Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Posts Tagged ‘Philip Berg’

“Glenn Beck insults Americans, military, US Constitution, Citizen Wells red phone challenge!

Unlike Lou Dobbs, who on CNN of all places, asked the basic journalistic question, why doesn’t Obama present a legitimate birth certificate, Glenn Beck, on his radio  and Fox TV show has insulted millions of concerned Americans. Many of these Americans are current and retired military and quite a few high ranking officers. Beck often talks out of one side of his mouth about upholding the US Constitution, while at the same time insulting Americans exercising their First Amendment rights.

Three concerned Americans, Philip J Berg, a lifelong Democrat, former ambassador Dr. Alan Keyes and Charles F Kerchner, USNR Commander, all requested Obama’s college records using legal channels and were opposed by Obama attorneys.

Glenn Beck, if you have any questions or corrections to make about this video, you can call
me on the dedicated phone (Mickey Mouse red phone holding the cell phone).”

http://citizenwells.wordpress.com begins his most recent article this way:Why has Obama employed a legion of private and government attorneys to avoid presenting a legitimate birth certificate and college records?…Citizen Wells and millions of concerned Americans

Glenn Beck, et al, the above question is simple to answer, simple enough for a fifth grader. Lou Dobbs, while still at CNN, asked another simple question. Why doesn’t Obama just provide a legitimate birth certificate. However, Glenn Beck, the eligibility issues surrounding Obama appear to be too complex (or controversial) for you. You know, messy stuff like natural born citizen and the US Constitution. So I have decided to just focus on something real simple for you, something you can get your head around. Obama’s college records. That’s not too complex or controversial is it?

Glenn, perhaps even you at one time or another had to prove you attended a school.

Glenn Beck, you inspired me with the red phone you set up to receive calls from the Obama Administration. So I have dedicated a phone to receive calls from you. If anything I write or put in a video is incorrect, please call me anytime and let me know. The follow video, let’s call it a trailer for upcoming shows, presents some information regarding efforts to obtain Obama’s college records. I will be curious to know if you consider the three men referred to in the video as right wing idiots.  One of them is a retired military officer. You have insulted plenty of them in the past, so why not. Heck, you will probably call me an idiot. However, I must warn you, I fight back. I will not back down.

We sure as hell never expected Citizen Wells to ever back down!  GO WELLS.

Here’s a few of our older articles on Obama citizenship and records https://ahrcanum.wordpress.com/category/citizenship/ and one of our personal favorites https://ahrcanum.wordpress.com/2009/03/27/obamas-illuminati-ponzi-of-the-dollar/ 

  flag tounge 

Open wide, say ahhh and check out more posts from Ahrcanum! 

Our Swine Flu Report that began in April is at https://ahrcanum.wordpress.com/swine-flu-report     

Shaking, rattling and rolling into the conspiracy, truth and science of EARTHQUAKES, HAARP, EISCAT, Tesla, etc., with more posts at https://ahrcanum.wordpress.com/earthquakes-haarp/  

Help spread the word.  SUBSCRIBE  NOW and Follow us on Twitter (by clicking in the side margin)  so you can get the latest updates as soon as they’re posted. Make sure to retweet, so all your friends get the heads up too. 

Read Full Post »

President Obama will release his birth certificate while on his Hawaiian vacation!  You believe that, I’ve got some carbon credits to sell, cheap! 

Interrupting his vacation in Hawaii for the second time, instead he spoke about the Christmas attempted airplane bombing.

“Had this critical information been shared, it could have been compiled with other intelligence, and a fuller, clearer picture of the suspect would have emerged,” Obama said in a brief statement to the media. “The warning signs would have triggered red flags, and the suspect would have never been allowed to board that plane for America.”  Officials said Obama chose to make a second statement in as many days because a morning briefing offered him new information in the government’s possession about the suspect’s activities and thinking, along with al-Qaida’s plans.http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9CTB5BG0&show_article=1

While in Hawaii, President Obama ought to put an end to all the birther arguments that he is not a usurper, but we all know that is not going to happen.  As he mentions in his press statement- “intelligence for a clear picture,” the red flags still exist regarding his citizenship.  Numerous court cases have challenged President Obama’s natural born citizenship under Article II, Section 1 of the United States Constitution that says that the president be a “natural born citizen.”  Only he can make them go away.

