I do not wear tinfoil on my head and I voted for That (Other) One. I will have to swallow my pride and support the office when he puts his hand on the Bible [and it better not be the Koran] when taking the Oath of Presidency but, I need to know now, that I am standing behind man and a country that is being led by an honest to God, American citizen that meets the qualifications of the office regarding his citizenship status – and the U.S. Supreme Court has asked the same.
At http://myiq2xu.wordpress.com/2008/10/11/who-gives-a-fuck-about-obamas-birth-certificate/ the author asks, ” Who gives a f^^k about Obama’s birth certificate?” and says in the post “in regards to his birth certificate, it is not relevant to Barack Obama’s qualifications for President.” and that “accurate answers to the questions are still none of our business.”
It is my business and it better be everyone’s business to know the citizenship of our Presidency, I after all have standing and want accurate answers. I fail to see how circumventing the U.S. Constitution’s clear indicators of qualification for the Office is an acceptable reason to have voted for him or support him and until such proof is offered that, beyond any reasonable doubt, in a court of law, and specifically the US Supreme Court of Law, that he is a U.S. Citizen.
…..directly under Article II, Section 1, Clause 4 of the Constitution—to require that anyone standing for “the Office of President” must verify his eligibility for that position, at least when serious allegations have been put forward that he is not eligible, and he has otherwise refused to refute those allegations with evidence that should be readily available if he is eligible. That “Case[ ]” is one the Constitution itself defines. And the Constitution must be enforceable in such a “Case[ ]” in a timely manner, by anyone who cares to seek enforcement, because of the horrendous consequences that will ensue if it is flouted. http://www.newswithviews.com/Vieira/edwin84.htm Edwin Viera, Jr.
Acceptance of web pages like factcheck as providing factual information are suspect at best, especially when there Obama has ties to the Annenberg political Group with long standing ties to William Ayers. http://www.factcheck.org/ I can write it here on the web and make official notification to the world that I am the King of my back 50, but that doesn’t make it so -although my children think it to be true. Obama’s own web site displays his COLB- certificate of live birth but that doesn’t make it so either. In a court of law, only physical evidence is admitted. Thanks again to Al Gore for inventing the Internet. rofl.
A week after the election and the silence of MSM- Main Stream Media in regard to Obama’s citizenship lawsuits is beyond reprehensible and leads one to ask, is there really freedom of the press? In the media’s defense, if they tick off the President Elect, they will not have any more questions to ask or scoops on the Obama Administration. At That One’s first press conference, he called on numerous media groups but failed to call on a reporter from Fox News. Imagine that. http://current.com/items/89510124/fox_news_snubbed_at_obama_s_first_press_conference.htm
Neither Berg or Martin have made many headlines, let alone the case of Dr. T.B Bradley, Psy, D., who formally applied to the Court for leave to intervene in Case 2:08-cv-04083-RBS Document 16 filed October 7, 2008 http://nationalwriterssyndicate.com/index2.php?option=com_content&do_pdf=1&id=767 or the suit by Leo Donofrio against the New Jersey Secretary of State who “assumed” Omaba as qualified. http://www.blogtext.org/naturalborncitizen/ It claims “To be a naturally born citizen, this is the issue. You are either “born” one or you are not, and if not, you can’t be President. The 14th Amendment can make one a “citizen” but not a “natural born citizen”. This is the backbone of my case. Had the US legislature, and the States who ratified the 14th Amendment, sought to bestow “natural born citizen” status, then the 14th Amendment would say so, but it does not. It confers “citizen” status, and only if the person is subject to the jurisdiction of the United States. ” Find more in the UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT Docket #: 08A407. and at http://www.democratic-disaster.com//index.php?topic=286.0 He references the Movant Papers which are based on a Constitutional issue, that it is proper for the US Supreme Court to review the case http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2129827/posts and it all may end up on Justice Clarence Thomas’ lap.
