham Sotero Obama, Jr https://www.iardc.org/ldetail.asp?id=318304718 are currently authorized to practice law.    Obama worked nine years at Davis Miner Barnhill & Galland, a 12-lawyer firm that specialized in helping develop low-income housing. The firm’s top partner, Allison S. Davis, was, and is, a member of the Chicago Plan Commission, appointed by Mayor Daley. Davis was also a friend of Tony Rezko. Rezko’s who was found guilty on 16/24 felony counts was denied his appeal for a new trial on Nov. 13, 2008. http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/local/chicago/chi-rezko-trial-blotternov13,0,6810451.story 

“The senator, relatively inexperienced in this kind of work, was assigned to tasks appropriate for a junior lawyer,” according to an e-mail from Obama spokesman Robert Gibbs. “These tasks would have included reviewing documents, collecting corporate organizational documents, and drafting corporate resolutions.”  http://www.suntimes.com/news/metro/353829,CST-NWS-rez23.article  I suppose that after nine years of secretarial type duties one would certainly be frustrated and pursue a political career instead.  

With cases pending in the Courts seeking to certify his eligibility, they have hired the Washington Law Firm Sandler, Reiff & Young.  One of the lawyers filing motions to dismiss was Joe Sandler, formerly the in-house council at DNC.  Maybe his name rings a bell?  Joe Sandler, esq., is also a legal representative for CAIR- Council for American Islamic Relations.  https://ahrcanum.wordpress.com/2008/10/20/sandler-vs-berg-for-obama-citizenship/

Case after case has been dismissed in all jurisdictions against Obama, with few exceptions. Most notably, Berg vs Obama and Martin vs Hawaii.  The lesser known case is Donofrio vs Nina Mitchell Wells, New Jersey Secretary of State asking her to certify Obama’s eligibility on the ballot.  http://origin.www.supremecourtus.gov/docket/08a407.htm

No. 08A407  
Title:
Leo C. Donofrio, Applicant
v.
Nina Mitchell Wells, New Jersey Secretary of State
Docketed:  
Lower Ct: Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division
  Case Nos.: (AM-0153-08T2application)
~~~Date~~~  ~~~~~~~Proceedings  and  Orders~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Nov 3 2008 Application (08A407) for stay pending the filing and disposition of a petition for a writ of certiorari, submitted to Justice Souter.
Nov 6 2008 Application (08A407) denied by Justice Souter.

Donofrio claims that SCOTUS clerk, Danny Bickell did not present his Stay Application to Justice Thomas, when it appears that he had every right to do so –“Rule 22(1) clearly states that any application addressed to a particular Justice will be filed with the clerk and transmitted promptly to the Justice in question if that Justice has authority to grant the relief being sought,” Donofrio said. “Now, while I didn’t expect Justice Souter to grant the application, Rule 22(4) states that denial of a stay allows for resubmission to a Justice of your choice, and I was ready to resubmit it to Justice Thomas.”  http://www.americasright.com/2008/11/second-eligibility-related-action.html  Donofrio’s case history and updates can be found at Donofrio’s blog http://www.blogtext.org/naturalborncitizen/topic/8700.html

Lest Attorney Andy Martin be out of the lime light, instead of focusing his energy on his own case and search for Obama’s vaulted birth certificate, has written a letter to the PA Supreme Court Disciplinary Board to to investigate the conduct of attorney Philip J. Berg. http://contrariancommentary.wordpress.com/2008/11/12/anti-obama-attorney-philip-j-berg-faces-disciplinary-complaint/  “There have been a lot of questions, and criticism, swirling around Mr. Berg’s behavior,” Martin stated. So much for mutual respect.

