09 NOVEMBER 2008: Supreme Court Of The United States (SCOTUS) Supreme Court Justice David Souter has agreed that a review of the federal lawsuit filed by attorney Phil Berg against Barack Hussein Obama II, et al., which was subsequently dismissed for lack of standing is warranted. SCOTUS Docket No. 08-570.. Berg’s petition for an injunction to stay the November 4th election was denied, but the Clerk also required the defendants to respond to the Writ of Certiorari, which I believe, requires the concurrence of four justices, by December 1, 2008.
The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that people like me and the others who want to know the origins of Barack Obama’s citizenship are not stupid, and the Court it appears to want to see Obama’s birth certificate too. There is nothing in the main stream media about Berg vs Obama or Martin vs Hawaii and until it is, we have remained on the fringe until being vindicated, at least a little bit. It seems when talking about Obama’s citizenship that people don’t know a thing, they believe it is a lie or they are following the pursuits of justice to determine his eligibility. For millions of voters, any citizenship questions they may have had were laid to rest long ago but to others, questions still remain and poignantly is, why President Elect Obama will not just show us his vaulted birth certificate?
Groups like fact check have show us what is called a ‘re-issued’ certificate, often called by the states a certificate of live birth or a COLB. A COLB normally passes for a birth certificate and is just as good unless questions arise. A comparison between the two documents can be found here. http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_R-l1iejogZw/SQLJZbuSVXI/AAAAAAAABKM/9B2p–yZzDw/s1600-h/Obama+COLB.jpg
Berg’s web site headlines “U. S. SUPREME COURT AWAITS RESPONSE TO BERG’S WRIT OF CERTIORARI FROM OBAMA, DNC and Co-DEFENDANTS For For Immediate Release: – 11/07/08 http://www.obamacrimes.com/ “I look forward to receiving defendant Obama’s response to the writ and am hopeful the U. S. Supreme Court will review Berg v. Obama. I believe Mr. Obama is not a constitutionally-qualified natural-born citizen and is ineligible to assume the office of President of the United States.”
Rule 11 as noted by the Supreme Court seems to make it clear that Justice Souter’s granting of a review on the Writ of Certiorari is not a right entitled to citizen Phil Berg, but rather is a matter of judicial discretion based upon a compelling reason. The compelling reason is the Constitutional requirement that no person except a natural born citizen shall be eligible to the office of President.
As I understand it, what this means is that on or before December 1, 2008 Barack Hussein Obama must respond to the writ of certiorari. The Berg v Obama case really is really about a whole list of 56 questions regarding Obama’s place of birth. http://quipster.wordpress.com/2008/10/11/56-questions-obama-refuses-to-answer-about-citizenship/
The Rule of 11 http://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frcp/Rule11.htm (4) the denials of factual contentions are warranted on the evidence or, if specifically so identified, are reasonably based on belief or a lack of information. I can not imagine that as a Harvard Law Graduate and as President Elect that Obama would ignore such a request from the Justices of the Supreme Court and he will be compelled to provide a vault copy his original birth certificate. In what is called a writ of mandamus to do so, they have absolutely no legal basis to refuse an order of the Supreme Court of the United States.
If Obama fails to do present his birth certificate, surely the Justices would be remiss in being defied. They will then have to decide what to do about a President-elect who refuses to prove his natural-born citizenship. Will Obama be held in contempt of court? The Court may in fact, accept his COLB and in the long run issue a dismissal, citing that the responsibility of eligibility lies in Congress. We have already seen claims by The Federal Election Committee that it is not responsible for proof of eligibility.
http://fightthesmears.com/articles/5/birthcertificate posts his COLB but even that doesn’t’t prove even that is real, only that there is no credible evidence that it is a fake. The raised seal and authoritative signature needed to validate the document cannot be seen on the scan http://web.israelinsider.com/Articles/Politics/12939.htm. His campaign has a burden of proving otherwise and his website says that, “Smears claiming Barack Obama doesn’t have a birth certificate aren’t actually about that piece of paper — they’re about manipulating people into thinking Barack is not an American citizen.” Without that that little piece of paper, my friend- the fringe will not be convoluted into believing Obama is an American Citizen and that our Constitution will remain in crisis.
While Martin has a case that is on the docket in Hawaii for November 18, 2008, there is a million dollar reward for anyone who can provide Obama’s birth certificate https://ahrcanum.wordpress.com/2008/11/09/obamas-birth-certificate-one-million-dollar-reward/ and a petition- Stop the Obama Constitutional Crisis with a reported 80,000+ signatures –the site got those signatures with out the help of ACORN!. http://www.rallycongress.com/constitutional-qualification/1244/stop-obama-constitutional-crisis/
“I can see a unanimous Court (en banc) decertifying the election if Obama refuses to produce his birth certificate,” says Raymond S. Kraft, an attorney and writer. “They cannot do otherwise without abandoning all credibility as guardians of the Constitution. Even the most liberal justices, however loathe they may to do this, still consider themselves guardians of the Constitution. The Court is very jealous of its power – even over presidents, even over presidents-elect.” Kraft is a contributor to http://www.familysecuritymatters.org/publications/id.1614/pub_detail.asp
Most citizens, including myself will support the office and pray that should Obama pass through the Electoral collage and take the Oath of Presidency that his decisions yield the best four our future. With more than a month and a half until Obama takes that Oath, we need a rational conclusion to make a rational judgment that he is in fact eligible. The final judgment could be be influenced by any chaos that could result from de-certifying and voiding the election. Found wrong or right, Berg and the American people could loose, even if he is right.
What could be so hard about that, unless you have no birth certificate to present.