Should Obama make the Presidential “Oath or Affirmation” of office in full knowledge that he is not a natural born Citizen he will have committed a crime of perjury for being ineligible for the Office -Article II, Section 1, Clause 8) since he cannot “faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States.” “I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my Ability preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.” http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Article_Two_of_the_United_States_Constitution#Clause_6:_Vacancy_and_Disability
Besides having committed perjury it may very well be proved that he usurped the Office of Presidency which would be a criminal act under Title 18, United States Code, Section 242. http://www.fbi.gov/hq/cid/civilrights/statutes.htm#section242 http://www.usdoj.gov/crt/crim/242fin.php thus having deprived citizens the right to vote for whom, at the time of the election, constituencies assumed Obama had met the qualification to become President that is secured and protected by the Constitution and laws of the U.S. Did Obama deprive me of my guaranteed right? The Courts will tell.
Where is his birth certificate? Here we have a President Elect that lays claim that he is going to share as much information as he can with the American people and yet, he can not share his simple birth certificate with out being forced by a court of law. Taking it all the way to The Supreme Court, Justice Davis Souter has requested that Obama provide unmitigated proof of citizenship to the court by December 1, 2008, in the case Berg v Obama.
So as not to incriminate himself, or the DNC who have propped him up as their candidate and in an effort to hide behind laws, I wonder if President Elect Obama will plead the 5th in a refusal to testify against himself http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/Plead+the+Fifth and defy the U.S. Supreme Court and people like you and me who actually do “give a f^^k”.
Ahrcanum. Latin origin Arcanus. Mysterious, having special knowledge, information accessible or possesed only by the initiate. Secrets revealed.
Ahrcanum 
The President-elect is more than qualified and eligible to be sworn into office next month.
In other developing countries, such as Obama’s fraud the appropriate immediate penalty is by Firing Squad. This would shock any attempt by groups exploiting the situation. He must have been briefed already regarding the security of our Nation.
Sadly, this and his Selective Service Fraud will get swept under the rug and Barry Soetoro will ruin this country with his Socialist/Marxist (with Islamic Principle) Ideas. It will be interesting when he tries to instill the Sharia Law. It is already accepted in parts of Canada and parts of Europe. Google it if you want to know about it. I’m sure the GVT will let him be president rather than let 50% (or maybe less) of his voters riot in the street if he is removed. Remember, this was a Coup De’taut not an election. CNN reported the day after the “Election” that they had been prepping him for Months. Guess they knew something that we didn’t. Steps have already been taken to make sure that Philip J. Berg’s Case doesn’t stand up in the Supreme Court, and the Obama Camp will be doing the same with Alan Keyes case. He will win Georgia with his goons fixing the vote there as well. For every 1 Legal vote, he will match with 2 or more Illegal votes. This is how he ran Raila Odinga’s election in Dec 2007. (Rigged Elections and Media Bias). The people of Kenya (Barry’s Hometown) found out afterwards and there was 3 months of Bloodshed before a new President was installed. Odinga stayed on as his advisor to quell the bloodshed. Look this stuff up. I think he was practicing for the US election here in the US. Not everyone drank Odinga’s Kool-aid, but more than half drank Obama’s. I hope America is not lost, but it is his Fixed GVT and Money against the people. Either we will be miserable like the people under Moussolini, or we will have a 2nd Civil War. Where are the FBI, CIA, NSA, Police and all other GVT agencies on this? They probably think that America Needs a Wake Up call. Well, this will be it. His Civilian National Defense Force will keep the people at bay and Re-Educated. The Fairness Doctrine will make sure that the TV and Radio Media only tells us what they want us to hear. USSA. United Socialist States of America. Maybe Texas will succeed and we can all live there. Maybe Australia and England will take us as Refugees. I pray to God every day while I am still allowed to.
While I am not mainstream media, a few thousand a day visit here daily to seek out the dirty little secrets that are hidden from network news or buried in the back pages. True, the Supreme Court may dismiss all of Obama’s citizenship cases, but somewhere out there is the truth.
It is not true that Justice David Souter asked for Obama’s birth certificate. That information comes only from Berg, and he is wrong. The Supreme Court judges only on laws and constitutional issues. It does not consider evidence, so it would not ask to see evidence.
If Berg wins his case (most unlikely), the SC would send the case to a lower court to determine the facts of Obama’s birth, and the court might ask for the original birth certificate, or it might not, holding that the certification of real birth is good enough.