Berg sought to disbar and remove Justices”… on the 1st anniversary of the U.S. Supreme Court decision in Bush vs. Gore which “anointed” Bush as President writes to three (3) U.S. Supreme Court Justices, Justices O’Connor, Scalia and Thomas requesting that they agree to “Voluntary Disbarment” for failing to “recuse” themselves in said case and other violations. http://www.votermarch.org/BergPet.htm 

Another lawsuits is rumored from Vice presidential Candidate Wiley S. Drake Sr.  asking to de-certify Barack Obama because he has refused to release proof of being a Natural Born Citizen, thereby disqualifying Obama in his bid for the Office http://obambi.wordpress.com/2008/11/03/vice-presidential-candidate-wiley-s-drake-sr-to-file-in-court-asking-to-de-certify-barack-obama-because-he-has-refused-to-release-proof-of-being-a-natural-born-citizen-thereby-disqualifying-obama-i/ but I have yet to see any actual legal proceeding on the net.  

 I am proud of these Americans who continue to question President Elect Obama’s citizenship and protect our Constitution. It reminds me of Michelle Obama proclaiming that for “the first time” in her adult life,” she was proud of America, as she spoke during a rally to support her husband’s presidential bid.  http://www.bostonherald.com/news/national/politics/2008/view.bg? and http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/02/20/maybe-they-dont-want-to-change/?ex=1361250000&en=9d564dff2b7ab130&ei=5088&partner=rssnyt&emc=rss  Stan Hewitts Town Hall has the audio here http://hughhewitt.townhall.com/MediaPlayer/AudioPlayer.aspx?ContentGuid=9e3a08aa-ad84-46cf-8492-6aff289bca42 

How proud both Michelle and Barry as former attorney’s must be, to be so entrenched in Court proceedings through out the land.  In her thesis she wrote how she is determined to “utilize all of my present and future resources to benefit [the black] community first and foremost.”   http://www.suntimes.com/news/metro/221458,CST-NWS-mich21.article.

Her thesis “Princeton Educated Blacks and The Black Community” is available courtesy of  http://obamaprincetonthesis.wordpress.com/

It’s too bad the Barack family is not using all of its resources to give benefit to all Americans.  Obama himself could end the charades in showing us his official, vaulted, original birth certificate before the family, Obama’s mother-in-law, and the new dog move into the White House and he takes the Oath of Office.  Obama is not going to show anyone anything unless a court of law demands it and as I mentioned in a previous post, he can just take the fifth and not incriminate himself.  https://ahrcanum.wordpress.com/2008/11/12/obama-could-plead-the-5th-amendment-on-citizenship/

I wonder if any one will question the citizenship of the dog?

Lest anyone need reminding, “We are a government of the people, by the people, for the people.”   Abraham Lincoln in his Gettysburg Address, 1863.

Read Full Post »

I do not wear tinfoil on my head and I voted for That (Other) One.  I will have to swallow my pride and support the office when he puts his hand on the Bible [and it better not be the Koran] when taking the Oath of Presidency but, I need to know now, that I am standing behind man and a country that is being led by an honest to God, American citizen that meets the qualifications of the office regarding his citizenship status – and the U.S. Supreme Court has asked the same.  

At  http://myiq2xu.wordpress.com/2008/10/11/who-gives-a-fuck-about-obamas-birth-certificate/ the author asks, ” Who gives a f^^k about Obama’s birth certificate?” and says in the post “in regards to his birth certificate, it is not relevant to Barack Obama’s qualifications for President.”  and that “accurate answers to the questions are still none of our business.” 

It is my business and it better be everyone’s business to know the citizenship of our Presidency, I after all have standing and want accurate answers.  I fail to see how circumventing the U.S. Constitution’s clear indicators of qualification for the Office is an acceptable reason to have voted for him or support him and until such proof is offered that, beyond any reasonable doubt, in a court of law, and specifically the US Supreme Court of Law, that he is a U.S. Citizen. 

…..directly under Article II, Section 1, Clause 4 of the Constitution—to require that anyone standing for “the Office of President” must verify his eligibility for that position, at least when serious allegations have been put forward that he is not eligible, and he has otherwise refused to refute those allegations with evidence that should be readily available if he is eligible. That “Case[ ]” is one the Constitution itself defines. And the Constitution must be enforceable in such a “Case[ ]” in a timely manner, by anyone who cares to seek enforcement, because of the horrendous consequences that will ensue if it is flouted.  http://www.newswithviews.com/Vieira/edwin84.htm Edwin Viera, Jr. 

