Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Posts Tagged ‘Berg v Obama’

“Glenn Beck insults Americans, military, US Constitution, Citizen Wells red phone challenge!

Unlike Lou Dobbs, who on CNN of all places, asked the basic journalistic question, why doesn’t Obama present a legitimate birth certificate, Glenn Beck, on his radio  and Fox TV show has insulted millions of concerned Americans. Many of these Americans are current and retired military and quite a few high ranking officers. Beck often talks out of one side of his mouth about upholding the US Constitution, while at the same time insulting Americans exercising their First Amendment rights.

Three concerned Americans, Philip J Berg, a lifelong Democrat, former ambassador Dr. Alan Keyes and Charles F Kerchner, USNR Commander, all requested Obama’s college records using legal channels and were opposed by Obama attorneys.

Glenn Beck, if you have any questions or corrections to make about this video, you can call
me on the dedicated phone (Mickey Mouse red phone holding the cell phone).”

http://citizenwells.wordpress.com begins his most recent article this way:Why has Obama employed a legion of private and government attorneys to avoid presenting a legitimate birth certificate and college records?…Citizen Wells and millions of concerned Americans

Glenn Beck, et al, the above question is simple to answer, simple enough for a fifth grader. Lou Dobbs, while still at CNN, asked another simple question. Why doesn’t Obama just provide a legitimate birth certificate. However, Glenn Beck, the eligibility issues surrounding Obama appear to be too complex (or controversial) for you. You know, messy stuff like natural born citizen and the US Constitution. So I have decided to just focus on something real simple for you, something you can get your head around. Obama’s college records. That’s not too complex or controversial is it?

Glenn, perhaps even you at one time or another had to prove you attended a school.

Glenn Beck, you inspired me with the red phone you set up to receive calls from the Obama Administration. So I have dedicated a phone to receive calls from you. If anything I write or put in a video is incorrect, please call me anytime and let me know. The follow video, let’s call it a trailer for upcoming shows, presents some information regarding efforts to obtain Obama’s college records. I will be curious to know if you consider the three men referred to in the video as right wing idiots.  One of them is a retired military officer. You have insulted plenty of them in the past, so why not. Heck, you will probably call me an idiot. However, I must warn you, I fight back. I will not back down.

We sure as hell never expected Citizen Wells to ever back down!  GO WELLS.

Here’s a few of our older articles on Obama citizenship and records https://ahrcanum.wordpress.com/category/citizenship/ and one of our personal favorites https://ahrcanum.wordpress.com/2009/03/27/obamas-illuminati-ponzi-of-the-dollar/ 

  flag tounge 

Open wide, say ahhh and check out more posts from Ahrcanum! 

Our Swine Flu Report that began in April is at https://ahrcanum.wordpress.com/swine-flu-report     

Shaking, rattling and rolling into the conspiracy, truth and science of EARTHQUAKES, HAARP, EISCAT, Tesla, etc., with more posts at https://ahrcanum.wordpress.com/earthquakes-haarp/  

Help spread the word.  SUBSCRIBE  NOW and Follow us on Twitter (by clicking in the side margin)  so you can get the latest updates as soon as they’re posted. Make sure to retweet, so all your friends get the heads up too. 

Read Full Post »

Tenacious:  1 a: not easily pulled apart : cohesive<a tenacious metal> b: tending to adhere or cling especially to another substance <tenacious burs>2 a: persistent in maintaining, adhering to, or seeking something valued or desired <a tenacious advocate of civil rights> <tenacious negotiators> b: retentive <a tenacious memory>  . Webster.

Tenacious is Phil Berg.  Whatever one’s opinion of Berg, he is still at the doors of The Supreme Court looking for answers regarding President Obama’s natural born citizenship issues which remain unresolved to some, even after the inauguration.
As Obama can attest to-if at first you don’t succeed, try again in the statement of The Oath of Office, Berg keeps trying again and again at The Supreme Court to find out the truth in Obama’s genealogy that would prove or disprove his eligibility to hold the Office of Presidency.
Perhaps it is just protocol or maybe the merits of the case will be considered prior to their being a judgment made, but The Free Republic http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2177262/posts  posting from PACER shows-02/02/2009 Open Document CLERK ORDER referring the Response of Appellant to Appellee Federal Election Committee’s Motion for Summary Affirmance to the merits panel, filed. SEND TO MERITS PANEL. (CH) [emphasis from posting]

Berg’s case is still alive-barely.

http://wthrockmorton.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/joyce_anderson-amicus-final.pdf  for docket No. 08-570  Berg v Obama  

If all other actions fall through, apparently Philip Berg  plans on filing a Petition for Writ of Quo Warranto (be sure to read the linked wikipedia article)  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quo_warranto], challenging qualifications for President.

