Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Posts Tagged ‘Obama’s 56 Questions’

colb1

 

09 NOVEMBER 2008: Supreme Court Of The United States (SCOTUS) Supreme Court Justice David Souter has agreed that a review of the federal lawsuit filed by attorney Phil Berg against Barack Hussein Obama II, et al., which was subsequently dismissed for lack of standing is warranted. SCOTUS Docket No. 08-570..  Berg’s petition for an injunction to stay the November 4th election was denied, but the Clerk also required the defendants to respond to the Writ of Certiorari, which I believe, requires the concurrence of four justices, by December 1, 2008. 

The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that people like me and the others who want to know the origins of Barack Obama’s citizenship are not stupid, and the Court it appears to want to see Obama’s birth certificate too.  There is nothing in the main stream media about Berg vs Obama or Martin vs Hawaii and until it is, we have remained on the fringe until being vindicated, at least a little bit.  It seems when talking about Obama’s citizenship that people don’t know a thing, they believe it is a lie or they are following the pursuits of justice to determine his eligibility.  For millions of voters, any citizenship questions they may have had were laid to rest long ago but to others, questions still remain and poignantly is, why President Elect Obama will not just show us his vaulted birth certificate? 

Groups like fact check have show us what is called a ‘re-issued’ certificate, often called by the states a certificate of live birth or a COLB.  A COLB normally passes for a birth certificate and is just as good unless questions arise. A comparison between the two documents can be found here. http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_R-l1iejogZw/SQLJZbuSVXI/AAAAAAAABKM/9B2p–yZzDw/s1600-h/Obama+COLB.jpg

Berg’s web site headlines “U. S. SUPREME COURT AWAITS RESPONSE TO BERG’S WRIT OF CERTIORARI FROM OBAMA, DNC and Co-DEFENDANTS For   For Immediate Release: – 11/07/08 http://www.obamacrimes.com/  “I look forward to receiving defendant Obama’s response to the writ and am hopeful the U. S. Supreme Court will review Berg v. Obama. I believe Mr. Obama is not a constitutionally-qualified natural-born citizen and is ineligible to assume the office of President of the United States.”

Rule 11 as noted by the Supreme Court seems to make it clear that Justice Souter’s granting of a review on the Writ of Certiorari is not a right entitled to citizen Phil Berg, but rather is a matter of judicial discretion based upon a compelling reason. The compelling reason is the Constitutional requirement that no person except a natural born citizen shall be eligible to the office of President.

As I understand it, what this means is that on or before December 1, 2008 Barack Hussein Obama must respond to the writ of certiorari.  The Berg v Obama case really is really about a whole list of 56 questions regarding Obama’s place of birth. http://quipster.wordpress.com/2008/10/11/56-questions-obama-refuses-to-answer-about-citizenship/

The Rule of 11 http://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frcp/Rule11.htm (4) the denials of factual contentions are warranted on the evidence or, if specifically so identified, are reasonably based on belief or a lack of information.  I can not imagine that as a Harvard Law Graduate and as President Elect that Obama would ignore such a request from the Justices of the Supreme Court and he will be compelled to provide a vault copy his original birth certificate.  In what is called a writ of mandamus to do so, they have absolutely no legal basis to refuse an order of the Supreme Court of the United States.

If Obama fails to do present his birth certificate, surely the Justices would be remiss in being defied.  They will then have to decide what to do about a President-elect who refuses to prove his natural-born citizenship.  Will Obama be held in contempt of court?  The Court may in fact, accept his COLB and in the long run issue a dismissal, citing that the responsibility of eligibility lies in Congress. We have already seen claims by The Federal Election Committee that it is not responsible for proof of eligibility

http://fightthesmears.com/articles/5/birthcertificate  posts his COLB but even that doesn’t’t prove even that is real, only that there is no credible evidence that it is a fake.  The raised seal and authoritative signature needed to validate the document cannot be seen on the scan http://web.israelinsider.com/Articles/Politics/12939.htm.  His campaign has a burden of proving otherwise and his website says that, “Smears claiming Barack Obama doesn’t have a birth certificate aren’t actually about that piece of paper — they’re about manipulating people into thinking Barack is not an American citizen.” Without that that little piece of paper, my friend- the fringe will not be convoluted into believing Obama is an American Citizen and that our Constitution will remain in crisis.  