Acceptance of web pages like factcheck as providing factual information are suspect at best, especially when there Obama has ties to the Annenberg political Group with long standing ties to William Ayers.  http://www.factcheck.org/  I can write it here on the web and make official notification to the world that I am the King of my back 50, but that doesn’t make it so -although my children think it to be true.  Obama’s own web site displays his COLB- certificate of live birth but that doesn’t make it so either.  In a court of law, only physical evidence is admitted.  Thanks again to Al Gore for inventing the Internet.  rofl.

A week after the election and the silence of MSM- Main Stream Media in regard to Obama’s citizenship lawsuits is beyond reprehensible and leads one to ask, is there really freedom of the press?  In the media’s defense, if they tick off the President Elect, they will not have any more questions to ask or scoops on the Obama Administration.  At That One’s first press conference, he called on numerous media groups but failed to call on a reporter from Fox News.  Imagine that.  http://current.com/items/89510124/fox_news_snubbed_at_obama_s_first_press_conference.htm 

Neither Berg or Martin have made many headlines, let alone the case of Dr. T.B Bradley, Psy, D.,  who formally applied to the Court for leave to intervene in Case 2:08-cv-04083-RBS Document 16 filed October 7, 2008 http://nationalwriterssyndicate.com/index2.php?option=com_content&do_pdf=1&id=767  or the suit by Leo Donofrio against the New Jersey Secretary of State who “assumed” Omaba as qualified.   http://www.blogtext.org/naturalborncitizen/ It claims “To be a naturally born citizen, this is the issue.  You are either “born” one or you are not, and if not, you can’t be President.  The 14th Amendment can make one a “citizen” but not a “natural born citizen”.  This is the backbone of my case.  Had the US legislature, and the States who ratified the 14th Amendment, sought to bestow “natural born citizen” status, then the 14th Amendment would say so, but it does not.  It confers “citizen” status, and only if the person is subject to the jurisdiction of the United States. ” Find more in the UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT Docket #: 08A407. and at http://www.democratic-disaster.com//index.php?topic=286.0  He references the Movant Papers which are based on a Constitutional issue, that it is proper for the US Supreme Court to review the case http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2129827/posts and it all may end up on Justice Clarence Thomas’ lap.

Should Obama make the Presidential “Oath or Affirmation” of office in full knowledge that he is not a natural born Citizen he will have committed a crime of perjury for being ineligible for the Office -Article II, Section 1, Clause 8) since he cannot “faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States.”  “I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my Ability preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.” http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Article_Two_of_the_United_States_Constitution#Clause_6:_Vacancy_and_Disability

Besides having committed perjury it may very well be proved that he usurped the Office of Presidency which would be a criminal act under Title 18, United States Code, Section 242.  http://www.fbi.gov/hq/cid/civilrights/statutes.htm#section242  http://www.usdoj.gov/crt/crim/242fin.php  thus having deprived citizens the right to vote for whom, at the time of the election, constituencies assumed Obama had met the qualification to become President that is secured and protected by the Constitution and laws of the U.S.   Did Obama deprive me of my guaranteed right?  The Courts will tell.

Where is his birth certificate?  Here we have a President Elect that lays claim that he is going to share as much information as he can with the American people and yet, he can not share his simple birth certificate with out being forced by a court of law.  Taking it all the way to The Supreme Court, Justice Davis Souter has requested that Obama provide unmitigated proof of citizenship to the court by December 1, 2008, in the case Berg v Obama.  

So as not to incriminate himself, or the DNC who have propped him up as their candidate and in an effort to hide behind laws, I wonder if President Elect Obama will plead the 5th in a refusal to testify against himself  http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/Plead+the+Fifth and defy the U.S. Supreme Court and people like you and me who actually do “give a f^^k”.