Following the continuing legal onslaught is The Right Side of Life, which offers a current listing of pending lawsuits.  http://www.therightsideoflife.com/current-lawsuit-listing/ 

Hawaii officials haven’t helped matters, issuing statements claiming that they have President Obama’s authenticated copy- alas, not an original as they made the switch to electronic documents years ago.  So what kind of document has fact check been presenting all this time?  A forgery? What are they claiming to have seen? http://www.factcheck.org/elections-2008/born_in_the_usa.html

Berg, Wells, Donofrio, Martin and others have sought to use the courts in a reasonable, mostly respectful  manner to require President Obama to produce his birth certificate.  Obama continues to waste the courts time and money to keep it sealed.  What is there to hide.  The Truth?

Self  proclaiming the, “World’s Leading Obama Eligibility Challenge Web Site,” is Orly Taitz, esq.,  http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=7074 who has apparently gone off the deep end asking:

What is the real intention of this Kenyan, Indonesian communist usurper? Is it to provide security for us or to destroy our security? Judge for yourself. Seeing targeted destruction of our economy, our security, dissipation of American jobs, massive corruption in the Government, Congress Department of Justice and Judiciary, it might be time to start rallies and protests using our second amendment right to bare arms and organise in militias.” http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=7074

Rallies and Protests with guns? Organize militias?  The Tea Party mentality of today does not advocate violence against anyone, only peaceable change mainly by voting out officials.  Maybe she posted drunk on eggnog? Whatever credibility she had, is gone.

With props to http://citizenwells.wordpress.com , directing us to http://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/12/what-is-putative-president-obamas.html  Mario Apuzzo, Esq., offers 30 legitimate fed flags of concern regarding his citizenship, and closes with the following statement:

Hence, if Obama was not born in the United States, under the Fourteenth Amendment he is neither a United States citizen by birth on United States soil nor one by naturalization. (There is no existing evidence that Obama was ever naturalized.) Nor would he qualify to be a United States citizen by any act of Congress by being born abroad to a United States citizen parent. If this scenario were proven to be true (being neither a born nor a naturalized citizen), it can be reasonably argued that Obama is an undocumented alien. Obama has refused to release his identity documents to the public which causes such theories to exist. It is this reason which shows the importance of the American people being able to access Obama’s records (birth certificate, travel, education, and employment records) to intelligently learn his exact citizenship status. Surely, the United States cannot have a possible undocumented alien be its President. People must keep pressing Obama that he releases his personal documents so that they may at least learn that the President is at least a “citizen of the United States” which again still does not make him an Article II “natural born Citizen.”

Read the whole Washington Post investigative journalism thingie, on the background of the bomber and you too, can join the millions of others who now know more about the college years of the Undi-bomber than they do those of the President of the United States. via http://www.smalldeadanimals.com/archives/013005.html 

The entire issue of natural born citizen is quite the legal conundrum.  Among other sites, the folks at http://therightwing.net/index.php/2008/12/09/the-natural-born-citizen-case-explained/  have an easy explanation of the natural born citizen clause and its merit to our laws for Presidency. 

Imagine the merits or detriments that could occur if President Obama himself, personally went to collect his birth certificate with the news media in tow.  That would make a wonderful way to begin the New Year, with truth, honesty, integrity and transparency. 

Happy New Year anyway.

flag tounge

Open wide, say ahhh and subscribe for free in the top right margin. Or follow our Swine Flu Report here.

https://ahrcanum.wordpress.com/swine-flu-report/

Read Full Post »

Tenacious:  1 a: not easily pulled apart : cohesive<a tenacious metal> b: tending to adhere or cling especially to another substance <tenacious burs>2 a: persistent in maintaining, adhering to, or seeking something valued or desired <a tenacious advocate of civil rights> <tenacious negotiators> b: retentive <a tenacious memory>  . Webster.

Tenacious is Phil Berg.  Whatever one’s opinion of Berg, he is still at the doors of The Supreme Court looking for answers regarding President Obama’s natural born citizenship issues which remain unresolved to some, even after the inauguration.
As Obama can attest to-if at first you don’t succeed, try again in the statement of The Oath of Office, Berg keeps trying again and again at The Supreme Court to find out the truth in Obama’s genealogy that would prove or disprove his eligibility to hold the Office of Presidency.
Perhaps it is just protocol or maybe the merits of the case will be considered prior to their being a judgment made, but The Free Republic http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2177262/posts  posting from PACER shows-02/02/2009 Open Document CLERK ORDER referring the Response of Appellant to Appellee Federal Election Committee’s Motion for Summary Affirmance to the merits panel, filed. SEND TO MERITS PANEL. (CH) [emphasis from posting]

Berg’s case is still alive-barely.

http://wthrockmorton.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/joyce_anderson-amicus-final.pdf  for docket No. 08-570  Berg v Obama  

If all other actions fall through, apparently Philip Berg  plans on filing a Petition for Writ of Quo Warranto (be sure to read the linked wikipedia article)  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quo_warranto], challenging qualifications for President.

