Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Posts Tagged ‘David Souter’

Obama’s Birth Certificate Denied to Andy Martin AGAIN

Game on.  Obama’s Birth Certificate vs Current Court Proceedings. Last inning, bottom of the ninth.  Only two batters to go as Andy Martin has struck out. Berg and Donofrio are up next at SCOTUS.

Hawaii Circuit Court Judge Bert Ayabe has dismissed Internet author Andy Martin’s lawsuit seeking to obtain a copy of President-elect Barack Obama’s Hawai’i birth certificate.  The judge upheld arguments from Gov. Linda Lingle’s administration that Martin — a political opponent of Obama — had no standing under state law to obtain a copy of the document.

Martin “does not have a direct and tangible interest in the vital statistic records being sought, namely the birth certificate of President Obama,” Ayabe wrote.

He cited Martin’s “lack of standing” and also ruled that Martin never legally served Lingle and state Health Department director Dr. Chiyome Fukino with a copy of the legal complaint.  What a faux pau. http://www.honoluluadvertiser.com/article/20081121/NEWS20/811210355/1001/localnewsfront

Andy Martin says, ‘Our great national tantrum is over; our great national nightmare is just beginning.’His columns are also posted at www.ContrarianCommentary.blogspot.com; www.contrariancommentary.wordpress.com. Martin is the author of Obama: The Man Behind The Mask, published in July 2008, see www.OrangeStatePress.com. Martin goes further to say “it’s time for the Republican Party to slim down its playbook, and concentrate on the vital issues where Barack Obama is likely to stumble over the next two years. Martin calls for al “all-American Republican Party” for “all-Americans” with every American welcome and “no outcasts.”

Berg and Donofrio are up next to bat for the request for Obama’s long form, vaulted birth certificate and question of eligibility.  Berg v Obama and Donofrio v Wells are floating around SCOTUS. A Dec 1 deadline for Berg and a Dec 5 conference scheduled for the Donofrio case.  For a background on these cases visit https://ahrcanum.wordpress.com/2008/11/20/obamas-birth-certificate-and-citizenship-goes-to-conference-at-supreme-court/ .

The pitch hitter in this Obamagate game of deception may be former Presidential Candidate, Alan Keyes who joined the fight to release President-elect Barack Obama’s birth certificate this week, suing to keep the California Electoral College from meeting. http://www.thebulletin.us/site/index.cfm?newsid=20202575&BRD=2737&PAG=461&dept_id=576361&rfi=8  The writ of mandamus can be found here http://www.tomshakely.com/bulletin/final_writ_keyes_v_bowen.pdf.  What is Keyes motive for the filing?  Truth or Revenge?  Is Keyes a sore loser remembering that in 2004, he lost his bid for a U.S. Senate seat in Illinois to none other than Barack Obama?

To date the evidence as provided by Obama seems compelling.  That— the President-Elect was born in the Kapi’olani Medical Center for Women and Children, in Honolulu, Hawaii, on Aug. 4, 1961- Hawaii was a state at that time. Sen. Obama’s mother, Ann Dunham, who died in 1995, was an American by birth. She was from Wichita, Kansas. His [sic- alleged] dad, Barack Obama, Sr., was from Kenya. His parents divorced in 1964. In 1967, Obama moved to Indonesia with his stepfather, Lolo Soetoro and his mother. In 1971, he returned to Hawaii, to live with his grandparents, Madelyn and Stanley Dunham, who raised him. Obama’s father died in 1982.  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barack_Obama#Early_life_and_career  Sounds all good and true doesn’t it?  Oops- we we can’t verify where he was born exactly, nor his citizenship because he will not produce his birth certificate and is wasting the courts precious time by not doing so. 