Read Full Post »

colb1

 

09 NOVEMBER 2008: Supreme Court Of The United States (SCOTUS) Supreme Court Justice David Souter has agreed that a review of the federal lawsuit filed by attorney Phil Berg against Barack Hussein Obama II, et al., which was subsequently dismissed for lack of standing is warranted. SCOTUS Docket No. 08-570..  Berg’s petition for an injunction to stay the November 4th election was denied, but the Clerk also required the defendants to respond to the Writ of Certiorari, which I believe, requires the concurrence of four justices, by December 1, 2008. 

The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that people like me and the others who want to know the origins of Barack Obama’s citizenship are not stupid, and the Court it appears to want to see Obama’s birth certificate too.  There is nothing in the main stream media about Berg vs Obama or Martin vs Hawaii and until it is, we have remained on the fringe until being vindicated, at least a little bit.  It seems when talking about Obama’s citizenship that people don’t know a thing, they believe it is a lie or they are following the pursuits of justice to determine his eligibility.  For millions of voters, any citizenship questions they may have had were laid to rest long ago but to others, questions still remain and poignantly is, why President Elect Obama will not just show us his vaulted birth certificate? 

Groups like fact check have show us what is called a ‘re-issued’ certificate, often called by the states a certificate of live birth or a COLB.  A COLB normally passes for a birth certificate and is just as good unless questions arise. A comparison between the two documents can be found here. http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_R-l1iejogZw/SQLJZbuSVXI/AAAAAAAABKM/9B2p–yZzDw/s1600-h/Obama+COLB.jpg

Berg’s web site headlines “U. S. SUPREME COURT AWAITS RESPONSE TO BERG’S WRIT OF CERTIORARI FROM OBAMA, DNC and Co-DEFENDANTS For   For Immediate Release: – 11/07/08 http://www.obamacrimes.com/  “I look forward to receiving defendant Obama’s response to the writ and am hopeful the U. S. Supreme Court will review Berg v. Obama. I believe Mr. Obama is not a constitutionally-qualified natural-born citizen and is ineligible to assume the office of President of the United States.”

Rule 11 as noted by the Supreme Court seems to make it clear that Justice Souter’s granting of a review on the Writ of Certiorari is not a right entitled to citizen Phil Berg, but rather is a matter of judicial discretion based upon a compelling reason. The compelling reason is the Constitutional requirement that no person except a natural born citizen shall be eligible to the office of President.

As I understand it, what this means is that on or before December 1, 2008 Barack Hussein Obama must respond to the writ of certiorari.  The Berg v Obama case really is really about a whole list of 56 questions regarding Obama’s place of birth. http://quipster.wordpress.com/2008/10/11/56-questions-obama-refuses-to-answer-about-citizenship/

The Rule of 11 http://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frcp/Rule11.htm (4) the denials of factual contentions are warranted on the evidence or, if specifically so identified, are reasonably based on belief or a lack of information.  I can not imagine that as a Harvard Law Graduate and as President Elect that Obama would ignore such a request from the Justices of the Supreme Court and he will be compelled to provide a vault copy his original birth certificate.  In what is called a writ of mandamus to do so, they have absolutely no legal basis to refuse an order of the Supreme Court of the United States.

If Obama fails to do present his birth certificate, surely the Justices would be remiss in being defied.  They will then have to decide what to do about a President-elect who refuses to prove his natural-born citizenship.  Will Obama be held in contempt of court?  The Court may in fact, accept his COLB and in the long run issue a dismissal, citing that the responsibility of eligibility lies in Congress. We have already seen claims by The Federal Election Committee that it is not responsible for proof of eligibility

http://fightthesmears.com/articles/5/birthcertificate  posts his COLB but even that doesn’t’t prove even that is real, only that there is no credible evidence that it is a fake.  The raised seal and authoritative signature needed to validate the document cannot be seen on the scan http://web.israelinsider.com/Articles/Politics/12939.htm.  His campaign has a burden of proving otherwise and his website says that, “Smears claiming Barack Obama doesn’t have a birth certificate aren’t actually about that piece of paper — they’re about manipulating people into thinking Barack is not an American citizen.” Without that that little piece of paper, my friend- the fringe will not be convoluted into believing Obama is an American Citizen and that our Constitution will remain in crisis.  