While Martin has a case that is on the docket in Hawaii for November 18, 2008, there is a million dollar reward for anyone who can provide Obama’s birth certificate https://ahrcanum.wordpress.com/2008/11/09/obamas-birth-certificate-one-million-dollar-reward/ and a petition- Stop the Obama Constitutional Crisis with a reported 80,000+ signatures –the site got those signatures with out the help of ACORN!.   http://www.rallycongress.com/constitutional-qualification/1244/stop-obama-constitutional-crisis/ 

“I can see a unanimous Court (en banc) decertifying the election if Obama refuses to produce his birth certificate,” says Raymond S. Kraft, an attorney and writer. “They cannot do otherwise without abandoning all credibility as guardians of the Constitution. Even the most liberal justices, however loathe they may to do this, still consider themselves guardians of the Constitution. The Court is very jealous of its power – even over presidents, even over presidents-elect.”  Kraft is a contributor to http://www.familysecuritymatters.org/publications/id.1614/pub_detail.asp

Most citizens, including myself will support the office and pray that should Obama pass through the Electoral collage and take the Oath of Presidency that his decisions yield the best four our future.  With more than a month and a half until Obama takes that Oath, we need a rational conclusion to make a rational judgment that he is in fact eligible.  The final judgment could be be influenced by any chaos that could result from de-certifying and voiding the election.  Found wrong or right, Berg and the American people could loose, even if he is right. 

What could be so hard about that, unless you have no birth certificate to present.

Advertisements

Read Full Post »

Less than 72 hours to go, and McCain’s campaign is pushing an “anti-Obama” message and a Pro-McCain message second. Rumors continue to circle like sharks smelling blood around Obama, his family and his associates.  As usual the MSM- Main Stream Media has pretty much ignored Obama shortcomings and instead focused on polls surmising an Obama Victory.  McCain managed a one point lead over Obama last week but then Zogby decided to average out the polling for three days in a row, and ta-da, Obama is back in the Main Stream News leading by a huge margin .  “Remember, as I said yesterday, one day does not make a trend. This is a three-day rolling average and no changes have been tectonic.”  said pollster, John Zogby http://www.zogby.com/news/ReadNews.dbm?ID=1627 

Obama’s anti-rumor plan, it seems has worked. Rather than continuing to answer questions directly about lingering questions like: his citizenship, former relationships with terrorists like William Ayers, his ministry with Reverend Jeremiah Wright, the missing L.A. Times tape, or most recently his Aunt who is not only an illegal alien but illegally donated to his campaign, Obama instead has relied on his website fightthesmears.com to alleviate any lingering questions. http://www.fightthesmears.com/  Apparently the Obama campaign is too busy to provide a statement at this time regarding his Aunt, the L.A. Times Tape, or any of the pending litigation against him like Berg vs Obama on his site.   

Obama was quoted in a mid-June Times article saying, “”We have seen this before. There is dirt and lies that are circulated in e-mails, and they pump them out long enough until finally you, a mainstream reporter, asks me about it,” Obama said, bristling. “That gives legs to the story. If somebody has evidence that myself or Michelle or anybody has said something inappropriate, let them do it.”  America has asked repeatedly for clarifications, yet Obama fails to answer directly. 

In the matter of Obama’s aunt, Obama couldn’t even manage to make a comment himself instead relying on spokesman Ben LaBolt, saying that the campaign was returning $265 dollars donated by the aunt to her nephew’s campaign. 

“It may be that Obama’s enduring argument – that America faces challenges too tough to be simply about so-called “domestic terrorists” and whether he has been lying about his birth certificate – will prevail in the end. “http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/2008/11/02/why-do-democrats-keep-losing/

While McCain has often wavered in his message, Obama’s from day one has said “What you won’t hear from this campaign or this party is the kind of politics that uses religion as a wedge, and patriotism as a bludgeon — that sees our opponents not as competitors to challenge, but enemies to demonize.”- Barack Obama, June 3, 2008.  I find it disheartening to know that I and other citizens who merely question his policies are demonizing him and unpatriotic.

