Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Posts Tagged ‘Barack Hussein Obama’

obama-joker-poster_133x195

A poster featuring President Barack Obama portrayed as Heath Ledger’s famous Joker are surfacing in the  Los Angeles with “socialism”  beneath him.

The Obama Joker poster is showing up on off-ramps and underpasses in Hollywood, California. Whomever made and distributed copies of the poster has chosen so far to remain anonymous.  Due props to the mysterious man or woman.

Miles away, California’s largest fire was a 4,600-acre blaze burning in Stanislaus National Forest in Tuolumne County this week. http://blog.taragana.com/n/dozens-of-northern-california-wildfires-force-evacuations-injuries-reported-129280/ 

While the hell fire of politicians spread anger, disgust and solutions on everything from health care, Swine Flu and disputing the Obama Kenyan birth certificate, the beat goes on in Nancy Pelosi territory and all of America. 

Who is John Galt?

Who is Barack Hussein Obama?

A joker in disguise?

Advertisements

Read Full Post »

Omaba Kenya BC

From birthers to plain old Americans who still believe in the Constitution of The United States of America that says that a president must be a natural born citizen, it sure would be nice to know the truth about President Obama’s birth certificate records.

Now comes the emergence of a Kenyan birth certificate from Orly Taitz. 

HuffPost has disputes its authenticity as does Karl Rove, saying:

  • Kenya was a Dominion the date this certificate was allegedly issued and would not become a republic for 8 months.
  • Mombasa belonged to Zanzibar when Obama was born, not Kenya.
  • Obama’s father’s village would be nearer to Nairobi, not Mombasa.
  • The number 47O44– 47 is Obama’s age when he became president, followed by the letter O (not a zero) followed by 44–he is the 44th president.

sourced- http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/08/03/kenyan-birth-certificate_n_249850.html

Hawaii issued another statement last week claiming that they have President Obama’s authenticated copy- alas no original as they made the switch to electronic documents years ago.

Read Full Post »

The O tactics are shoving socialism right down America’s throat, and I for one am choking. 

“Top executives at firms receiving extra-ordinary help from U.S. Taxpayers will have their compensation capped at $500,000.  A fraction of the salaries that have been reported recently”, said Obama. 

Say goodbye to capitalism.  In trying to improve everyone’s life, our new government under Mr. O will dictate how much money you can make. The government prints the money, is turning our banks toward national ownership and is taking another step toward socialism by limiting earnings. 

Obama’s team is giving away too many pieces of the pie.  Obama’s foremost adviser, his wife Michelle, said, “Most Americans don’t want much. Folks don’t want the whole pie.  Most Americans feel blessed to thrive a little bit. But that’s out of reach for them…someone is going to have to give up a piece of their pie so someone else can have more,”  transcribed from Glenn Beck at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zgc4zm3XrBc

It is more than just a redistribution of pie.  Wake the frig up- where has Mrs. Obama been to say that we feel blessed to thrive just a little bit?  Why go to work if your earning potential is limited and you have to feed everyone else while you do the work? 

Not only do I want all of my pie President & Mrs. Obama, but I want my cake and I want to eat it too.  I want to eat my pie on my terms, every last stinking crumb seeing as it was my hard earned paycheck that I alone earned to buy the pie in the first place.  I cashed it, I got the taxes taken out and I have the right to keep it all to myself; that is my prerogative.  Democracy is supposed to give me the right to share my pie, not require me.

In other news the stimulus bill which will take away more slices of my pie is making progress in the Senate.  “The bill is quite the cross between an over-decorated Christmas tree and an over-stuffed sausage, but that is to be expected.” http://finaxyz.blogspot.com/2009/02/stimulus-bill-progressing-through.html .

Forget dessert, pass the meatloaf.

Read Full Post »

Close enough, but no cigar with regards to President Obama taking the Oath of Office as the 44th President.

The Constitution requires:  “I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.”   The Constitution requires that he is a natural born citizen as well, but the jury is still out on that one .

With less than five minutes into Obama’s Presidency, the first flub of the Constitution began with Chief Justice John Roberts saying the oath incorrectly.  Obama caught it and gave Roberts a moment to recover but still did not do it right.

The oath includes the phrase “That I will faithfully execute the office of president of the United States” but Roberts didn’t say “faithfully” until after saying “president of the United States.”  http://www.nypost.com/seven/01202009/news/politics/roberts_flubs_swearing_in_oath_151047.htm

They are simple words and yet on this most historic of days, already our Constitution is thrown side for a statement that is close enough.  I thought close enough only counted in the game of horse-shoes.  

“I, Barack Hussein Obama,” totally jumped the gun and cut off Chief Justice Roberts before he had completed the line.  It didn’t help when he called Obama as “Senator”.   When the noon is passed, the President-elect automatically becomes President without taking oath.   Calling him Senator was only the first mistake.