While Martin has a case that is on the docket in Hawaii for November 18, 2008, there is a million dollar reward for anyone who can provide Obama’s birth certificate https://ahrcanum.wordpress.com/2008/11/09/obamas-birth-certificate-one-million-dollar-reward/ and a petition- Stop the Obama Constitutional Crisis with a reported 80,000+ signatures –the site got those signatures with out the help of ACORN!.   http://www.rallycongress.com/constitutional-qualification/1244/stop-obama-constitutional-crisis/ 

“I can see a unanimous Court (en banc) decertifying the election if Obama refuses to produce his birth certificate,” says Raymond S. Kraft, an attorney and writer. “They cannot do otherwise without abandoning all credibility as guardians of the Constitution. Even the most liberal justices, however loathe they may to do this, still consider themselves guardians of the Constitution. The Court is very jealous of its power – even over presidents, even over presidents-elect.”  Kraft is a contributor to http://www.familysecuritymatters.org/publications/id.1614/pub_detail.asp

Most citizens, including myself will support the office and pray that should Obama pass through the Electoral collage and take the Oath of Presidency that his decisions yield the best four our future.  With more than a month and a half until Obama takes that Oath, we need a rational conclusion to make a rational judgment that he is in fact eligible.  The final judgment could be be influenced by any chaos that could result from de-certifying and voiding the election.  Found wrong or right, Berg and the American people could loose, even if he is right. 

What could be so hard about that, unless you have no birth certificate to present.

Read Full Post »

 map-purple

The campaign for President is winding down but the media’s news campaign for the results of the election are running full steam ahead.

Americans are tuning in to Main Stream Media and the Internet like never before to follow election results and see where our country is headed in the next four years.  It is incredible really, the amount of information that one has access to in America, and that the access and reporting is in real time.  It becomes unimaginable that there are places in the world like Russia and China where the government censures the media at it’s convenience.  Freedom of speech and of the press are often taken for granted in America.  Whatever the outcome, our Election Day coverage in the media displays to the entire world that democracy works.  There is no amount of advertising dollars that could ever be spent that indicates just how powerful freedom is.

It will be interesting to note not only the variances in the graphic designs but the uncertainty of predictions.  In 2004, polling numbers, predictions and maps were cast aside as our Judaical system ruled in the end that George Bush won.  Statistics and graphs can misrepresent the truth and be manipulated into reflecting opinion, rather than fact.  Will Fox News, that typically leans toward Republican candidates, show graphs that reflect a bias toward McCain?  Will CNN, that is stereotypically pro Democrat, yield information that indicates Obama the winner?  Time will tell in the final outcome which media outlet is the most reliable, fair and balanced in reporting the results and activities of Election 2008.  My prediction and hope is that voters put country first and that in the end all the maps- no matter the source, confirm John S. McCain as the next President of The United States of America. 

One University of Michigan physics professor and his team applied mathematics, geography, and visualization to show us that those blocky red states and blue states are actually a lovely, purpley, swirly, fishy looking thing. The above image comes from http://www-personal.umich.edu/~mejn/election/.

This Google link page lets you see state-by-state breakdowns, with vote totals within each state, and also county-by-county breakdowns, if you click on the state, then click on “County Map” in the upper right-hand corner of the pop up window.  http://maps.google.com/help/maps/elections/#2008_election Google also has a map http://myfairelection.com/ where we can follow events at the polls as reported by citizens like you and me.  We are only a few hours into the election and already people are posting and logging in to identify problems and successes at the voting booths across America. 

Here are some great links to get you perusing all the information available with many maps and a few graphs that reflect what is being reported and how the election may be trending.
· CNN ElectionCenter Map
· Fox News Interactive Map
· ABC News Map
· Yahoo Election Dashboard
· MSN Election Map Room
· MSNBC Election Map
· NPR Election Map
· Wall Street Journal Electoral College Calculator (browser resize!)