Not being able to verify his citizenship means we can not verify his qualification of eligibility for President.  Article II, Section 1 of The U.S. Constitution- “No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President…”   Today’s post from Citizen Wells “Electoral College facts, Obama not eligible, Electors must vote per US Constitution, Faithless Electors, Federal Election Laws, State Laws, Elector pledges, States and Electors must uphold US Constitution”  http://citizenwells.wordpress.com/2008/11/21/electoral-college-facts-obama-not-eligible-electors-must-vote-per-us-constitution-faithless-electors-federal-election-laws-state-laws-elector-pledges-states-and-electors-must-uphold-us-constitu/ is an awesome display of what not producing a birth certificate, and verifying your eligibility can cause. 

Martin may have struck out after a fairly valiant effort, but the game is on.

Advertisements

Read Full Post »

Obama’s Birth Certificate and Citizenship Goes to Conference at Supreme Court

Justice is alive and well in this country.  Leo Donofrio’s case that has been submitted to the U.S. Supreme Court regarding Obama’s citizenship has drawn the attention of Justice Clarence Thomas.  The case has been “distributed for conference,” on December 5, 2008. 

Donofrio argues that it is Secretary of State Wells of New Jersey job to verify eligibility for elections and uphold constitutional integrity. “She accepted the certifications of nomination from both major parties under the assumption that both candidate parties were eligible, but she did nothing to verify such eligibility.”  The entire brief is good reading and dispels conspiracy theory and can be found at http://www.blogtext.org/userFiles/naturalborncitizen/ScotusStayAppBrief.doc

The United States Supreme Court scheduled the case – Leo C. Donofrio v. Nina Mitchell Wells, Secretary of State of the State of New Jersey US Supreme Court Docket No. 08A407 – for a conference of the nine Justices.  If four of the nine Justices vote to hear the case in full review, oral argument may be ordered.  The conference is scheduled for December 5, 2008, ten days before the meeting of the Electoral College. The case originally sought, pre-election, to have the names of Barack Obama, John McCain, and Roger Calero removed from New Jersey ballots, and for a stay of the “national election” pending Supreme Court review of whether those candidates were eligible under the Constitution as natural born Citizens, as is required by Article 2, Section 1, Clause 5 of the Constitution of the United States.  On Nov. 19, the case was docketed for full conference of all nine Justices and scheduled for December 5, 2008  http://www.blogtext.org/naturalborncitizen/

Republican Candidate John McCain was born in Panama, Roger Calero, Socialist Worker Party was born in Nicaragua, and Barack Obama has not provided proof to a court where he was born. 

Phil Berg is a lawyer who has raised issue specifically with Obama’s birth certificate not being authentic and has filed numerous court proceedings in an effort to force Obama to produced it. http://dockets.justia.com/docket/court-paedce/case_no-2:2008cv04083/case_id-281573/   Taking his plea to the U.S. Supreme Court, a writ of certiorari was pending with a response due by December 1, 2008.  A response to the court was issued by the FEC- Federal Elections Committee  http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_R-l1iejogZw/SSR7kdEbCqI/AAAAAAAABmg/TD8yPv-ltZk/s1600-h/Berg+v+Obama+–+Waiver.bmp where the docket shows that the respondents have waived their right to respond,  filed November 18, 2008.  Ummm, so where is the response from the DNC and Obama himself who are also named in the suit?  Should there even be a separate response?  The writ extends to December 1, 2008 for a response and in the Berg case the FEC filed for relief separately and I believe separate responses are warranted in this case as well. 

The FEC in Berg v Obama is outline here  http://dockets.justia.com/docket/court-paedce/case_no-2:2008cv04083/case_id-281573/ specifically, The FEC claims it has no oversight in the Constitution’s Presidential Election Qualifications clause. http://docs.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/pennsylvania/paedce/2:2008cv04083/281573/28/ and the judge agreed dismissing the motion specifically against the FEC and all others.

http://www.americasright.com/2008/11/us-supreme-court-decisions-on-berg.html Outlines a look at possible collusion on the part of the FEC, DNC, and Obama, and notes specifically “FEC’s attorney, Gregory Garre, is with the Solicitor General’s office, and does not represent Obama or the DNC. While attorneys acting on behalf of a group of defendants or respondents is not necessarily rare, the difference here is the involvement of the Solicitor General’s office, a federal office.”  How the Court and Berg interpret this, will more than likely impact the outcome of the case.  I think it quite comical that the FEC distances itself from candidates at every turn unless there are Republican dollars at stake in choosing only to review McCain’s campaign finances, and not Obama’s .