McCain too has had his fair share of citizenship eligibility questions lobbed at him.  In April of this year, a number of Obama’s congressional supporters – including Gov. Claire McCaskill (D-MOi), Senator Patrick Leahy (D-VT), Sen. Barack Obama (D-IL) Sen. Tom Coburn (R-OK), Sen. Hillary Clinton (D-NY), and Sen. James Webb (D-VA) –proposed  and passed a Resolution (S.Res.511) entitled: Recognizing that John Sidney McCain, III, is a natural born citizen. http://www.tulsatoday.com/newsdesk/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=1775&Itemid=2 This was the Resolution:
·  Whereas the Constitution of the United States requires that, to be eligible for the Office of the President, a person must be a `natural born Citizen’ of the United States;
·  Whereas the term `natural born Citizen’, as that term appears in Article II, Section 1, is not defined in the Constitution of the United States;
·  Whereas there is no evidence of the intention of the Framers or any Congress to limit the constitutional rights of children born to Americans serving in the military nor to prevent those children from serving as their country’s President;
·  Whereas such limitations would be inconsistent with the purpose and intent of the `natural born Citizen’ clause of the Constitution of the United States, as evidenced by the First Congress’s own statute defining the term `natural born Citizen’;
·  Whereas the well-being of all citizens of the United States is preserved and enhanced by the men and women who are assigned to serve our country outside of our national borders;
·  Whereas previous presidential candidates were born outside of the United States of America and were understood to be eligible to be President; and
·  Whereas John Sidney McCain, III, was born to American citizens on an American military base in the Panama Canal Zone in 1936: Now, therefore, be it
·  Resolved, That John Sidney McCain, III, is a `natural born Citizen’ under Article II, Section 1, of the Constitution of the United Calendar No. 715110th CONGRESS2d SessionS. RES. 511RESOLUTIONRecognizing that John Sidney McCain, III, is a natural born citizen. April 24, 2008. Reported without amendment Statess

Whereas, since it was entered into Congressional Records as fact, McCain did not have to provide a  birth certificate and neither does Obama, clearly circumventing the Constitution.  No such Congressional record exsisits to recognize that Baraq Obama is natural born.  According to Raymond S. Kraft, an attorney and writer: “The president, The Supreme Court justices, and all members of Congress, have taken an oath to defend and protect the Constitution and have an affirmative duty to protect the Constitution by doing whatever is necessary to insure that presidential (and congressional) candidates meet the Constitutional requirements for the offices they seek. It is a mandatory duty, and failure to do so violate their oaths of office. If they don’t follow this oath in Obama’s case, it will be the biggest swindle in American history, allowing Obama and the DNC to have concealed his true identity and lack of citizenship, thereby conning Democrats out of hundreds of millions of dollars of campaign contributions. If justice is served, dozens of `leading’ Democrats should go to prison for fraud.” from Tulsa Today.

http://www.youdontsay.org/Thoughts.htm Raymond Kraft on his own site, today wrote, ” Once again we have a candidate with wondrous and multitudinous promises. Just vote for him and joy and happiness will forever be ours. All of our wishes will be granted. All of our needs will be met. All of our fears will be banished. Because a vote for the anointed one is a vote for change: glorious, blessed, momentous change! Historians will remind us that Fidel Castro promised change as well. Karl Marx promised change. Adolf Hitler promised change. People bought into those fantasies, not thinking that a promise for change is a blank check for good or bad, anything but the status quo. Historians should also remind us that in almost all such instances, promises of change did not serve the people well.”

I Promise to vote for John McCain.

Read Full Post »

The audacity of Obama’s eligibility!  Is Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama eligible for President, or not?  Critics and adversaries have spent a lot of time and money raising doubt and spreading rumors that Obama is not a citizen.  In Obama’s refusal to provide proof and only file motions to dismiss, he is beginning to alert the questioning, rational, voting public into making a rational conclusion and judgment that perhaps he has something to hide after all.