· 270towin.com
· idashboards.com Election 2008 (results?)
· NYTimes Election 2008 (results?)
· BBC News Elections 2008 (results?)
· USA Today (results?)
· Newsweek Politics (results?)
· Time Magazine (results?)
· Google Maps 2008 Elections Gallery
· Forst and the Trees Election Center (results?)
· Color-Weighted Election 2008 Cartograms (results on 5 November).

http://infosthetics.com/archives/2008/11/question_what_is_the_best_us_election_result_graph.html

While it is early on Election Day, all reports show a calm America as we go about our duty to vote freely without duress of martial law, riots, civil disorder, or the Enforcement of Laws to Restore Public Order.  https://ahrcanum.wordpress.com/2008/11/03/riot-police-ready-for-civil-unrest-on-election-night/ 

It is also notable that any pending litigation from Andy Martin, Philip Berg http://dockets.justia.com/docket/court-paedce/case_no-2:2008cv04083/case_id-281573/  or John Q. Citizen that demanded that the election be delayed or that Obama shows the world his authentic, vaulted birth certificate have not been successful. https://ahrcanum.wordpress.com/2008/10/31/obamas-citizenship-goes-to-supreme-court/ Both Martin and Berg have court dates after the elections regarding Obama’s citizenship and qualifications to become President under the natural born citizen clause, Article II, Section 1, of the U.S. Constitution.   The electoral college process takes place after the election and is outlined here http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/electoral-college/faq.html  These are the key dates:

  • November 4, 2008 – General Election: The voters in each State choose electors to serve in the Electoral College. As soon as election results are final, the States prepare seven or nine original “Certificates of Ascertainment” of the electors chosen, and send one original along with two certified copies (or three originals, if nine were prepared) to the Archivist of the United States.
  • December 15, 2008 – Meeting of Electors: The electors in each State meet to select the President and Vice President of the United States. The electors record their votes on six “Certificates of Vote,” which are paired with the six remaining original “Certificates of Ascertainment.” The electors sign, seal and certify the packages of electoral votes and immediately send them to the President of the Senate, the Archivist of the United States and other designated Federal and State officials.
  • December 24, 2008 – Deadline for Receipt of Electoral Votes: The President of the Senate, the Archivist of the United States, and other designated Federal and State officials must have the electoral votes in hand.
  • January 6, 2009 – Counting Electoral Votes in Congress: The Congress meets in joint session to count the electoral votes (unless Congress passes a law to change the date).
  • God Bless America, her citizens, and especially today, The Voter.

    Read Full Post »

     

     
    Black, White, Yellow, or any other shade of peoples, Americans must believe in Red, White and Blue on Election Day.  The world looks to America for leadership and stability and when we deviate in our path of Democracy and fair elections, we subject ourselves to further erosion of our power to the world.  America and it’s allies helped allow for the first voting in 50 years in Iraq with the means of dipping a finger into purple ink, it is not so easy to identify a voter in America, nor should it be.  There is a whole variety of problems that we can anticipate.  In early voting, usually in favor of Democratic Candidates, we have already seen challenges at the polls.  On Election Day, indeed we may have voting machine manipulation and malfunction, polling places that run out of paper, long lines, and a potential that precincts could be overwhelmed by an outpouring of voters.  Just imagine in Chicago, if the turnout is so massive with 8 hour waits and not every voter gets to vote, what kind of voter unrest could occur?
     
    Only last year, with the results from Kenya’s closely contested elections still up in the air and evidence growing of election mischief, riots and ethnic clashes erupted across the country. Kenya is east Africa’s most stable and prosperous democracy but rioting killed hundreds after the election. Raila Odinga, who was leading in the polls prior to the election was the candidate Obama had been campaigning for but he lost his election to Mwai Kibaki. All the more reason that Obama’s lack of interference in his Aunt Zeituni’s plea for US Asylum seems suspect.