Obama hired the Washington Law Firm Sandler, Reiff & Young to represent him against Berg.  One of the lawyers filing the motion to dismiss was Joe Sandler who is also a legal representative for CAIR- Council for American Islamic Relations with reported terrorist ties.  CAIR is suspect at best, for being funded by terrorists of Hamas thru the Holy Land Foundation. https://ahrcanum.wordpress.com/2008/10/20/sandler-vs-berg-for-obama-citizenship/  Obama in the long run may have rely on his newly appointed Attorney General, Eric Holder who is familiar with controversy from serving in the Clinton Administration. http://cbs2chicago.com/topstories/obama.eric.holder.2.867982.html

Where is the MSM, Main Stream Media in all of this?  ABC, NBC, CBS, FOX, and CNN, are all ignoring the Supreme Court cases that challenge Obama’s eligibility and instead are focusing on his future cabinet picks assuming he is meets the qualifications, and focusing on Internet messages from Al Qaeda’s number-two commander, Ayman alZawahri that call Obama and Secretaries of State Colin Powell and Condoleezza Rice, “house negroes.”  Venomous words to be sure, but it what would be equally venomous is to have a President in office that is not qualified based on his citizenship.

Obama can not continue to hide behind a COLB, Certification of Live Birth that remains unverifiable.  http://fightthesmears.com/articles/5/birthcertificate or can he, if he pleads the fifth?  https://ahrcanum.wordpress.com/2008/11/12/obama-could-plead-the-5th-amendment-on-citizenship/

God Bless America.

Read Full Post »

I think Barry and Michele Obama would be great dinner guests.  Our kids could play together and the dogs could sniff each other while we talk of being great citizens over a glass of wine, except that it of course will never happen.  Whatever questions we might ask, surely they would be answered in the same scripted response we have come to expect from The Obama’s.  Perhaps statements like, “I plead the fifth on that issue,” or, “I’ll have to talk to my attorney” would be dominate the conversation while we ate sweet potato pie. 

Having been served with numerous lawsuits regarding his citizenship I find it the epitome of irony that neither Michelle LaVaughn Robinson Obama https://www.iardc.org/ldetail.asp?id=514560103 nor her husband, Barry Baraq Mohammad Hussein Dunham Sotero Obama, Jr https://www.iardc.org/ldetail.asp?id=318304718 are currently authorized to practice law.    Obama worked nine years at Davis Miner Barnhill & Galland, a 12-lawyer firm that specialized in helping develop low-income housing. The firm’s top partner, Allison S. Davis, was, and is, a member of the Chicago Plan Commission, appointed by Mayor Daley. Davis was also a friend of Tony Rezko. Rezko’s who was found guilty on 16/24 felony counts was denied his appeal for a new trial on Nov. 13, 2008. http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/local/chicago/chi-rezko-trial-blotternov13,0,6810451.story 

“The senator, relatively inexperienced in this kind of work, was assigned to tasks appropriate for a junior lawyer,” according to an e-mail from Obama spokesman Robert Gibbs. “These tasks would have included reviewing documents, collecting corporate organizational documents, and drafting corporate resolutions.”  http://www.suntimes.com/news/metro/353829,CST-NWS-rez23.article  I suppose that after nine years of secretarial type duties one would certainly be frustrated and pursue a political career instead.  