 

Props to the Right Side of Life who keeps track of all the legal filings regarding Obama’s citizenship.  http://www.therightsideoflife.com/?page_id=1518 and here http://www.therightsideoflife.com/?p=3371

Tenacious indeed, Mr. Berg.

Read Full Post »

According to the Wall Street Wire of the Wall Street Journal, “President-elect Barack Obama and Vice President-elect Joe Biden will visit the U.S. Supreme Court today after an invitation was extended by Chief Justice John Roberts. [sic 01142009]

This is the third time in modern history that a president-elect and vice-president elect have made pre-inaugural stops to the court—Bill Clinton and Al Gore visited the court on Dec. 8, 1992 and Ronald Reagan and George H.W. Bush visited the court on Nov. 19, 1980.

Obama and Biden will meet with Roberts and the associate justices in the ceremonial West Conference Room, and are expected to take a tour of the court. The event is private and closed to the press. ”  http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2009/01/14/obama-and-biden-to-meet-with-supreme-court-justices/#comment-289510

Chief Justice Roberts is scheduled to officiate the swearing in of Obama on January 20, 2008 , but lingering court cases regarding Obama’s citizenship have been shuffling around the Supreme Court.  All have been denied or denied without judgment, so far.  Still, cases are pending.  Perhaps this is a perfect opportunity, behind closed doors for the Justices to ask Obama if he is qualified under our Constitutional Law, to hold the office of President.  Maybe they will ask him but even if they do, I doubt we would ever be privileged to the answer.   

Obama said, “I was a constitutional law professor, which means unlike the current president, I actually respect the Constitution”  but then again we have to ask how does Obama propose to protect and defend a document he believes to contain a “fundamental flaw”? 

I have a pair of Hawaiian flip flops for sale if anyone is interested. 

Wheresyourevidence is a site that has been keeping up on must of the the legal challenges regarding his citizenship. The site  has been challenged by some as being run by Obama’s legal team.  http://tesibria.typepad.com/whats_your_evidence/the-natural-born-citizenship-clause-updated.html.

Read Full Post »

Obama’s eligibility appears to be a go go from The Supreme Court.  Oh no, no, no some will say.  Numerous court cases have challenged President Obama’s natural born citizenship under Article II, Section 1 of the United States Constitution that says that the president be a “natural born citizen.”  All have been met with the same outcome as today- Denied. 

Phil Berg originally filed his suit against Obama and others way back in August.  It has taken five months to get the official word from the Supremes that his petition for certiorari is denied before judgment.  It should come as no surprise that  The Court offered no explanation but note the court said, denied before judgment.  http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_R-l1iejogZw/SWtjunekRMI/AAAAAAAAB7I/QNmswBBRZcQ/s1600-h/Berg+Cert+Denial.bmp  Humph, denied should be denied, but ya never know. 

It did allow, “The Motion for Bill Anderson for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae is granted.”   (http://www.techlawjournal.com/glossary/legal/amicus.htm ) I wonder what relevant matter not already brought to the Court’s attention he could offer?  The Anderson brief in its entirety can be found here  http://wthrockmorton.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/joyce_anderson-amicus-final.pdf  and also at  http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2145354/posts  The meat and bones of the amicus is—

“The amicus is a citizen of the State of Arizona and an elector of that state for elector for President of the United States. He voted in the general election held by the State of Arizona on November 4, 2008. This Court has in fact recognized that the amicus has an interest in this type of case. See United States v. Newman, 238 U.S. 537, 547, 35 S.Ct. 881, 883, 59 L.Ed. 1446, 1450 (1915); and the same holds true for the petitioner. Ibid. Your amicus submits that it will not be possible for this Court to dispose of this case properly without considering the following points which either have not been brought to the attention of this Court by the parties or which have not been adequately discussed: 1.) This Court is not facing a question of the constitutional aspects of standing, but a question pertaining to the prudential considerations only; and, 2.) The lack of an adequate remedy following the inauguration of Barack Obama, 2 and the potential civil and military crises which could arise therefrom, crises that could not be readily addressed by the ordinary processes of the law, must be considered in addressing the prudential aspects of standing; and, 3.) With respect to the prudential considerations of standing, certain aspects of this case are analogous to the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur.”