     
    When Main Stream Media, CBS News, brings out a blog post just two days before the election that is titled “Police Prepare For Possible Election Night Riots,” and the lead in question asks, ” Will election night bring civil Unrest?”  maybe we had better pay attention.  http://www.cbsnews.com/blogs/2008/10/22/politics/horserace/entry4539330.shtml 

    In Chicago, Obama is holding a rally downtown after the polls close on Tuesday night and Mayor Daley believes that up to a million people could flood the city’s streets. All police leave has been canceled and off-duty firefighters have been told to keep their kit ready at home. http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/politics/obama/chi-obama-rally-qanov02,0,5894064.story   In Augusta, Georgia reports are of Officers Gearing up with riot training http://chronicle.augusta.com/stories/102808/met_481157.shtml while Detroit and Los Angeles were also deploying extra police out of concern for the potentially heightened emotions raised by this election.

    This historic presidential contest will feature either America’s first black President or first female Vice President. Iraqi’s went to the polls in the face of real threats, I don’t think Americans will.  Clearly though, the unspoken concern among some is that a surprise Obama loss could lead to suspicion of foul play and violence could ensue in cities with large “black populations based on previous riots in urban areas.”  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Riot.  “So let me get this straight: No matter what happens, we should expect blacks to riot. If this isn’t racist, then call me David Duke in a sundress.”  http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,443958,00.html

    We’ve seen “emergency-preparedness” steps taken in Denver before the DNC and at every campaign rally Obama and McCain have attended and nothing major has happened.  We’ve  prepared for Y2K and nothing happened.  In case all hell breaks loose, we will be duly prepared in major cities and do not forget that the Army’s Brigade Homeland Tour of U.S. Combat troops have been repatriated from Iraq to help with any civil unrest.  

    The Army force on active duty on U.S. Soil operates under U.S. Norther Commands Chemical, Biological, Radiological, Nuclear, high Yeild Explosives unit (CBRNE)- The Consequence Management Response Force or CCMRF is commonly referred to as “sea-smurf”. http://www.armytimes.com/news/2008/09/army_homeland_090708w/ The force was fully activated October 1st, 2008 in a response to the controversial John Warner Defense Appropriations Act http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=h109-5122.  The title of the law the “Insurrection Act” has been renamed, “Enforcement of Laws to Restore Public Order”  http://www.bordc.org/threats/hr5122.php giving power to the President to invoke martial law.  Public Law 109-364, (H.R.5122) http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=viewArticle&code=MOR20061029&articleId=3618.  Posse Comitatus Act of 1878 “the power of the country” prohibited a president from using the military for police actions in the United States until now.  https://ahrcanum.wordpress.com/2008/10/01/posse-comitatus-act/  Way, way and I mean way, on the fringe is the theory that Delta Forces and Sea-Smurf will operate like Hitler’s SS Gestapo at the start of German socialism. 

    .S. Army Field Manual 19-15, Civil Disturbances, 1985, is the current doctrinal reference on civil disturbances. Most tactics, techniques, and procedures (TTP) addressed in this manual were developed from experiences gained during domestic riots in the 1960s. There is no Army doctrine on the use of non-lethal weapons and munitions. http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/library/report/call/call_00-7_ch1.htm.  Some rioters have become quite sophisticated at understanding and withstanding the tactics used by police.  Manuals for successful rioting are available on the Internet and encourage rioters to get the press involved, as there is more safety with the cameras rolling.  The National Lawyers Guild has produced a 31 page document called “Legal Observer Training Manual. http://www.nlg.org/resources/LO_Manual.pdf 

    President Roosevelt once said, “In politics there are no accidents.  If it happens you can bet it was planned that way.” I hardly think people will take to the streets, nor will the service of the Army, The National Guard, or riot troops be necessary.  We are a patient people and have endured two years of campaigning with no unrest.  Election Day occurs on a school and work night with honest to God people who have to get up and go to work, and many of McCain supporters will be sleeping well before the results are in.   No matter who wins, I believe in widespread respect for the law and while I encourage you to vote McCain, my prediction is that nothing will happen.  That’s my theory anyways.

    God Bless America.

    Read Full Post »

    Older Posts »

    %d bloggers like this: