Of all the low down dirty deeds regarding Obama’s citizenship, I had forgotten all about Senate Resolution 511. Before Obama’s www.fightthesmears.com even began to address lurking questions on Obama’s illicit associations with Ayers, Retzko, Wright and the citizenship issue with Berg v Obama at the Supreme Court or Donofrio v Wells scheduled for a SCOTUS conference on December 5, 2008, was SR 511.
What started out as an effort to put to rest any objection to Senator John McCain’s eligibility to become our nation’s President because he was born outside of the U.S. in Panama, was in fact a preemptive strike to eliminate any claim that Obama might not be a natural born citizen either . A February NY Times article raised the question as to whether McCain, who was born in 1936 on a U.S. military installation in the Panama Canal Zone, satisfied the constitutional prerequisites to become president. Article II, Section 1 of the Constitution requires a president to be a natural born citizen.
“There are powerful arguments that Senator McCain or anyone else in this position is constitutionally qualified, but there is certainly no precedent,” Sarah H. Duggin, an associate professor of law at Catholic University who has studied the issue extensively, told the NYT. “It is not a slam-dunk situation.” http://blogs.wsj.com/law/2008/04/11/clinton-obama-agree-mccains-a-natural-born-citizen/.
SR 511 is Constitutional Resolution that got slam dunked when it passed in April of this year (08). Obama’s congressional supporters – including Gov. Claire McCaskill (D-MOi), Senator Patrick Leahy (D-VT), Sen. Barack Obama (D-IL) Sen. Tom Coburn (R-OK), Sen. Hillary Clinton (D-NY), and Sen. James Webb (D-VA) –proposed and passed a Resolution (S.Res.511) entitled: Recognizing that John Sidney McCain, III, is a natural born citizen. http://www.opencongress.org/bill/110-sr511/text.
S. Res.511 clearly states that “…Whereas the term `natural born Citizen’, as that term appears in Article II, Section 1, is not defined in the Constitution of the United States…”
Whereas, a natural born Citizen is not defined? Hold your horses there and re-read. Natural born citizen is not defined. Hmmmmmmm? The bill states, ” Whereas previous presidential candidates were born outside of the United States of America and were understood to be eligible to be President…” This piece of legislation was introduced, written and passed clearly with intent to extend the meaning of the Constitution, and prior to SR 511 there was no presidency in Congress.
Mrs. Clinton’s support and co-authorship of this bill, even though they were battling in the primary election for the presidency, was so incredibly strategic and manipulative on Obama’s part that it borders on absolute fraud. The bill completely attempts to redefine his citizenship and will try to keep him eligible, constitutionally as the 44th President, even after he finally shows his Official Vault Birth Certificate.
Do you honestly think Obama wants Hillary Clinton to act as his Secretary of State? Obama owes Hillary big time for sponsoring SR 511, and her nomination as SOS is payback. He will put up with her, and torture her until he can no longer stand it or she will, herself – resign from the position.
The Supreme Court may seek to grant Donofrio, Berg, and maybe even Keyes, a day in court and America may finally come to know the truth on Obama’s birth certificate. It has been alleged his birth is in Kenya, he lost his citizenship in Indonesia, his mother was a minor when she gave birth, his dad was Frank Marshall, he is an illegal alien, blah, blah, blah- according to SR 511- the Democrats would have us believe Constitution was tossed by the wayside and no matter.
Alas, in truth, “Simple resolutions do not require the approval of the other house nor the signature of the President, and they do not have the force of law.” http://www.senate.gov/legislative/common/briefing/leg_laws_acts.htm#4
Whether or not we are ever witness to his birth certificate, the facts are fuzzy and circumspect that Obama may not be qualified to hold any office in the United States. Would any elector who now votes for Obama may be found guilty of treason?
The Electoral College meets on December 15, 2008 to issue an official election determination. The members of Congress who have sworn to uphold the U.S. Constitution and its laws – including the citizenship clause, will vote in January to either confirm or reject the vote of the Electoral College but Electors are not bound to cast their vote for the candidate presented. “Faithless Electors” are members of the Electoral College who, for whatever reason do not vote for their party’s designated candidate. Since the founding of the Electoral College, there have been 156 faithless Electors. http://www.fairvote.org/e_college/faithless.htm Undoubtedly a faithless elector would run risk of censure and other political retaliation from his party. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Faithless_elector Can we depend on Joe Lieberman stand up again for what is right? What one member of Congress has enough balls to stand up to question that the basic constitutional requirements for office have been met? There is something totally wrong with relying on a Constitutional Crisis to satisfy our laws on eligibility. http://www.ziitrend.com/predict/on/any_faithless_elector_s_in_2008_2008-11-04 is where you can vote or following the voting on whether or not there will be a Constitutional Crisis at all. With 63% accuracy in the past, the current prediction is 70% favorable for a crisis.
Three is little doubt intelligence has been keeping a watchful eye court proceedings. Would there be peaceful noncompliance, civil disobedience, Martial Law?
This is not the change anyone had hoped for from Obama.
God Bless America.
Like this:
Like Loading...