Jeff Schreiber of America’s Right http://www.americasright.com/ has shared his insights into the Berg case with objectiveness and professionalism.  He was  in the Clerk of Court’s office in the Federal Courthouse in Philadelphia doing part of his job as a legal writer and reading the civil cases that had been filed that day including Berg’s.  I encourage any reader here to follow his blog and note Berg’s recent reaction to the denial.  I look forward to his thoughts on Anderson.

Truth In our Time and numerous bloggers are convinced that,  “Courts throughout the USA aided and abetted the usurpation of the Presidency by refusing to hear cases challenging the citizenship of Barack Obama, now, major media is doing the same thing.”  Citing network news refusal to broadcast a commercial questioning his citizenship- the video can be viewed at the site  http://www.truthinourtime.com/2009/01/obama-citizenship-commerical.html.

Does Obama have divided loyalties?  I doubt it.  Really, the minute Obama would act to place Kenya or Indonesia above the best interests of the USA, the wrath of the domestic and foreign media, Congress, the Senate and even Nancy Pelosi would jump to attention and outrage.  Wouldn’t they? 

Is Obama factually eligible?  I don’t know.  http://www.obamaconspiracy.org/2009/01/natural-born-citizenship-for-dummies/ offers a pretty good glance at the issues but still no solution.  Perhaps the entire language of what makes one an American is extinct and moot.  A large reference to citizenship cases and notations can be found at http://tesibria.typepad.com/whats_your_evidence/the-natural-born-citizenship-clause-updated.html.

Whatever the evidence may bear in the future, on January 20, 2009, Barack Hussein Obama is most likely going to place his hand on former President Lincoln’s Bible and swear to the duty of allegiance to the United States of America.   This bond will be administered by Chief Justice  Roberts who will carry out his ceremonial duty of swearing in the next President of the United States.  If Roberts was to consider the possibility that he is swearing in a man who doesn’t  meet fundamental eligibility requirements, I imagine he would be removed unceremoniously and rapidly from the bench.  Or perhaps made a hero to those who seek the legal means to force Obama’s citizenship discloure.  Maybe the failure to deny Anderson will be enough for pause.  Berg, Donofrio and others have certainly made their cases before the justices and while not hearing the cases formally, must be aware of Obama’s current question of ineligibility for the office he is about to be sworn into.

The Supremes have once again spoken in saying nothing,  and by leaving the Anderson Amicus hanging have further blurred the waters.   

Obama, by delivering his official birth records to support his compliance with the Constitution and his professed transparency in government would alleviate future burdens on The Court and her people.  I don’t think we can hold our breath that long.  Instead, we’ll watch a new chapter of American history unfold with a democrat, black man leading our destiny either for the next four or eight years, unless a court forces him to prove his citizenship and it turns out he is ineligible.  I pray for a sufficient bond of union between Obama and America to allow him to make worthwhile choices in keeping America the land of the free and home of the brave. 

God Bless America.

Read Full Post »

Obama’s Citizenship and Pedigree in Conference at Supreme Court

“If you want a friend in Washington, get a dog,” said, President Harry Truman.  The Bush’s are moving out to fancy dancy Preston Hallow, TX with their dogs while the Obama family will be getting a new puppy when they move into the White House.

“The breeds we’ve chosen for the Obama family represent a variety of sizes, energy levels and temperaments, yet all are well-established in their coat type, to ensure that they are a good match for any allergy sufferer,” says AKC spokesperson Lisa Peterson. “Dogs that are AKC registered have pedigrees reaching back often hundreds of years, and so the characteristics that make them better companions for allergy suffers are fixed through decades of breeding for consistent breed type and predictability.” http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalradar/2008/07/vetting-obamas.html

Obama, it seems has been bred with the same predictability as a lot of other political dogs.  His characteristics of  avoiding full disclosure remind me of a dog  you want to like and aren’t allergic to, but it just keeps lifting it’s leg to pee on the carpet while it’s looking at you- right in the eye.  Obama’s own lineage and pedigree have yielded him to offhandedly, call himself a mutt.  Language and politically correct driven terminology aside, some are saying that they were offended by his self-deprecating description of himself as a “mutt.”  Obama’s biracial heritage while it has not been verified by his birth certificate, seems to be the son of a white mother from Kansas and an African father from Kenya.  It is that lineage, and the laws of the land that might keep a him from taking office. 