See the video of the swearing in of Obama at- http://blog.coincidencetheories.com/?p=962 .  The text can be found at http://blogs.abcnews.com/theworldnewser/2009/01/the-inuagural-o.html  

In post news analysis, Fox News noted that Obama may have not completed the oath as required by the Constitution but more than likely, Justice Roberts would throw out any case against him.  I can’t wait to hear what Rush Limbaugh has to say since last weeks commentary, “”I’ve been listening to Barack Obama for a year-and-a-half. I know what his politics are. I know what his plans are, as he has stated them. I don’t want them to succeed,” he said. http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5hxpMXOB6U__wIxx8Cub3uWAR6kPg 

Obama and Roberts are, after all, becoming close associates, only last week Obama got a tour of the Supreme Court in a closed session.  Lingering court cases regarding Obama’s citizenship have been shuffling around the Supreme Court for months.  All have been denied or denied without judgment, so far.   https://ahrcanum.wordpress.com/2009/01/14/obama-meets-with-supreme-court-justices/  I find it an insult to justice and pretty stinking crappy that a judge would meet behind closed door with a defendant in a lawsuit- even if that man would be Obama.

Wasting no time,  http://www.whitehouse.gov/ the White House’s main web page is all Obama.  http://www.whitehouse.gov/about/presidents/georgewbush/ President George Bush has been relegated to the list of  previous presidents.  From the site, “The Bush family also includes two dogs, Barney and Miss Beazley, and a cat, Willie.”  Surely it must have pissed of President William Clinton, aka Slick Willie, to have had a cat named after him living in the White House.

The amusing footnote in history is noted, let’s  move on.

Since the Main Street Media is so stuck on the fact that a black man has been elected and sworn in at President, I thought I’d take a moment to remind readers that President Barack Hussein Obama, is half white.   Whatever his skin color, I pray he leads us toward safety and prosperity, preferably without our having to pay more taxes and redistributing what little bit of wealth we have left.

God Bless America

Read Full Post »

According to the Wall Street Wire of the Wall Street Journal, “President-elect Barack Obama and Vice President-elect Joe Biden will visit the U.S. Supreme Court today after an invitation was extended by Chief Justice John Roberts. [sic 01142009]

This is the third time in modern history that a president-elect and vice-president elect have made pre-inaugural stops to the court—Bill Clinton and Al Gore visited the court on Dec. 8, 1992 and Ronald Reagan and George H.W. Bush visited the court on Nov. 19, 1980.

Obama and Biden will meet with Roberts and the associate justices in the ceremonial West Conference Room, and are expected to take a tour of the court. The event is private and closed to the press. ”  http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2009/01/14/obama-and-biden-to-meet-with-supreme-court-justices/#comment-289510

Chief Justice Roberts is scheduled to officiate the swearing in of Obama on January 20, 2008 , but lingering court cases regarding Obama’s citizenship have been shuffling around the Supreme Court.  All have been denied or denied without judgment, so far.  Still, cases are pending.  Perhaps this is a perfect opportunity, behind closed doors for the Justices to ask Obama if he is qualified under our Constitutional Law, to hold the office of President.  Maybe they will ask him but even if they do, I doubt we would ever be privileged to the answer.   

Obama said, “I was a constitutional law professor, which means unlike the current president, I actually respect the Constitution”  but then again we have to ask how does Obama propose to protect and defend a document he believes to contain a “fundamental flaw”? 

I have a pair of Hawaiian flip flops for sale if anyone is interested. 

Wheresyourevidence is a site that has been keeping up on must of the the legal challenges regarding his citizenship. The site  has been challenged by some as being run by Obama’s legal team.  http://tesibria.typepad.com/whats_your_evidence/the-natural-born-citizenship-clause-updated.html.

Read Full Post »

Obama’s eligibility appears to be a go go from The Supreme Court.  Oh no, no, no some will say.  Numerous court cases have challenged President Obama’s natural born citizenship under Article II, Section 1 of the United States Constitution that says that the president be a “natural born citizen.”  All have been met with the same outcome as today- Denied. 

Phil Berg originally filed his suit against Obama and others way back in August.  It has taken five months to get the official word from the Supremes that his petition for certiorari is denied before judgment.  It should come as no surprise that  The Court offered no explanation but note the court said, denied before judgment.  http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_R-l1iejogZw/SWtjunekRMI/AAAAAAAAB7I/QNmswBBRZcQ/s1600-h/Berg+Cert+Denial.bmp  Humph, denied should be denied, but ya never know. 

