In the matter of Berg vs Obama, questioning Obama’s citizenship and eligibility to be President, Berg has appealed all the way to the Supreme Court and we are awaiting a ruling which may take until hell freezes over. None the less, no facts were ruled valid or invalid as they have not been heard. In all these filings the FEC – Federal Election Committee is named along with Obama and rightfully so the FEC made a special filing to the Court requesting relief from the claim since the dismissal of the case not apparently mention them specifically from being dismissed.
DEFENDANT FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION’S MOTION TO DISMISS FOR LACK OF SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 12(b)(1)
The FEC claims it has no oversight in the Constitutions Presidential Election Qualifications clause.
WHAT, NO OVERSIGHT? Go and read the brief the FEC filed for yourself and see that the FEC is not in charge of eligibility. Who the frig is in charge of election qualifications?
The history of the Berg filings. http://dockets.justia.com/docket/court-paedce/case_no-2:2008cv04083/case_id-281573/
Incidentally Judge Surrick on wrote “AND NOW, this 27th day of October, 2008, having dismissed Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief, it is ORDERED that all pending motions are DISMISSED as moot. IT IS SO ORDERED.BY THE COURT:/s/ R. Barclay Surrick, Judge.
According to Mr Berg, he has filed two documents:
- Application for an Immediate Injunction to Stay the Presidential Election of November 4, 2008; and
- Petition for Writ of Certiorari. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Certiorari
http://www.fec.gov/ If the Federal Government can’t policy itself to have over sight in Federal Elections, who does?