 

Props to the Right Side of Life who keeps track of all the legal filings regarding Obama’s citizenship.  http://www.therightsideoflife.com/?page_id=1518 and here http://www.therightsideoflife.com/?p=3371

Tenacious indeed, Mr. Berg.

Read Full Post »

Efforts to stay the Obama Inauguration continue, even as we are only hours from swearing him in as our next President.

Last week, President George W. Bush enacted an Executive Order providing for, in part, “Re-investigating Individuals in Positions of Public Trust.” Stating, “It is necessary to re-investigate individuals in positions of public trust in order to ensure that they remain suitable for continued employment.” http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2009/01/20090116-1.html

Based on this Executive Order, people will no doubt continue to interpret Obama’s suitability- including a response to the Order, http://drorly.blogspot.com/2009/01/new-action-filed-by-orly-taitz-esq.html  from attorney Orly Taitz who has filed on behalf of Ambassador Dr. Alan Keyes, Wiley S. Drake and Markham Robinson, on the issue of legitimacy for presidency of Barack Hussein Obama, aka Barry Obama aka Barry Soetoro.

Like others before her, she is suing Obama yet again, to prove he meets the qualifications specified for the Office of the President of the United States as set forth in the Constitution, which includes that he must be a “natural born” citizen, having sole allegiance to the United States as required to become Commander in Chief. 

In part, “pray this Court will determine that the inauguration set for January 20, 2009 should be stayed pending the outcome of this, and similar litigation, determining that the Plaintiff has a substantial likelihood of success on the merits, that under Article II, Section 1 and Amendment 20 Section 3 of the U.S. Constitution, Defendant Barack H. Obama is not a natural born citizen and has not qualified,…”  I wouldn’t expect a ruling today. Chief Justice Roberts will be busy swearing in Obama.

Attorney Philip Berg , has sent a 2nd letter to Oprah, stressing that she is one that can have Obama withdraw his name to avoid damage to racial relations in the U.S. for years to come.  http://citizenwells.wordpress.com/

Opera must be laughing her ass off like the rest of us.  Throw in Andy Martin and it is a three ring circus.  In a recent release Martin says, “The Obama’s are the most vulgar, nouveau rich family to ever occupy the White House. Our long national hangover is now beginning; we just don’t realize it yet.”  http://www.pr-inside.com/andy-martin-says-the-obamas-are-r1011343.htm  Tell me how you really feel Mr. Martin.

Even lower than low, we have this letter to Michelle Obama, ” I have enclosed a physical description of your husband’s genitals. I ask you to, publicly state that the enclosed description is not accurate. I also ask you to take questions concerning your personal knowledge of your husband’s sexual encounters with the murdered Donald Young, myself and other men over the course of your marriage….Then let’s be open and transparent.” by Lary Sinclair and posted at http://obambi.wordpress.com/2009/01/17/letter-to-michelle-obama-by-larry-sinclair/

Boys and girls.  This is gross.  It is one thing to question someones past but it is quite another to get the man’s penis involved, wherever it has gone.  I don’t care if it has gone where no man has gone before- we are getting down to plain old slander here.  Leave the man’s dick out of politics- it leaves a sour taste.

If the courts of the law haven’t seen fit to allow one, just one, freaking case to proceed to require Obama to show his legal birth records, then either the attorneys have failed in their job or justice has failed.

For whom among us has standing to question the Constitution?  When it comes to the natural born citizen clause, no one at this time has the authority, as formally entered into record by Judge Surrick in Berg v Obama, et al which is reviewed here http://www.americasright.com/2008/10/lawsuit-against-obama-dismissed-from.html .

The Joint Congressional Committee on Inaugural Ceremonies has themed the Obama inauguration, “A New Birth of Freedom.” http://inaugural.senate.gov/  The bill for this new birth may hit $150 million!  Although Obama is spending our tax dollars, he did not accept funds from corporations, lobbyists, unions or political action committees’ instead, large donations from Wall Street have poured in making the list a who’s who in hedge fund managers with people like George Soros and D.E. Shaw Group’s David Shaw. http://www.finalternatives.com/node/6656 

Lincoln couldn’t fathom the dollars nor the fact that we know more about him than our next President.  Lincoln was involved in more than 5,100 cases in Illinois alone during his 23-year legal career.  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abraham_Lincoln  We’ve had plenty of time to fully vent Mr. Obama yet, how many cases has Obama has tried?  What do his college transcripts reveal? What does his birth certificate say?