The case of Berg vs Obama was seeking to clarify in Federal Court, Obama’s citizenship status.  Berg vs Omama was filed the case over two months ago, taking more than 60 days to reach an opinion of the court. The motion may be read in its entirety here http://obamacrimes.com/attachments/041_Obama,%20Plaintiff/’s%20Motion%20for%20Summary%20Judgment%20against%20Obama%20and%20the%20DNC.pdfAccordiing to the Philadelphia Daily News, Saturday Morning on-line edition- http://www.philly.com/dailynews/local/20081025_Judge_rejects_Montco_lawyer_s_bid_to_have_Obama_removed_from_ballot.html Judge 

Judge Surrick has dismissed the lawsuit.  In a 34 page memorandum and opinion, the judge said “Berg’s allegations of harm were “too vague and attenuated to confer standing on him or any other voters.”  In pursuing the claims that Obama was not a natural-born citizen they were, ” frivolous and not worth of discussion.” In addition, that Berg’s arguments to the contrary, “ventured into the unreasonable.”

http://www.paed.uscourts.gov/ is the web site for the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania.  Any rulings can be found under recently filed opinions for free, however it does not appear here yet. The PACER Service Center is the Federal Judiciaries centralized registration, billing, and technical support center for electronic access to U.S. District, Bankruptcy, and Appellate court records http://pacer.psc.uscourts.gov/uspci.html You must register and pay 8 cents per page to access these records. 

How is unreasonable to seek out through the court, the determination of qualifications to achieve The Office of President of The United States of America?  Berg listed a total of 56 questions that were by some accounts, a stretch into an abyss of technicalities and accusations, but the simple request of requiring Obama to present a certified birth certificate and not a certificate of live birth has been denied not only to Berg but to all Americans seeking truth and justice in a marred political and judicial system. Berg only last week sought an ORDER ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT     http://obamacrimes.com/attachments/041_Obama,%20Plaintiff/’s%20Motion%20for%20Summary%20Judgment%20against%20Obama%20and%20the%20DNC.pdf.  Berg’s attempted to require the court to cite Rule 56 of civil proceedings {From the Legal Information Institute http://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frcp/Rule56.htm } in that since Obama failed to deny the accuracy, it is” (2) Opposing Party’s Obligation to Respond. When a motion for summary judgment is properly made and supported, an opposing party may not rely merely on allegations or denials in its own pleading; rather, its response must — by affidavits or as otherwise provided in this rule — set out specific facts showing a genuine issue for trial. If the opposing party does not so respond, summary judgment should, if appropriate, be entered against that party.”  Berg was basically saying that since Obama did not respond to this motion, Obama does not meet eligibility as President and that all of the Admissions directed to Obama and the DNC are [sic-should have been] deemed “ADMITTED.”  Therefore, Obama must immediately withdraw his candidacy for President.   https://ahrcanum.wordpress.com/2008/10/24/citizenship-lawsuits-linger-for-obama/  

 

 

Obama’s certificate of birth, while not a birth certificate can be found at http://fightthesmears.com/articles/5/birthcertificate  That doesn’t prove it is real. Only that there is no credible evidence that it’s fake.  His campaign has a burden of proving otherwise, and they have failed to do so and will not be required to instead filing motions for dismissal rather than providing proof.

Both Nominees and selected Vice Presidents, all four of them- Obama, Biden, McCain and Palin should be asked to provide a copy of their original birth certificates- not just live birth.  http://gretawire.foxnews.com/2008/10/24/ok-the-internet-rumors-about-the-birth-certificate-lets-end-the-rumors-and-the-viral-nature-of-them/ Greta thinks so too.  

The matter of Obama’s citizenship records will not cease with the ruling from the the Presiding Judge- The Honorable R. Barclay Surrick, United States District Judge, United States Courthouse, 601 Market Street, Room 8614, Philadelphia, PA 19106,  Deputy clerk: Michael Finney  (267) 299-7639 Secretary: Donna Donahue (267) 299-7631. Today is Saturday, and it seems rather convenient that the court has issued its ruling over the weekend whereby,  no comments can be made to the press or enter the entire findings into court records.  

I’d bet my piece of sweet potato pie that Berg will file an appeal.  There is a  draft template that after a few revisions anyone in California and The United States will be able to use to sue Barack H. Obama for his certificate of live birth.”   Just fill in your name and file it –  http://mitchell-langbert.blogspot.com/2008/10/draft-cal-template-to-sue-for-bocolb.html

Read Full Post »

All this regarding Berg v Obama, filed in Federal Court two months ago and unnoticed by any Main Stream Media is what could end up having Obama Removed from the Ballot.  Obama’s attorneys and the DNC failed to respond for a motion that could cost Obama the Presidency.  Rule 56 or 56c  —   Rule 56 is defined:

From the Legal Information Institute http://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frcp/Rule56.htm 

(2) Opposing Party’s Obligation to Respond.