Berg is apparently getting a lot of hopes up.
Now some other critics of Obama are questioning Berg.
This document is apparently from Andy Martin, another critic of Obama, who points out some of Berg’s failings.
You can find it at:
http://actionsbyt.wordpress.com/2008/11/11/andy-martin/
ANDY MARTIN
Monday, November 10, 2008
The strange behavior of Philadelphia lawyer Philip J. Berg
Why would a Philadelphia lawyer file frivolous claims in federal courts about Barack Obama? Is it possible the lawyer is trying to divert attention from serious questions that exist about Obama’s birth certificate and troubled and confusing family history?
Andy Martin speculates on the bizarre litigation behavior of Philadelphia lawyer Philip J. Berg
ANDY MARTIN
Executive Editor
http://contrariancommentary.blogspot.com/
“Factually Correct, Not
Politically Correct”
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:
PHILADELPHIA LAWYER PHILIP J. BERG SAYS HE IS AN OPPONENT OF BARACK OBAMA; IS HE?
BERG’S PROFESSIONAL MISCONDUCT RAISES QUESTIONS ABOUT HIS MOTIVES AND COMPETENCE.
(NEW YORK)(November 11, 2008) Some time in mid-August I began to get phone calls from a lawyer’s office in Philadelphia. The lawyer was Philip J. Berg.
I eventually spoke with Mr. Berg. He explained that he was preparing to file a lawsuit against Barack Obama and a number of other parties. Berg asked if I would review the case before it was filed, and I agreed.
I carefully read Berg’s initial complaint. (Some of the confirming e-mails are in the hands of Patriot Brigade Talk Radio Network.) I advised Berg’s office that his lawsuit would not fly in federal court. His joinder of the Federal Election Commission was utter nonsense. Naming the Democratic Party was questionable. Seeking to enjoin the Party’s convention was silliness. For an ordinary voter to sue Obama was a lost cause; I explained that already this year two judges had ruled individuals lacked legal standing to file such a claim. Berg sent me a revised version of his lawsuit that was equally deficient.
Berg has tried to pretend that his lack of “standing” is a technicality. On the contrary, in federal courts standing is a threshold jurisdictional issue. State courts have broad “general” jurisdiction. Federal courts are courts of limited jurisdiction. I explained to Berg how he could file a meritorious lawsuit in state court but he was frantic. “I want to file before the Democratic Convention so I can apply for an injunction,” he said. At that point I decided Berg was a loon and had no further contact.
Mr. Berg did file his loony case, and it began to attract a lot of attention. My initial reaction was sadness at the gullibility of the public. People obviously had no idea that the form and forum of Berg’s lawsuit were totally deficient.
I did not become concerned until a New York radio talk show host who is a friend called me and said “Andy, what about the order for Obama to produce his birth certificate?” I explained to my friend that there was no such order. Berg and his supporters were spreading disinformation or allowing it to be disseminated.
I began receiving more calls and e-mails about Berg’s lawsuit. Berg was escalating the idiocy of his behavior to attract frustrated voters. “Obama admitted he was born in Kenya,” screamed one Berg release. Obama had admitted nothing of the sort. The more irresponsible Berg became, the more e-mail he generated from desperate voters.
Berg’s lawsuit was promptly dismissed, as I had anticipated before it was even filed. Berg was ready with an explanation: there was a conspiracy to deprive him of justice. No such conspiracy existed.
Last month my staff and I discussed whether we should do a column about Berg’s harmful behavior. We decided to ignore him and hope he would go away. Mr. Berg is not going away. He keeps manufacturing false claims to stay in the news and to keep soliciting money.
After Berg lost in the district court, he filed an appeal to the U. S. Court of Appeals. But there was no “juice” in a mere appeal. Berg was soon asking the U.S. Supreme Court to stop the national election—on the basis of his crackpot lawsuit. Once again Berg was denied relief. And once again Berg was ready with a new round of disinformation.
I started to get e-mails telling me the Supreme Court had ordered Obama to produce a birth certificate. No such order existed. The Rules of the Supreme Court allow thirty days to respond; Berg converted that into an “order” from the Court compelling his opponents to respond. Sheer disinformation. There was no “order.”