In the next four years we will come to know his views and aspirations, but President Obama will be defined by his actions.  Obama is the heir apparent and for the sake of our nation, while we can watch and criticize- today he will be number 44- President Barack Hussein Obama.

Obama has asked us to “Join in the work of remaking this nation the only way it’s been done in America for two-hundred and twenty-one years – block by block, brick by brick, calloused hand by calloused hand.”  http://www.patrolmag.com/arts/1215/dear-jon-favreau

In his inaugural address, George H.W. Bush announced, “My first act as president is a prayer. I ask you to bow your heads.”  What will Obama have to say?  Stay tuned…

God Bless America.

God Bless President Barack Hussein Obama

Read Full Post »

According to the Wall Street Wire of the Wall Street Journal, “President-elect Barack Obama and Vice President-elect Joe Biden will visit the U.S. Supreme Court today after an invitation was extended by Chief Justice John Roberts. [sic 01142009]

This is the third time in modern history that a president-elect and vice-president elect have made pre-inaugural stops to the court—Bill Clinton and Al Gore visited the court on Dec. 8, 1992 and Ronald Reagan and George H.W. Bush visited the court on Nov. 19, 1980.

Obama and Biden will meet with Roberts and the associate justices in the ceremonial West Conference Room, and are expected to take a tour of the court. The event is private and closed to the press. ”  http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2009/01/14/obama-and-biden-to-meet-with-supreme-court-justices/#comment-289510

Chief Justice Roberts is scheduled to officiate the swearing in of Obama on January 20, 2008 , but lingering court cases regarding Obama’s citizenship have been shuffling around the Supreme Court.  All have been denied or denied without judgment, so far.  Still, cases are pending.  Perhaps this is a perfect opportunity, behind closed doors for the Justices to ask Obama if he is qualified under our Constitutional Law, to hold the office of President.  Maybe they will ask him but even if they do, I doubt we would ever be privileged to the answer.   

Obama said, “I was a constitutional law professor, which means unlike the current president, I actually respect the Constitution”  but then again we have to ask how does Obama propose to protect and defend a document he believes to contain a “fundamental flaw”? 

I have a pair of Hawaiian flip flops for sale if anyone is interested. 

Wheresyourevidence is a site that has been keeping up on must of the the legal challenges regarding his citizenship. The site  has been challenged by some as being run by Obama’s legal team.  http://tesibria.typepad.com/whats_your_evidence/the-natural-born-citizenship-clause-updated.html.

Read Full Post »

Obama’s eligibility appears to be a go go from The Supreme Court.  Oh no, no, no some will say.  Numerous court cases have challenged President Obama’s natural born citizenship under Article II, Section 1 of the United States Constitution that says that the president be a “natural born citizen.”  All have been met with the same outcome as today- Denied. 

Phil Berg originally filed his suit against Obama and others way back in August.  It has taken five months to get the official word from the Supremes that his petition for certiorari is denied before judgment.  It should come as no surprise that  The Court offered no explanation but note the court said, denied before judgment.  http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_R-l1iejogZw/SWtjunekRMI/AAAAAAAAB7I/QNmswBBRZcQ/s1600-h/Berg+Cert+Denial.bmp  Humph, denied should be denied, but ya never know. 

It did allow, “The Motion for Bill Anderson for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae is granted.”   (http://www.techlawjournal.com/glossary/legal/amicus.htm ) I wonder what relevant matter not already brought to the Court’s attention he could offer?  The Anderson brief in its entirety can be found here  http://wthrockmorton.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/joyce_anderson-amicus-final.pdf  and also at  http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2145354/posts  The meat and bones of the amicus is—

“The amicus is a citizen of the State of Arizona and an elector of that state for elector for President of the United States. He voted in the general election held by the State of Arizona on November 4, 2008. This Court has in fact recognized that the amicus has an interest in this type of case. See United States v. Newman, 238 U.S. 537, 547, 35 S.Ct. 881, 883, 59 L.Ed. 1446, 1450 (1915); and the same holds true for the petitioner. Ibid. Your amicus submits that it will not be possible for this Court to dispose of this case properly without considering the following points which either have not been brought to the attention of this Court by the parties or which have not been adequately discussed: 1.) This Court is not facing a question of the constitutional aspects of standing, but a question pertaining to the prudential considerations only; and, 2.) The lack of an adequate remedy following the inauguration of Barack Obama, 2 and the potential civil and military crises which could arise therefrom, crises that could not be readily addressed by the ordinary processes of the law, must be considered in addressing the prudential aspects of standing; and, 3.) With respect to the prudential considerations of standing, certain aspects of this case are analogous to the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur.”