When a motion for summary judgment is properly made and supported, an opposing party may not rely merely on allegations or denials in its own pleading; rather, its response must — by affidavits or as otherwise provided in this rule — set out specific facts showing a genuine issue for trial. If the opposing party does not so respond, summary judgment should, if appropriate, be entered against that party.

And the very last line, in section g-   “An offending party or attorney may also be held in contempt.”  The courts could in fact hold the Obama and the DNC in Contempt.

Obama is a Harvard lawyer and should be very familiar with 56c.

Read Full Post »

Berg filed Requests for Admissions on September 15, 2008.  A response by way of answer or objection had to be served within thirty [30] days of the court filing date according to NY law under a request for Admissions “Admitted,” Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 56(c).

No response to the Requests for Admissions was served by way of response or objection. Thus, all of the Admissions directed to Obama and the DNC are deemed “ADMITTED.” Therefore, Obama must immediately withdraw his candidacy for President.   

https://ahrcanum.wordpress.com/2008/10/24/citizenship-lawsuits-linger-for-obama/ 

Here is the pdf of Berg’s ORDER ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT   

  http://obamacrimes.com/attachments/041_Obama,%20Plaintiff/’s%20Motion%20for%20Summary%20Judgment%20against%20Obama%20and%20the%20DNC.pdf

 

 

 Of course, the judge has the final ruling.  Here comes the judge, here comes the judge,…let’s hope it is before Election Day. 

 

OBAMA – Admitted:

1. I was born in Kenya.
2. I am a Kenya “natural born” citizen.
3. My foreign birth was registered in the State of Hawaii.
4. My father, Barrack Hussein Obama, Sr. admitted Paternity of me.
5. My mother gave birth to me in Mombosa, Kenya.
6. My mother’s maiden name is Stanley Ann Dunham a/k/a Ann Dunham.
7. The COLB [Certification of Live Birth] posted on the website “Fightthesmears.com” is a forgery.
8. I was adopted by a Foreign Citizen.
9. I was adopted by Lolo Soetoro, M.A. a citizen of Indonesia.
10. I was not born in Hawaii.
11. I was not born at the Queens Medical Center in Hawaii.
12. I was not born at Kapi’olani Medical Center for Women and Children in Hawaii.
13. I was not born in a Hospital in Hawaii.
14. I am a citizen of Indonesia.
15. I never took the “Oath of Allegiance” to regain my U.S. Citizenship status.
16. I am not a “natural born” United States citizen.
17. My date of birth is August 4, 1961.
18. I traveled to Pakistan in 1981 with my Pakistan friends.
19. In 1981, I went to Indonesia on my way to Pakistan.
20. Pakistan was a no travel zone in 1981 for American Citizens.
21. In 1981, Pakistan was not allowing American Citizens to enter their country.
22. I traveled on my Indonesian Passport to Pakistan.
23. I renewed my Indonesian Passport on my way to Pakistan.
24. My senior campaign staff is aware I am not a “natural born” United States Citizen.
25. I am proud of my Kenya Heritage.
26. My relatives have requested changes to the portion of my birth certificate that identifies my first name.
27. My relatives have requested changes to the portion of my birth certificate that identifies my last name.
28. My relatives have requested changes to the portion of my birth certificate that identifies my place of birth.
29. I requested changes to the portion of my birth certificate that identifies my first name.
30. I requested changes to the portion of my birth certificate that identifies my last name.
31. I requested changes to the portion of my birth certificate that identifies my place of birth.
32. The document identified as my Indonesian School record from Fransiskus Assisi School in Jakarta, Indonesia is genuine.
33. I went to a Judge in Hawaii to have my name changed.
34. I went to a Senator and/or Congressman or other public official in Hawaii to have my name changed.
35. I had a passport issued to me from the Government of Indonesia.
36. The United States Constitution does not allow for a Person to hold the office of President of the United States unless that person is a “natural born” United States citizen.
37. I am ineligible pursuant to the United States Constitution to serve as President and/or Vice President of the United States.
38. I never renounced my citizenship as it relates to my citizenship to the country of Indonesia.
39. I never renounced my citizenship as it relates to my citizenship to the country of Kenya.
40. I am an Attorney who specializes in Constitutional Law.
41. Kenya was a part of the British Colonies at the time of my birth.
42. Kenya did not become its own Republic until 1963.
43. I am not a “Naturalized” United States Citizen.
44. I obtained $200 Million dollars in campaign funds by fraudulent means.
45. I cannot produce a “vault” (original) long version of a birth certificate showing my birth in Hawaii.
46. My “vault” (original) long version birth certificate shows my birth in Kenya.
47. The only times I was to a Hospital in Hawaii was for check-ups or medical treatments for illnesses.
48. Queens Medical Center in Honolulu, Hawaii does not have any record of my mother, Stanley Ann Dunham (Obama) giving birth to me.
49. Kapi’olani Medical Center for Women and Children in Honolulu, Hawaii does not have any record of my mother, Stanley Ann Dunham (Obama) giving birth to me.
50. I was born in the Coast Province Hospital in Mombasa, Kenya.
51. I represented on my State Bar application in Illinois that I never used any other name other than Barack Hussein Obama.
52. I went by the name Barry Soetoro in Indonesia.
53. My Indonesian school records are under the name of Barry Soetoro.
54. I took an Oath to uphold the United States Constitution when admitted to the State Bar of Illinois to practice Law.
55. I took an Oath to uphold the United States Constitution when I was Sworn into my United States Senate Office.
56. I hold dual citizenship with at least one other Country besides the United States of America.