Read Full Post »
Obama’s Birth Certificate Denied to Andy Martin AGAIN
Posted in Ahrcanum, Secrets, Lies, & Truth, tagged 5TH Amendment, Ahrcanum, Andres Martin Tigona, Andy Martin, Andy Martin Denied, Andy Martin Lawsuit, Andy Martin Ruling, Article 2, Article II Section 1, Barack Hussein Obama, Barry Baraq Mohammad Hussein Dunham Sotero Obama Jr, Berg Supreme Court, Berg v Obama, Berg vs Obama, birth certificate, CAIR, Campaign Finance, Certificate of Live Birth, certified long form birth certificate, citizen, citizenship, Citizenship Lawsuits, Clarence Thomas, COLB, Constititutional Crisis, Constitution, contrarian commentary, David Souter, DNC, Docket 08-570, Donofrio, Donofrio v Wells, Donofrio vs Wells, Electoral College, eligibility, fake birth certificate, Federal Compaint Berg vs Obama, Federal Election Commission, Fifth Amendment, Fox, Game On, Gregory Garre, Hawaii Birth Certificate, Joe Sandler, lack of standing, legal precedence, Leo Donofrio, Main Stream Media, martin Denied, Martin lawsuit, Martin Ruling, Martin v Hawaii Ruling, Martin vs Hawaii, Meeting of Electors, natural born citizen, Natural Born Citizen Clause of the U.S. Constitution, New Jersey Lawsuit, Nina Mitchell Wells, Obama Birth Certificate, Obama Records, Obama's Birth Certificate, Obama's citizenship, Obama-gate, Obamagate, Philip Berg, Philip J. Berg, Politics, Presidential Affirmation, Presidential Election Qualification Clause, Presidential Eligibiltiy, SCOTUS, Scotus Docket No. 08-570, Solicitor General's Office, Supreme Court, Take the fifth, vaulted birth certificate, writ of certiorari, writ of mandamus · on November 21, 2008| 1 Comment »
Game on. Obama’s Birth Certificate vs Current Court Proceedings. Last inning, bottom of the ninth. Only two batters to go as Andy Martin has struck out. Berg and Donofrio are up next at SCOTUS.
Hawaii Circuit Court Judge Bert Ayabe has dismissed Internet author Andy Martin’s lawsuit seeking to obtain a copy of President-elect Barack Obama’s Hawai’i birth certificate. The judge upheld arguments from Gov. Linda Lingle’s administration that Martin — a political opponent of Obama — had no standing under state law to obtain a copy of the document.
Martin “does not have a direct and tangible interest in the vital statistic records being sought, namely the birth certificate of President Obama,” Ayabe wrote.
He cited Martin’s “lack of standing” and also ruled that Martin never legally served Lingle and state Health Department director Dr. Chiyome Fukino with a copy of the legal complaint. What a faux pau. http://www.honoluluadvertiser.com/article/20081121/NEWS20/811210355/1001/localnewsfront
Andy Martin says, ‘Our great national tantrum is over; our great national nightmare is just beginning.’His columns are also posted at www.ContrarianCommentary.blogspot.com; www.contrariancommentary.wordpress.com. Martin is the author of Obama: The Man Behind The Mask, published in July 2008, see www.OrangeStatePress.com. Martin goes further to say “it’s time for the Republican Party to slim down its playbook, and concentrate on the vital issues where Barack Obama is likely to stumble over the next two years. Martin calls for al “all-American Republican Party” for “all-Americans” with every American welcome and “no outcasts.”
Berg and Donofrio are up next to bat for the request for Obama’s long form, vaulted birth certificate and question of eligibility. Berg v Obama and Donofrio v Wells are floating around SCOTUS. A Dec 1 deadline for Berg and a Dec 5 conference scheduled for the Donofrio case. For a background on these cases visit https://ahrcanum.wordpress.com/2008/11/20/obamas-birth-certificate-and-citizenship-goes-to-conference-at-supreme-court/ .
The pitch hitter in this Obamagate game of deception may be former Presidential Candidate, Alan Keyes who joined the fight to release President-elect Barack Obama’s birth certificate this week, suing to keep the California Electoral College from meeting. http://www.thebulletin.us/site/index.cfm?newsid=20202575&BRD=2737&PAG=461&dept_id=576361&rfi=8 The writ of mandamus can be found here http://www.tomshakely.com/bulletin/final_writ_keyes_v_bowen.pdf. What is Keyes motive for the filing? Truth or Revenge? Is Keyes a sore loser remembering that in 2004, he lost his bid for a U.S. Senate seat in Illinois to none other than Barack Obama?
To date the evidence as provided by Obama seems compelling. That— the President-Elect was born in the Kapi’olani Medical Center for Women and Children, in Honolulu, Hawaii, on Aug. 4, 1961- Hawaii was a state at that time. Sen. Obama’s mother, Ann Dunham, who died in 1995, was an American by birth. She was from Wichita, Kansas. His [sic- alleged] dad, Barack Obama, Sr., was from Kenya. His parents divorced in 1964. In 1967, Obama moved to Indonesia with his stepfather, Lolo Soetoro and his mother. In 1971, he returned to Hawaii, to live with his grandparents, Madelyn and Stanley Dunham, who raised him. Obama’s father died in 1982. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barack_Obama#Early_life_and_career Sounds all good and true doesn’t it? Oops- we we can’t verify where he was born exactly, nor his citizenship because he will not produce his birth certificate and is wasting the courts precious time by not doing so.
Not being able to verify his citizenship means we can not verify his qualification of eligibility for President. Article II, Section 1 of The U.S. Constitution- “No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President…” Today’s post from Citizen Wells “Electoral College facts, Obama not eligible, Electors must vote per US Constitution, Faithless Electors, Federal Election Laws, State Laws, Elector pledges, States and Electors must uphold US Constitution” http://citizenwells.wordpress.com/2008/11/21/electoral-college-facts-obama-not-eligible-electors-must-vote-per-us-constitution-faithless-electors-federal-election-laws-state-laws-elector-pledges-states-and-electors-must-uphold-us-constitu/ is an awesome display of what not producing a birth certificate, and verifying your eligibility can cause.
Martin may have struck out after a fairly valiant effort, but the game is on.
Share this:
Like this:
Read Full Post »