Jeff Schreiber of America’s Right http://www.americasright.com/ has shared his insights into the Berg case with objectiveness and professionalism.  He was  in the Clerk of Court’s office in the Federal Courthouse in Philadelphia doing part of his job as a legal writer and reading the civil cases that had been filed that day including Berg’s.  I encourage any reader here to follow his blog and note Berg’s recent reaction to the denial.  I look forward to his thoughts on Anderson.

Truth In our Time and numerous bloggers are convinced that,  “Courts throughout the USA aided and abetted the usurpation of the Presidency by refusing to hear cases challenging the citizenship of Barack Obama, now, major media is doing the same thing.”  Citing network news refusal to broadcast a commercial questioning his citizenship- the video can be viewed at the site  http://www.truthinourtime.com/2009/01/obama-citizenship-commerical.html.

Does Obama have divided loyalties?  I doubt it.  Really, the minute Obama would act to place Kenya or Indonesia above the best interests of the USA, the wrath of the domestic and foreign media, Congress, the Senate and even Nancy Pelosi would jump to attention and outrage.  Wouldn’t they? 

Is Obama factually eligible?  I don’t know.  http://www.obamaconspiracy.org/2009/01/natural-born-citizenship-for-dummies/ offers a pretty good glance at the issues but still no solution.  Perhaps the entire language of what makes one an American is extinct and moot.  A large reference to citizenship cases and notations can be found at http://tesibria.typepad.com/whats_your_evidence/the-natural-born-citizenship-clause-updated.html.

Whatever the evidence may bear in the future, on January 20, 2009, Barack Hussein Obama is most likely going to place his hand on former President Lincoln’s Bible and swear to the duty of allegiance to the United States of America.   This bond will be administered by Chief Justice  Roberts who will carry out his ceremonial duty of swearing in the next President of the United States.  If Roberts was to consider the possibility that he is swearing in a man who doesn’t  meet fundamental eligibility requirements, I imagine he would be removed unceremoniously and rapidly from the bench.  Or perhaps made a hero to those who seek the legal means to force Obama’s citizenship discloure.  Maybe the failure to deny Anderson will be enough for pause.  Berg, Donofrio and others have certainly made their cases before the justices and while not hearing the cases formally, must be aware of Obama’s current question of ineligibility for the office he is about to be sworn into.

The Supremes have once again spoken in saying nothing,  and by leaving the Anderson Amicus hanging have further blurred the waters.   

Obama, by delivering his official birth records to support his compliance with the Constitution and his professed transparency in government would alleviate future burdens on The Court and her people.  I don’t think we can hold our breath that long.  Instead, we’ll watch a new chapter of American history unfold with a democrat, black man leading our destiny either for the next four or eight years, unless a court forces him to prove his citizenship and it turns out he is ineligible.  I pray for a sufficient bond of union between Obama and America to allow him to make worthwhile choices in keeping America the land of the free and home of the brave. 

God Bless America.

Read Full Post »

Sabotage- [sabuh-tahzh, sab-uhtahzh] http://www.essence.com/news_entertainment/news/articles/alankeyesobama

1. any underhand interference with production, work, etc., in a plant, factory, etc., as by enemy agents during wartime or by employees during a trade dispute.
2. any undermining of a cause.

–verb (used with object)

3. to injure or attack by sabotage.

from http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/Sabotaged

Make no mistake, Obama as President Elect needs to show his authentic, verifiable birth certificate and to not do so is an utterly and complete disgrace and sabotage of our U.S. Constitution.   America herself should be proud to move past racism in electing a black man.  There should be no praise for a man who can not move past the fact that some of those same people who elected him are now questioning his authority and qualifications under Article II, Section I that defines who may hold the office of President. 

No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.

What an embarrassment for our country to have let the issue of his citizenship and eligibility as President elect to have gotten this far .  The rest of the world must be snickering albeit silently, that the man they will have to deal with on international matters could be so manipulative to have deceived his own people to achieve his own goals of reform and change.  What other methods of deceit may come from an Obama administration?  

Denying his citizenship to the same people who propped him up is a slap in the face that will leave America stinging for years if we find out he is not a qualified U.S. Citizen.