Answers to the 56 questions posed in the Federal Compaint Berg v Obama and cross posted from http://seditiousblasphemer.wordpress.com/2008/10/22/update-obama-dnc-admit-all-allegations-in-berg-v-obama/#comment-47

Read Full Post »

Phil Berg on The Michael Savage Show talking about Obama’s questionable citizenship.  Berg is awaiting an opinion of the court and of the impression that since That One’s attorneys missed a deadline to dispute citizenshpip facts as required, Obama is not eligible as President.

http://michaelsavage.wnd.com/?pageId=2256  listen in, only few minutes long but it takes a minute to load-too many hits!  Also, forward to some friends who have no idea what is going on. 

The conversation also brings up why Obama announced he was going to Hawaii days in advance of leaving to go see his [white] grandmother if she was so sick and why not the rest of the family?

It should be no little secret that he can pick up his birth certificate while he is in Hawaii.

Read Full Post »

We all know propaganda – and how some of it gets out of hand.  Propaganda and lawsuits aside, there are some facts that can be stretched to wrap around the truth that embrace questions Obama should answer to regarding his birth certificate, citizenship and eligibility to run for candidate for President of The United States of America. 

In Hawaii, Andy Martin’s filed a legal case where he asked to see a copy of Obama’s birth certificate citing that Obama has refused to provide a certified copy of his birth certificate and not a certificate of birth which is posted on a website.  The certificate of birth has has undergone scrutiny of being a forgery.  http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/atlas_shrugs/2008/07/atlas-exclusive.html   The Martin case has been thrown out and the Supreme Court in Hawaii moving at hyper drive speed, the court took less than a week to issue its ruling that Martin can not have a copy of Obama’s birth certificate and reiterated Hawaii’s sealed documents and public records laws.  

Mr. Martin is now theorizing that Frank Marshall Davis is Obama’s actual birth father.  Now there’s a twist!  Obama’s growing-up mentor and surrogate father Frank Marshall Davis is not someone Obama denies having a relationship with.  Obama refers to him as Frank in his own book, but he doesn’t acknowledge that Davis was a communist CPUSA, and that socialism provided the only workable alternative to capitalism, Obama tries to say that he was a civil rights activist.  I did not find that the FBI files have been released on Davis who has since passed away.  An FBI excerpt from http://www.usasurvival.org/docs/Declassified_docs.pdf outlines Obama associate, Bill Ayers and the Weather Underground to the CPUSA and the organizations hideous behavior.  Why hasn’t the FBI released Davis’ investigative documents? 