With cases pending in the Courts seeking to certify his eligibility, they have hired the Washington Law Firm Sandler, Reiff & Young.  One of the lawyers filing motions to dismiss was Joe Sandler, formerly the in-house council at DNC.  Maybe his name rings a bell?  Joe Sandler, esq., is also a legal representative for CAIR- Council for American Islamic Relations.  https://ahrcanum.wordpress.com/2008/10/20/sandler-vs-berg-for-obama-citizenship/

Case after case has been dismissed in all jurisdictions against Obama, with few exceptions. Most notably, Berg vs Obama and Martin vs Hawaii.  The lesser known case is Donofrio vs Nina Mitchell Wells, New Jersey Secretary of State asking her to certify Obama’s eligibility on the ballot.  http://origin.www.supremecourtus.gov/docket/08a407.htm

No. 08A407  
Title:
Leo C. Donofrio, Applicant
v.
Nina Mitchell Wells, New Jersey Secretary of State
Docketed:  
Lower Ct: Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division
  Case Nos.: (AM-0153-08T2application)
~~~Date~~~  ~~~~~~~Proceedings  and  Orders~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Nov 3 2008 Application (08A407) for stay pending the filing and disposition of a petition for a writ of certiorari, submitted to Justice Souter.
Nov 6 2008 Application (08A407) denied by Justice Souter.

Donofrio claims that SCOTUS clerk, Danny Bickell did not present his Stay Application to Justice Thomas, when it appears that he had every right to do so –“Rule 22(1) clearly states that any application addressed to a particular Justice will be filed with the clerk and transmitted promptly to the Justice in question if that Justice has authority to grant the relief being sought,” Donofrio said. “Now, while I didn’t expect Justice Souter to grant the application, Rule 22(4) states that denial of a stay allows for resubmission to a Justice of your choice, and I was ready to resubmit it to Justice Thomas.”  http://www.americasright.com/2008/11/second-eligibility-related-action.html  Donofrio’s case history and updates can be found at Donofrio’s blog http://www.blogtext.org/naturalborncitizen/topic/8700.html

Lest Attorney Andy Martin be out of the lime light, instead of focusing his energy on his own case and search for Obama’s vaulted birth certificate, has written a letter to the PA Supreme Court Disciplinary Board to to investigate the conduct of attorney Philip J. Berg. http://contrariancommentary.wordpress.com/2008/11/12/anti-obama-attorney-philip-j-berg-faces-disciplinary-complaint/  “There have been a lot of questions, and criticism, swirling around Mr. Berg’s behavior,” Martin stated. So much for mutual respect.

Berg sought to disbar and remove Justices”… on the 1st anniversary of the U.S. Supreme Court decision in Bush vs. Gore which “anointed” Bush as President writes to three (3) U.S. Supreme Court Justices, Justices O’Connor, Scalia and Thomas requesting that they agree to “Voluntary Disbarment” for failing to “recuse” themselves in said case and other violations. http://www.votermarch.org/BergPet.htm 

Another lawsuits is rumored from Vice presidential Candidate Wiley S. Drake Sr.  asking to de-certify Barack Obama because he has refused to release proof of being a Natural Born Citizen, thereby disqualifying Obama in his bid for the Office http://obambi.wordpress.com/2008/11/03/vice-presidential-candidate-wiley-s-drake-sr-to-file-in-court-asking-to-de-certify-barack-obama-because-he-has-refused-to-release-proof-of-being-a-natural-born-citizen-thereby-disqualifying-obama-i/ but I have yet to see any actual legal proceeding on the net.  

 I am proud of these Americans who continue to question President Elect Obama’s citizenship and protect our Constitution. It reminds me of Michelle Obama proclaiming that for “the first time” in her adult life,” she was proud of America, as she spoke during a rally to support her husband’s presidential bid.  http://www.bostonherald.com/news/national/politics/2008/view.bg? and http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/02/20/maybe-they-dont-want-to-change/?ex=1361250000&en=9d564dff2b7ab130&ei=5088&partner=rssnyt&emc=rss  Stan Hewitts Town Hall has the audio here http://hughhewitt.townhall.com/MediaPlayer/AudioPlayer.aspx?ContentGuid=9e3a08aa-ad84-46cf-8492-6aff289bca42 

How proud both Michelle and Barry as former attorney’s must be, to be so entrenched in Court proceedings through out the land.  In her thesis she wrote how she is determined to “utilize all of my present and future resources to benefit [the black] community first and foremost.”   http://www.suntimes.com/news/metro/221458,CST-NWS-mich21.article.

Her thesis “Princeton Educated Blacks and The Black Community” is available courtesy of  http://obamaprincetonthesis.wordpress.com/