In an interview with Essence Magazine http://www.essence.com/news_entertainment/news/articles/alankeyesobama former Presidential Candidate Alan Keyes discusses his lawsuit challenging Obama’s citizenship -KEYES: “I think politics is irrelevant to this, actually. I don’t see how it is showing fondness for Barack Obama to let him enter into office with a question that could be raised. He should not have to operate under that burden. I think the officials need to clear the air for his sake. From my point of view, it is a bad idea to have a president of the United States enter office with a cloud hanging over his head, where every time he tries to do something, he would end up frittering away time because of that objection. So let’s get it over with. Let’s resolve it and move forward with a clear an undisturbed mandate for the new president.”

Get it over with and move forward indeed.  Rather than Obama being a stand up guy, he himself has chosen to not show his authentic birth certificate.  In filing similar applications in all 50 states he, Barack Obama on his Rhode Island application states and “declares that he is eligible under the laws and Constitution of The United States to serve in the Office of The President of The United States if elected…”  http://steadyhabits.wordpress.com/2008/11/29/ct-sec-of-state-errs-hawaii-officials-did-not-verify-obama-birthplace/#comment-506 

[…] From Obama own website:
Since Sen. Obama has neither renounced his U.S. citizenship nor
sworn an oath of allegiance to Kenya, his Kenyan citizenship
automatically expired on Aug. 4,1982.”
Question?
How could it expire, if he never had it? [END]  http://wwwwakeupamericans-spree.blogspot.com/2008/11/obama-awol-birth-certificate-update.html 

This week on Dec 5, 2008- the Supreme Court will go into conference on Leo Donofrio vs Nina Mitchell Wells, Secretary of State of New Jersey, docket 08A47.  Donofrio, a retired poker player has put all his chips and gone all in to seek the truth of where Obama’s citizenship originated. I would send you to Donofrio’s website but the original at Word Press crashed and a second mirror site set up last week at www.naturalborncitizen.blogspot.com  reads “This blog is currently under review due to possible Blogger Terms of Service violations.  If you’re a regular reader of this blog and are confident that the content is appropriate, feel free to click “Proceed” to proceed to the blog. We apologize for the inconvenience.  You can see the docket at http://www.filesend.net/download.php?f=6873f11034a973b2eaff4a8fde87408e

I’d say it is an inconvenience indeed when your 1st Amendment rights keep getting slammed.  A universal avoidance of the mainstream media on this issue is suspect but shutting the doors to a simple blog is unequivocally, a loss for free speech.  I’d also say it is more than an inconvenience to have a President Elect Obama refuse to produce his birth certificate.

Shame on Obama and shame on the DNC and the RNC for allowing it to get this far. 

Whomever Obama is, I would add coward to the list.

Read Full Post »

Andy Martin isn’t done with Obama just yet.  He has filed another motion to the courts in Hawaii seeking Obama’s birth certificate.

MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF COURT’S

ORDER OF NOVEMBER 19, 2008

 

Preliminary Statement

The Court managed to take what is at its core a simple and straightforward case seeking review of denial of access to a Hawai’i record, and to add layers of confusion and complexity that were totally unwarranted by the record made in open court on November 18th. For the reasons that follow, Plaintiff moves the Court to reconsider, vacate and rehear the matters decided on November 19th using the correct procedures and standards of law.

Plaintiff initially thought that he would appeal the order to the Intermediate Court of Appeals, but it would be a disservice to that Court to appeal such a mangled and needlessly confused record from the trial forum. Thus, the Rule 59 motion (see below) stays any appeal until a decision on this motion.

 

Plaintiff is not aware if a judgment has been entered since he has not been served with any such document. Prior to entry of a judgment a Court has plenary power to review and reconsider an order.  http://www.contrariancommentary.com/community/Home/tabid/36/mid/363/newsid363/320/Default.aspx

 

Martin claims he did not get a judgment from the court? What? Hawaii Circuit Court Judge Bert Ayabe has dismissed Internet author Andy Martin’s lawsuit seeking to obtain a copy of President-elect Barack Obama’s Hawaii’i birth certificate.  The judge upheld arguments from Gov. Linda Lingle’s administration that Martin — a political opponent of Obama — had no standing under state law to obtain a copy of the document.  reported in http://www.honoluluadvertiser.com/article/20081121/NEWS20/811210355/1001/localnewsfront and previously written about here https://ahrcanum.wordpress.com/2008/11/21/obamas-birth-certificate-denied-to-andy-martin-again/

Whatever opinion you have about Andy Martin, one must admire his tenaciousness in seeking out the truth about Obama’s birth certificate and citizenship eligibility for the office of President. 