The false claims about the Supreme Court are what convinced me to reverse my earlier view and write a column questioning Berg’s behavior.
Enough, Mr. Berg.
What’s next from him? What ridiculous claim will he concoct to continue attracting attention?
During this entire period of idiotic behavior Berg was going on talk radio and soliciting funds for his doomed mission.
What should all of this teach us? I have several thoughts for the reader to consider.
First, no one is more opposed to Barack Obama and his hard left warriors than I am. Obama’s minions were not attacking Berg during the campaign; they were attacking me. I was the first one to focus attention on Obama’s evasiveness and deception, four years ago. But while I have attacked Obama, I have also worked hard to anchor all of my claims in evidence, interviews and traditional forms of legal research. That’s what really scares Obama.
When I asked Berg in August how he was going to prove Obama was born in Kenya, he said “I saw it on the Internet.” Not good enough for a federal judge.
Second, Berg likes to identify himself as a “supporter” of Hillary Clinton. That’s garbage. He’s smearing Clinton. Clinton must cringe every time Berg does some new stunt and misuses her name. Berg has no connection with Clinton. More misuse.
Third, is Berg’s motive to collect money from frustrated voters? I don’t know. He does ask for cash, so that may be the explanation. To be sure, my Committee also receives donations, but we have funded two trips to Hawai’i for Obama research and investigation, and a birth certificate lawsuit scheduled for a hearing on November 18th in Honolulu.
Fourth, could Berg be professionally incompetent? Berg has been criticized by judges: http://www.law.com/jsp/article.jsp?id=1122023117263
http://systocracy.com/Bergmalpracticetwo
Click to access 05D0679P.pdf
Click to access 05d0521p.pdf
Finally, is Berg really an Obama operative? Berg’s behavior is so far outside the normal confines of legal practice that his conduct is aberrant as well as abhorrent. To date, only Obama has benefited from Berg’s misbehavior. When an Obama opponent acts crazy, Obama’s people say “See.”
There are very legitimate questions about Obama’s birth certificate and family history. By filing frivolous cases (a case filed in the wrong court seeking the wrong relief against the wrong defendants is frivolous) and misusing legitimate issues, Berg obscures the seriousness of the underlying questions about Obama’s past. And, inevitably, journalists link Berg and others (such as myself) together, despite the fact that we have absolutely no connection. I, for one, do not enjoy being joined to Berg in any form, even a news story. http://www.thebulletin.us/site/index.cfm?newsid=20193200&BRD=2737&PAG=461&dept_id=576361&rfi=8
Likewise, Berg’s use of Clinton’s name benefits Obama by discrediting Clinton as a possible behind-the-scenes Berg supporter, when nothing could be further from the truth. Dirty tricks? Obama and Axelrod are masters of smears by association and deception. Although I am not an enthusiastic believer of the Berg-for-Obama explanation for Berg’s behavior, it still makes a lot of sense.
Certainly no competent attorney who regularly practices in federal court would engage in Berg’s hijinks. At some point Berg could face sanctions for his misconduct and abusive behavior.
So we are left with no clear explanation for why Berg is acting out: (1) is he “crazy” or ill? (2) is he an Obama saboteur? (3) is he a financial flim flam artist using false claims to collect money? (4) is he an incompetent attorney? I can’t say for sure which of those apply. I leave it to the good reader’s common sense to reflect on Berg’s behavior and to decide for him or herself just what Berg’s motivation is.
Helping the anti-Obama movement is not Berg’s mission. Quite the opposite. Berg has helped Obama by discrediting Obama’s opponents. So what is Berg’s game? Let me know what you think.
end quote
Does anybody care? doea anybody read your column? Why are not any NEWS MEDIAS reporting any of this????? even FOX – not a word anywhere….. Where are all the people to have a voice against this supposedly imposter – why does even SNOPES claim he has submitted a birth certificate that qualifies him? I do not believe that Supreme Court will do anything about this at all…….We are doomed to this marxist leadership and it NOT BE GOOD for our country.
Thank you for your wonderful post & the new links I found within. I must admit there have been times when I wondered if the “tin foil” charge had some validity. After reading this, I can take a deep breathe now and continue the good fight.