It’s too bad the Barack family is not using all of its resources to give benefit to all Americans.  Obama himself could end the charades in showing us his official, vaulted, original birth certificate before the family, Obama’s mother-in-law, and the new dog move into the White House and he takes the Oath of Office.  Obama is not going to show anyone anything unless a court of law demands it and as I mentioned in a previous post, he can just take the fifth and not incriminate himself.  https://ahrcanum.wordpress.com/2008/11/12/obama-could-plead-the-5th-amendment-on-citizenship/

I wonder if any one will question the citizenship of the dog?

Lest anyone need reminding, “We are a government of the people, by the people, for the people.”   Abraham Lincoln in his Gettysburg Address, 1863.

Read Full Post »

I do not wear tinfoil on my head and I voted for That (Other) One.  I will have to swallow my pride and support the office when he puts his hand on the Bible [and it better not be the Koran] when taking the Oath of Presidency but, I need to know now, that I am standing behind man and a country that is being led by an honest to God, American citizen that meets the qualifications of the office regarding his citizenship status – and the U.S. Supreme Court has asked the same.  

At  http://myiq2xu.wordpress.com/2008/10/11/who-gives-a-fuck-about-obamas-birth-certificate/ the author asks, ” Who gives a f^^k about Obama’s birth certificate?” and says in the post “in regards to his birth certificate, it is not relevant to Barack Obama’s qualifications for President.”  and that “accurate answers to the questions are still none of our business.” 

It is my business and it better be everyone’s business to know the citizenship of our Presidency, I after all have standing and want accurate answers.  I fail to see how circumventing the U.S. Constitution’s clear indicators of qualification for the Office is an acceptable reason to have voted for him or support him and until such proof is offered that, beyond any reasonable doubt, in a court of law, and specifically the US Supreme Court of Law, that he is a U.S. Citizen. 

…..directly under Article II, Section 1, Clause 4 of the Constitution—to require that anyone standing for “the Office of President” must verify his eligibility for that position, at least when serious allegations have been put forward that he is not eligible, and he has otherwise refused to refute those allegations with evidence that should be readily available if he is eligible. That “Case[ ]” is one the Constitution itself defines. And the Constitution must be enforceable in such a “Case[ ]” in a timely manner, by anyone who cares to seek enforcement, because of the horrendous consequences that will ensue if it is flouted.  http://www.newswithviews.com/Vieira/edwin84.htm Edwin Viera, Jr. 

Acceptance of web pages like factcheck as providing factual information are suspect at best, especially when there Obama has ties to the Annenberg political Group with long standing ties to William Ayers.  http://www.factcheck.org/  I can write it here on the web and make official notification to the world that I am the King of my back 50, but that doesn’t make it so -although my children think it to be true.  Obama’s own web site displays his COLB- certificate of live birth but that doesn’t make it so either.  In a court of law, only physical evidence is admitted.  Thanks again to Al Gore for inventing the Internet.  rofl.

A week after the election and the silence of MSM- Main Stream Media in regard to Obama’s citizenship lawsuits is beyond reprehensible and leads one to ask, is there really freedom of the press?  In the media’s defense, if they tick off the President Elect, they will not have any more questions to ask or scoops on the Obama Administration.  At That One’s first press conference, he called on numerous media groups but failed to call on a reporter from Fox News.  Imagine that.  http://current.com/items/89510124/fox_news_snubbed_at_obama_s_first_press_conference.htm 