Read Full Post »

Obama’s Birth Certificate Conspiracy SR 511 and Faithless Electors

Of all the low down dirty deeds regarding Obama’s citizenship, I had forgotten all about Senate Resolution 511.  Before Obama’s www.fightthesmears.com even began to address lurking questions on Obama’s illicit associations with Ayers, Retzko, Wright and the citizenship issue with Berg v Obama at the Supreme Court or Donofrio v Wells scheduled for a SCOTUS conference on December 5, 2008, was SR 511. 

What started out as an effort to put to rest any objection to Senator John McCain’s eligibility to become our nation’s President because he was born outside of the U.S. in Panama, was in fact a preemptive strike to eliminate any claim that Obama might not be a natural born citizen either . A February NY Times article raised the question as to whether McCain, who was born in 1936 on a U.S. military installation in the Panama Canal Zone, satisfied the constitutional prerequisites to become president. Article II, Section 1 of the Constitution requires a president to be a natural born citizen.

“There are powerful arguments that Senator McCain or anyone else in this position is constitutionally qualified, but there is certainly no precedent,” Sarah H. Duggin, an associate professor of law at Catholic University who has studied the issue extensively, told the NYT. “It is not a slam-dunk situation.”  http://blogs.wsj.com/law/2008/04/11/clinton-obama-agree-mccains-a-natural-born-citizen/.

SR 511 is Constitutional Resolution that got slam dunked when it passed in April of this year (08). Obama’s congressional supporters – including Gov. Claire McCaskill (D-MOi), Senator Patrick Leahy (D-VT), Sen. Barack Obama (D-IL) Sen. Tom Coburn (R-OK), Sen. Hillary Clinton (D-NY), and Sen. James Webb (D-VA) –proposed and passed a Resolution (S.Res.511) entitled: Recognizing that John Sidney McCain, III, is a natural born citizen.  http://www.opencongress.org/bill/110-sr511/text.

S. Res.511 clearly states that “…Whereas the term `natural born Citizen’, as that term appears in Article II, Section 1, is not defined in the Constitution of the United States…”

Whereas, a natural born Citizen is not defined?  Hold your horses there and re-read.  Natural born citizen is not defined.  Hmmmmmmm? The bill states, ” Whereas previous presidential candidates were born outside of the United States of America and were understood to be eligible to be President…”  This piece of legislation was introduced, written and passed clearly with intent to extend the meaning of the Constitution, and prior to SR 511 there was no presidency in Congress.  

Mrs. Clinton’s support and co-authorship of this bill, even though they were battling in the primary election for the presidency, was so incredibly strategic and manipulative on Obama’s part that it borders on absolute fraud.  The bill completely attempts to redefine his citizenship and will try to keep him eligible, constitutionally as the 44th President, even after he finally shows his Official Vault Birth Certificate. 

Do you honestly think Obama wants Hillary Clinton to act as his Secretary of State?  Obama owes Hillary big time for sponsoring SR 511, and her nomination as SOS is payback.  He will put up with her, and torture her until he can no longer stand it or she will, herself – resign from the position. 

The Supreme Court may seek to grant Donofrio, Berg, and maybe even Keyes, a day in court and America may finally come to know the truth on Obama’s birth certificate.  It has been alleged his birth is in Kenya, he lost his citizenship in Indonesia, his mother was a minor when she gave birth, his dad was Frank Marshall, he is an illegal alien, blah, blah, blah- according to SR 511- the Democrats would have us believe Constitution was tossed by the wayside and no matter. 

Alas, in truth, “Simple resolutions do not require the approval of the other house nor the signature of the President, and they do not have the force of law.” http://www.senate.gov/legislative/common/briefing/leg_laws_acts.htm#4 

Whether or not we are ever witness to his birth certificate, the facts are fuzzy and circumspect that Obama may not be qualified to hold any office in the United States.  Would any elector who now votes for Obama may be found guilty of treason?  

The Electoral College meets on December 15, 2008 to issue an official election determination. The members of Congress who have sworn to uphold the U.S. Constitution and its laws – including the citizenship clause, will vote in January to either confirm or reject the vote of the Electoral College but Electors are not bound to cast their vote for the candidate presented. “Faithless Electors” are members of the Electoral College who, for whatever reason do not vote for their party’s designated candidate. Since the founding of the Electoral College, there have been 156 faithless Electors.  http://www.fairvote.org/e_college/faithless.htm Undoubtedly a faithless elector would run risk of censure and other political retaliation from his party.  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Faithless_elector  Can we depend on Joe Lieberman stand up again for what is right?  What one member of Congress has enough balls to stand up to question that the basic constitutional requirements for office have been met?    There is something totally wrong with relying on a Constitutional Crisis to satisfy our laws on eligibility.   http://www.ziitrend.com/predict/on/any_faithless_elector_s_in_2008_2008-11-04 is where you can vote or following the voting on whether or not there will be a Constitutional Crisis at all.  With 63% accuracy in the past, the current prediction is 70% favorable for a crisis.