Obama’s own book does not makes mention of Davis’s Sex Rebel book (written under the recognized pseudonym Bob Greene) and his interest in pornography which is where Martin bases his theory that Obama’s dad is Frank Marshall Davis.  http://righttruth.typepad.com/right_truth/2008/08/obamas-peverted-communist-friend-frank.html  asserts that “The book, which closely tracks Mr. Davis’s life in Chicago and Hawaii and the fact that his first wife was black and his second white, describes in lurid detail a series of shockingly sordid sexual encounters, often involving group sex. One chapter concerns the seduction by Mr. Davis and his first wife of a 13-year-old girl called Anne. Mr. Davis wrote that it was the girl who had suggested he had sex with her.”  Obama’s birth mother is names Ann and viola – we see where Martin makes a huge leap to make the assertion that Davis is his dad.  Is there any chance Frank Marshall Davis is Obama’s Dad?
 
Propaganda propels information and disinformation.  In the case of Berg vs Obama and The Democratic National Party, he is not only seeking a copy of Obama’s birth certificate but an answer to 56 questions regarding his citizenship.  We are still awaiting a final ruling in Berg vs Obama, two months after its initial filing.  http://www.obamacrimes.com/

Berg stated that he filed Requests for Admissions on September 15, 2008 with a response by way of answer or objection had to be served within thirty [30] days. No response to the Requests for Admissions was served by way of response or objection. Thus, all of the Admissions directed to Obama and the DNC are deemed “ADMITTED.” Therefore, Obama must immediately withdraw his candidacy for President.”

Brian Smith, who has followed the story [sic Berg v Obama] from its legal standpoint. First and foremost, Mr. Smith makes it clear that he is a registered Independent. On his blog, he has said that Berg’s filings on October 22nd for a Motion of Summary Judgment is “huge” from a legal perspective because, as stated in the motion, the Obama camp failed to comply with the discovery requests or appropriately object, and thus Berg’s allegations are essentially deemed as true as a matter of law. http://james4america.wordpress.com/2008/10/23/perception-is-reality-in-politics/

 Berg also filed emergency motions to the courts, October 22, 2008  and that the Court should issue a summary judgment as follows:

  • That Barack Hussein Obama a/k/a Barry Hussein Obama a/k/a Barack Dunham a/k/a Barry Dunham a/k/a Barack Soetoro a/k/a Barry Soetoro is not a “natural born” or “naturalized” United States citizen.
  • That he is ineligible to run for and/or serve as President of the United States.
  • That the Democratic National Committee be enjoined from naming Barack Hussein Obama, et al as the Democratic Presidential Candidate on the ballot.
  • That the Democratic National Committee and Barack Hussein Obama, et al are enjoined from any further campaigning on behalf of Barack Hussein Obama, et al for Office of the Presidency.
  • That Barack Hussein Obama’s, et al name be removed from any and all ballots for the Office of the President of the United States.

Citing a “Failure to Answer or Object to Requests for Admissions within thirty [30] days deems the Request for Admissions “Admitted,” Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 56(c) makes this blogger suspect that Berg is absolutely correct.   In an overview of the Plaintiff’s Complaint Berg writes, ” Instead of satisfying Plaintiff and the general public’s concerns regarding Obama’s citizenship status, or lack thereof, Obama and the DNC have chosen to litigate the matters in lieu of providing what should be simple proof. Defendants have filed two [2] Motions to Dismiss and a Motion for a Protective Order instead of simply solving the matters and providing the proof verifying Obama’s citizenship status. The fact Obama is a U.S. Senator for Illinois and a Presidential candidate, he is open for public scrutiny and Plaintiff as well as all American Citizens have a right to question and receive proof of citizenship”

Propaganda may finally lead to the truth about Obama’s citizenship status. 

The motion may be read in its entirety here http://obamacrimes.com/attachments/041_Obama,%20Plaintiff/’s%20Motion%20for%20Summary%20Judgment%20against%20Obama%20and%20the%20DNC.pdf

Obama is Hawaii this week visiting his sick grandmother and while America has compassion and condolences, America needs to know who you are and where you are a citizen of. NOW.

Read Full Post »

Older Posts »