Neither Berg or Martin have made many headlines, let alone the case of Dr. T.B Bradley, Psy, D.,  who formally applied to the Court for leave to intervene in Case 2:08-cv-04083-RBS Document 16 filed October 7, 2008 http://nationalwriterssyndicate.com/index2.php?option=com_content&do_pdf=1&id=767  or the suit by Leo Donofrio against the New Jersey Secretary of State who “assumed” Omaba as qualified.   http://www.blogtext.org/naturalborncitizen/ It claims “To be a naturally born citizen, this is the issue.  You are either “born” one or you are not, and if not, you can’t be President.  The 14th Amendment can make one a “citizen” but not a “natural born citizen”.  This is the backbone of my case.  Had the US legislature, and the States who ratified the 14th Amendment, sought to bestow “natural born citizen” status, then the 14th Amendment would say so, but it does not.  It confers “citizen” status, and only if the person is subject to the jurisdiction of the United States. ” Find more in the UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT Docket #: 08A407. and at http://www.democratic-disaster.com//index.php?topic=286.0  He references the Movant Papers which are based on a Constitutional issue, that it is proper for the US Supreme Court to review the case http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2129827/posts and it all may end up on Justice Clarence Thomas’ lap.

Should Obama make the Presidential “Oath or Affirmation” of office in full knowledge that he is not a natural born Citizen he will have committed a crime of perjury for being ineligible for the Office -Article II, Section 1, Clause 8) since he cannot “faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States.”  “I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my Ability preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.” http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Article_Two_of_the_United_States_Constitution#Clause_6:_Vacancy_and_Disability

Besides having committed perjury it may very well be proved that he usurped the Office of Presidency which would be a criminal act under Title 18, United States Code, Section 242.  http://www.fbi.gov/hq/cid/civilrights/statutes.htm#section242  http://www.usdoj.gov/crt/crim/242fin.php  thus having deprived citizens the right to vote for whom, at the time of the election, constituencies assumed Obama had met the qualification to become President that is secured and protected by the Constitution and laws of the U.S.   Did Obama deprive me of my guaranteed right?  The Courts will tell.

Where is his birth certificate?  Here we have a President Elect that lays claim that he is going to share as much information as he can with the American people and yet, he can not share his simple birth certificate with out being forced by a court of law.  Taking it all the way to The Supreme Court, Justice Davis Souter has requested that Obama provide unmitigated proof of citizenship to the court by December 1, 2008, in the case Berg v Obama.  

So as not to incriminate himself, or the DNC who have propped him up as their candidate and in an effort to hide behind laws, I wonder if President Elect Obama will plead the 5th in a refusal to testify against himself  http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/Plead+the+Fifth and defy the U.S. Supreme Court and people like you and me who actually do “give a f^^k”.

Read Full Post »

colb1

 

09 NOVEMBER 2008: Supreme Court Of The United States (SCOTUS) Supreme Court Justice David Souter has agreed that a review of the federal lawsuit filed by attorney Phil Berg against Barack Hussein Obama II, et al., which was subsequently dismissed for lack of standing is warranted. SCOTUS Docket No. 08-570..  Berg’s petition for an injunction to stay the November 4th election was denied, but the Clerk also required the defendants to respond to the Writ of Certiorari, which I believe, requires the concurrence of four justices, by December 1, 2008. 

The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that people like me and the others who want to know the origins of Barack Obama’s citizenship are not stupid, and the Court it appears to want to see Obama’s birth certificate too.  There is nothing in the main stream media about Berg vs Obama or Martin vs Hawaii and until it is, we have remained on the fringe until being vindicated, at least a little bit.  It seems when talking about Obama’s citizenship that people don’t know a thing, they believe it is a lie or they are following the pursuits of justice to determine his eligibility.  For millions of voters, any citizenship questions they may have had were laid to rest long ago but to others, questions still remain and poignantly is, why President Elect Obama will not just show us his vaulted birth certificate? 

Groups like fact check have show us what is called a ‘re-issued’ certificate, often called by the states a certificate of live birth or a COLB.  A COLB normally passes for a birth certificate and is just as good unless questions arise. A comparison between the two documents can be found here. http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_R-l1iejogZw/SQLJZbuSVXI/AAAAAAAABKM/9B2p–yZzDw/s1600-h/Obama+COLB.jpg