Three is little doubt intelligence has been keeping a watchful eye court proceedings.  Would there be peaceful noncompliance, civil disobedience, Martial Law? 

This is not the change anyone had hoped for from Obama.

God Bless America.

Read Full Post »

Obama’s Birth Certificate Gets Forensic Report Amid Citizenship Lawsuits

Now, with Obama facing lawsuits demanding that he produce his “vaulted” original, long-form birth certificate to prove his citizenship, along with steadfastly refusing to present even a current, certified paper COLB, that would have settled the issue and only cost him $12 to obtain, we have reached a point in this saga where the folks at FactCheck and the Obama campaign are circling the wagons, still hoping against hope, that they can sweep under the rug, one of the greatest political frauds ever perpetrated in our nation’s history.” 

“Everyone born in this country has a birth certificate, so if Obama was born here, too, then he should have one. This isn’t rocket science. Yet, Obama is the only one, out of millions of natural born Americans, who refuses to show his original birth certificate to verify his citizenship status. Obama is also the only person and politician to ever submit a forged document image in place of a genuine, certified birth certificate, hoping that this act of fraud would go unnoticed.”

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2136816/posts has quotes like this and a HUGE, AWESOME BLOG POST of inaccuracies in what has been presented via Factcheck, the DailyKos, Politico and others as an authentic certificate of life birth from Barack Obama.  Free Republic makes a pretty good case that what has been shown to the American People by Obama, is in fact a forgery and fake document.  Ahrcanum knows of no lawsuit including Berg v Obama et al, or Donofrio v Wells that has of yet, required Obama to produce his legally, verifiable birth certificate. YET, being the key word.

The whole dream of democracy is to raise the proletarian to the level of stupidity attained by the bourgeois. Gustave Flaubert 

By now one would think the MSM- Main Stream Media would be hooting and hollering that our Constitution could be in crisis, but nary a word.  Coverage on the net is sparse and unless one is specifically looking for the topic hard to come by.  Many comments on sites that do cover his citizenship issue resemble this, “There is no reason to believe that Obama is not a natural born American citizen other than some people really, really, really want it to be otherwise. It’s pure crazy talk.” from http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/11/16/alan-keyes-files-lawsuit-over-obama-eligibility/  Have we become so dumbed down, so fast under Obama’s rise? 

The latest known filing is from Presidential Candidate Alan Keyes.  He spoke regarding apartheid, but the quote still has merit today ,”“I think it is racist to suggest that my mind should somehow be bound by black instead of reason,” Keyes later explained in a January 1996 interview with a reporter for The Philadelphia Inquirer. “I will follow reason, and reason has no color. It doesn’t have a skin.” http://www.buyingofthepresident.org/index.php/archives/2000/538/  At least we can eliminate race as a reason for the filing since both are accomplished black men.

In another case, Donald Sullivan, Lt Col, USAFR (Ret) is heading up a class action lawsuit, “This demand seeks specifically to verify through the office of the North Carolina Board of Elections, assisted by the Secretary of State, that Mr. Obama is a “natural born” citizen.”  Sullivan is no stranger to the NC Court nor Federal Court having sought relief from deployment previously.  http://www.aoc.state.nc.us/www/public/coa/opinions/2005/pdf/040600-1.pdf

Whatever: Mr. Keyes http://www.usjf.net/ , Mr. Berg http://www.obamacrimes.com/ , Mr. Donofrio http://thenaturalborncitizen.blogspot.com/, Mr. Martin’s http://www.contrariancommentary.com/community/ and many other citizen filings motives are in filing these lawsuits, the outcome serves in the best interest of all Americans to see that the person who holds the office of President, is in fact, eligible under our citizenship laws. Mr. Obama has been ducking like Muhammad Ali, and the last punch may come from the Supreme Court and Justice Thomas.  Obfuscation is a dance better left to boxing professionals, not politicians who profess change by deceit or the Main Stream Media, who ignore news.

“Obama clearly knows how to float like a butterfly,” said Alan Schroeder, who studies media and the presidency at Northeastern University, “but he needs to work on the sting-like-a-bee part.” http://www.ajc.com/opinion/content/news/stories/2008/09/23/obama_debate_style.html?cxntlid=inform_sr 

God Bless America.

Will Obama fly with his hive of Democratic appointments from the Clinton administration right on in to the White House?  The courts, time and truth will tell. 