It did allow, “The Motion for Bill Anderson for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae is granted.”   (http://www.techlawjournal.com/glossary/legal/amicus.htm ) I wonder what relevant matter not already brought to the Court’s attention he could offer?  The Anderson brief in its entirety can be found here  http://wthrockmorton.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/joyce_anderson-amicus-final.pdf  and also at  http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2145354/posts  The meat and bones of the amicus is—

“The amicus is a citizen of the State of Arizona and an elector of that state for elector for President of the United States. He voted in the general election held by the State of Arizona on November 4, 2008. This Court has in fact recognized that the amicus has an interest in this type of case. See United States v. Newman, 238 U.S. 537, 547, 35 S.Ct. 881, 883, 59 L.Ed. 1446, 1450 (1915); and the same holds true for the petitioner. Ibid. Your amicus submits that it will not be possible for this Court to dispose of this case properly without considering the following points which either have not been brought to the attention of this Court by the parties or which have not been adequately discussed: 1.) This Court is not facing a question of the constitutional aspects of standing, but a question pertaining to the prudential considerations only; and, 2.) The lack of an adequate remedy following the inauguration of Barack Obama, 2 and the potential civil and military crises which could arise therefrom, crises that could not be readily addressed by the ordinary processes of the law, must be considered in addressing the prudential aspects of standing; and, 3.) With respect to the prudential considerations of standing, certain aspects of this case are analogous to the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur.”

Jeff Schreiber of America’s Right http://www.americasright.com/ has shared his insights into the Berg case with objectiveness and professionalism.  He was  in the Clerk of Court’s office in the Federal Courthouse in Philadelphia doing part of his job as a legal writer and reading the civil cases that had been filed that day including Berg’s.  I encourage any reader here to follow his blog and note Berg’s recent reaction to the denial.  I look forward to his thoughts on Anderson.

Truth In our Time and numerous bloggers are convinced that,  “Courts throughout the USA aided and abetted the usurpation of the Presidency by refusing to hear cases challenging the citizenship of Barack Obama, now, major media is doing the same thing.”  Citing network news refusal to broadcast a commercial questioning his citizenship- the video can be viewed at the site  http://www.truthinourtime.com/2009/01/obama-citizenship-commerical.html.

Does Obama have divided loyalties?  I doubt it.  Really, the minute Obama would act to place Kenya or Indonesia above the best interests of the USA, the wrath of the domestic and foreign media, Congress, the Senate and even Nancy Pelosi would jump to attention and outrage.  Wouldn’t they? 

Is Obama factually eligible?  I don’t know.  http://www.obamaconspiracy.org/2009/01/natural-born-citizenship-for-dummies/ offers a pretty good glance at the issues but still no solution.  Perhaps the entire language of what makes one an American is extinct and moot.  A large reference to citizenship cases and notations can be found at http://tesibria.typepad.com/whats_your_evidence/the-natural-born-citizenship-clause-updated.html.

Whatever the evidence may bear in the future, on January 20, 2009, Barack Hussein Obama is most likely going to place his hand on former President Lincoln’s Bible and swear to the duty of allegiance to the United States of America.   This bond will be administered by Chief Justice  Roberts who will carry out his ceremonial duty of swearing in the next President of the United States.  If Roberts was to consider the possibility that he is swearing in a man who doesn’t  meet fundamental eligibility requirements, I imagine he would be removed unceremoniously and rapidly from the bench.  Or perhaps made a hero to those who seek the legal means to force Obama’s citizenship discloure.  Maybe the failure to deny Anderson will be enough for pause.  Berg, Donofrio and others have certainly made their cases before the justices and while not hearing the cases formally, must be aware of Obama’s current question of ineligibility for the office he is about to be sworn into.

The Supremes have once again spoken in saying nothing,  and by leaving the Anderson Amicus hanging have further blurred the waters.   

Obama, by delivering his official birth records to support his compliance with the Constitution and his professed transparency in government would alleviate future burdens on The Court and her people.  I don’t think we can hold our breath that long.  Instead, we’ll watch a new chapter of American history unfold with a democrat, black man leading our destiny either for the next four or eight years, unless a court forces him to prove his citizenship and it turns out he is ineligible.  I pray for a sufficient bond of union between Obama and America to allow him to make worthwhile choices in keeping America the land of the free and home of the brave. 

God Bless America.

Read Full Post »

The following is a funny and supposedly true story occurring in a Government class at Santa Fe High School.
  
In one civics class, the young adults were discussing the qualifications to be president of the United States. It was pretty simple. 
  
The candidate must be a natural born citizen and at least 35 years of  age.
  
However, one girl in the class immediately started in on how unfair was the requirement to be a natural born citizen. In short, her opinion was this requirement prevented many capable individuals from becoming president.
  
The class was just taking it in and letting her rant, but everyone’s jaw hit the floor when she wrapped up her argument by stating…
  
“What makes a natural born citizen any more qualified to lead this country than one born by C-section?”
  
They walk among us and they vote.

Read Full Post »

Older Posts »