Berg’s web site headlines “U. S. SUPREME COURT AWAITS RESPONSE TO BERG’S WRIT OF CERTIORARI FROM OBAMA, DNC and Co-DEFENDANTS For   For Immediate Release: – 11/07/08 http://www.obamacrimes.com/  “I look forward to receiving defendant Obama’s response to the writ and am hopeful the U. S. Supreme Court will review Berg v. Obama. I believe Mr. Obama is not a constitutionally-qualified natural-born citizen and is ineligible to assume the office of President of the United States.”

Rule 11 as noted by the Supreme Court seems to make it clear that Justice Souter’s granting of a review on the Writ of Certiorari is not a right entitled to citizen Phil Berg, but rather is a matter of judicial discretion based upon a compelling reason. The compelling reason is the Constitutional requirement that no person except a natural born citizen shall be eligible to the office of President.

As I understand it, what this means is that on or before December 1, 2008 Barack Hussein Obama must respond to the writ of certiorari.  The Berg v Obama case really is really about a whole list of 56 questions regarding Obama’s place of birth. http://quipster.wordpress.com/2008/10/11/56-questions-obama-refuses-to-answer-about-citizenship/

The Rule of 11 http://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frcp/Rule11.htm (4) the denials of factual contentions are warranted on the evidence or, if specifically so identified, are reasonably based on belief or a lack of information.  I can not imagine that as a Harvard Law Graduate and as President Elect that Obama would ignore such a request from the Justices of the Supreme Court and he will be compelled to provide a vault copy his original birth certificate.  In what is called a writ of mandamus to do so, they have absolutely no legal basis to refuse an order of the Supreme Court of the United States.

If Obama fails to do present his birth certificate, surely the Justices would be remiss in being defied.  They will then have to decide what to do about a President-elect who refuses to prove his natural-born citizenship.  Will Obama be held in contempt of court?  The Court may in fact, accept his COLB and in the long run issue a dismissal, citing that the responsibility of eligibility lies in Congress. We have already seen claims by The Federal Election Committee that it is not responsible for proof of eligibility

http://fightthesmears.com/articles/5/birthcertificate  posts his COLB but even that doesn’t’t prove even that is real, only that there is no credible evidence that it is a fake.  The raised seal and authoritative signature needed to validate the document cannot be seen on the scan http://web.israelinsider.com/Articles/Politics/12939.htm.  His campaign has a burden of proving otherwise and his website says that, “Smears claiming Barack Obama doesn’t have a birth certificate aren’t actually about that piece of paper — they’re about manipulating people into thinking Barack is not an American citizen.” Without that that little piece of paper, my friend- the fringe will not be convoluted into believing Obama is an American Citizen and that our Constitution will remain in crisis.  

While Martin has a case that is on the docket in Hawaii for November 18, 2008, there is a million dollar reward for anyone who can provide Obama’s birth certificate https://ahrcanum.wordpress.com/2008/11/09/obamas-birth-certificate-one-million-dollar-reward/ and a petition- Stop the Obama Constitutional Crisis with a reported 80,000+ signatures –the site got those signatures with out the help of ACORN!.   http://www.rallycongress.com/constitutional-qualification/1244/stop-obama-constitutional-crisis/ 

“I can see a unanimous Court (en banc) decertifying the election if Obama refuses to produce his birth certificate,” says Raymond S. Kraft, an attorney and writer. “They cannot do otherwise without abandoning all credibility as guardians of the Constitution. Even the most liberal justices, however loathe they may to do this, still consider themselves guardians of the Constitution. The Court is very jealous of its power – even over presidents, even over presidents-elect.”  Kraft is a contributor to http://www.familysecuritymatters.org/publications/id.1614/pub_detail.asp

Most citizens, including myself will support the office and pray that should Obama pass through the Electoral collage and take the Oath of Presidency that his decisions yield the best four our future.  With more than a month and a half until Obama takes that Oath, we need a rational conclusion to make a rational judgment that he is in fact eligible.  The final judgment could be be influenced by any chaos that could result from de-certifying and voiding the election.  Found wrong or right, Berg and the American people could loose, even if he is right. 

What could be so hard about that, unless you have no birth certificate to present.

Read Full Post »