“I know where I’m going and I know the truth, and I don’t have to be what you want me to be. I’m free to be what I want.”
Muhammad Ali

Read Full Post »

Obama’s Birth Certificate Denied to Andy Martin AGAIN

Game on.  Obama’s Birth Certificate vs Current Court Proceedings. Last inning, bottom of the ninth.  Only two batters to go as Andy Martin has struck out. Berg and Donofrio are up next at SCOTUS.

Hawaii Circuit Court Judge Bert Ayabe has dismissed Internet author Andy Martin’s lawsuit seeking to obtain a copy of President-elect Barack Obama’s Hawai’i birth certificate.  The judge upheld arguments from Gov. Linda Lingle’s administration that Martin — a political opponent of Obama — had no standing under state law to obtain a copy of the document.

Martin “does not have a direct and tangible interest in the vital statistic records being sought, namely the birth certificate of President Obama,” Ayabe wrote.

He cited Martin’s “lack of standing” and also ruled that Martin never legally served Lingle and state Health Department director Dr. Chiyome Fukino with a copy of the legal complaint.  What a faux pau. http://www.honoluluadvertiser.com/article/20081121/NEWS20/811210355/1001/localnewsfront

Andy Martin says, ‘Our great national tantrum is over; our great national nightmare is just beginning.’His columns are also posted at www.ContrarianCommentary.blogspot.com; www.contrariancommentary.wordpress.com. Martin is the author of Obama: The Man Behind The Mask, published in July 2008, see www.OrangeStatePress.com. Martin goes further to say “it’s time for the Republican Party to slim down its playbook, and concentrate on the vital issues where Barack Obama is likely to stumble over the next two years. Martin calls for al “all-American Republican Party” for “all-Americans” with every American welcome and “no outcasts.”

Berg and Donofrio are up next to bat for the request for Obama’s long form, vaulted birth certificate and question of eligibility.  Berg v Obama and Donofrio v Wells are floating around SCOTUS. A Dec 1 deadline for Berg and a Dec 5 conference scheduled for the Donofrio case.  For a background on these cases visit https://ahrcanum.wordpress.com/2008/11/20/obamas-birth-certificate-and-citizenship-goes-to-conference-at-supreme-court/ .

The pitch hitter in this Obamagate game of deception may be former Presidential Candidate, Alan Keyes who joined the fight to release President-elect Barack Obama’s birth certificate this week, suing to keep the California Electoral College from meeting. http://www.thebulletin.us/site/index.cfm?newsid=20202575&BRD=2737&PAG=461&dept_id=576361&rfi=8  The writ of mandamus can be found here http://www.tomshakely.com/bulletin/final_writ_keyes_v_bowen.pdf.  What is Keyes motive for the filing?  Truth or Revenge?  Is Keyes a sore loser remembering that in 2004, he lost his bid for a U.S. Senate seat in Illinois to none other than Barack Obama?

To date the evidence as provided by Obama seems compelling.  That— the President-Elect was born in the Kapi’olani Medical Center for Women and Children, in Honolulu, Hawaii, on Aug. 4, 1961- Hawaii was a state at that time. Sen. Obama’s mother, Ann Dunham, who died in 1995, was an American by birth. She was from Wichita, Kansas. His [sic- alleged] dad, Barack Obama, Sr., was from Kenya. His parents divorced in 1964. In 1967, Obama moved to Indonesia with his stepfather, Lolo Soetoro and his mother. In 1971, he returned to Hawaii, to live with his grandparents, Madelyn and Stanley Dunham, who raised him. Obama’s father died in 1982.  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barack_Obama#Early_life_and_career  Sounds all good and true doesn’t it?  Oops- we we can’t verify where he was born exactly, nor his citizenship because he will not produce his birth certificate and is wasting the courts precious time by not doing so. 

Not being able to verify his citizenship means we can not verify his qualification of eligibility for President.  Article II, Section 1 of The U.S. Constitution- “No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President…”   Today’s post from Citizen Wells “Electoral College facts, Obama not eligible, Electors must vote per US Constitution, Faithless Electors, Federal Election Laws, State Laws, Elector pledges, States and Electors must uphold US Constitution”  http://citizenwells.wordpress.com/2008/11/21/electoral-college-facts-obama-not-eligible-electors-must-vote-per-us-constitution-faithless-electors-federal-election-laws-state-laws-elector-pledges-states-and-electors-must-uphold-us-constitu/ is an awesome display of what not producing a birth certificate, and verifying your eligibility can cause. 

Martin may have struck out after a fairly valiant effort, but the game is on.

Read Full Post »

Older Posts »