It is a remarkable achievement to have a bi-racial, black in appearance, man as President Elect.  Putting the applause for America aside, it seems we know more about vetting his dog than him.  His associations with Ayers, Retzko, ACORN, etc.,  have been circumspect  and any improprieties, cast aside by his supporters.  Days before the Electoral College meets, still we have questions about his pedigree and breeding that could prohibit Obama and 12 million other immigrants from holding the highest office is the land, President- and a whole host of lawsuits are looking for answers.  Some of those cases are reviewed here in relative Main Stream Media- The Chicago Tribune Chronicle.  http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/front/6145787.html.

The Supreme Court is going to be meeting in a full conference today, December 5, 2008 regarding Donofrio v Wells. Docket http://origin.www.supremecourtus.gov/docket/08a407.htm.   The case challenges Obama’s eligibility under the natural born clause of the U.S. Constitution.  The case was re-submitted to Justice Thomas of whom Obama said, “I don’t think that he [Thomas] was a strong enough jurist or legal thinker at the time, for that elevation, setting aside the fact that I profoundly disagree with his interpretations of a lot of the constitution.”  Thomas is at the opposite end of Obama’s political spectrum including anti-affirmative action, anti-abortion, and anti-prisoner rights views.  Could Thomas be just getting even in referring this to a full conference?

Justice Souter had rejected the petition, known as an application for a stay of writ of certiorari that asked the court to prevent the meeting of the Electoral College on Dec. 15, which will certify Obama as the 44th president of the United States and its first African-American president.

Some have argued that the eligibility issue should be amended to render naturalized citizens and immigrants the right to serve as President.  As it stands now Article II, Section 1, Clause 5 provides:

No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Of-fices who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.
A New York Times article, A Constitutional Anachronism, writes, “The provision has long since outlived its usefulness, if it had any in the first place. ” http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9D07EEDB1F38F935A3575AC0A9659C8B63 
Orrin Hatch, a Senate Republican, and Vic Snyder, a House Democrat, pushed for amendments to rid the Constitution of that requirement but the law stands unchanged and it is the obligation of someone, in some court to uphold that law.
Attorney Sarah Herlihy wrote on the citizenship issue: “…globalization is the thing that makes the need to abolish the requirement more and more persuasive, Americans’ subsequent perceptions about globalization are the very things that will prevent Americans from embracing the idea of eliminating the natural born requirement,” http://lawreview.kentlaw.edu/articles/81-1/Herlihy.pdf   More insulting she says, “Whether it is because of fear, racism, religious intolerance, or blind faith in the decisions of the Founding Fathers, Americans want to find a way to avoid changing the natural born citizen provision to allow natural-ized citizens to be eligible for the presidency.”
The amazing twist is that the author is attorney Sarah Herlihy who works for the the law firm of Kirkland & Ellis LLP, in Chicago.  One of the partners, Bruce I. Ettelson,  http://www.kirkland.com/sitecontent.cfm?contentID=220&itemID=7845  happens to be a member of finance committees of U.S. Senators Barack Obama and Richard Durbin.  http://www.kirkland.com/sitecontent.cfm?contentID=220&itemID=8909  It is always so convenient for President Elect Obama to have made so many friends in his short stint as Senator.
I do not believe that our Supreme Court has fear, racism, religious intolerance or blind faith in interpreting the written laws of the land.  SCOTUS today will review Donofrio’s case regarding the law and will announce most likely Monday; if this case will be heard, referred back to the lower court or dismissed. 
I accept a foreigners loyalty to America upon becoming a citizen but have misgivings that there would not continue to be a strong attachment to a persons country of origin.  Look at the Cuban sector of Miami and tell me that ties have been severed.  No matter that you maybe born in America, traditions of Chinese, Italians, Irish, Mexican, etc., are held near and dear to many  and that is what makes America great.  The ancestral connection though, could run deeper to those not born here and those loyalties could impair his abilities as chief executive and commander-in-chief and, without intention act detrimentally upon United States.
Each member of the Supreme Court has been fully vetted while Justice Surrick the Berg v Obama case also hanging at SCOTUS, claims that Obama’s vetting came from the long campaign.  To claim that a political race is an investigation is ludicrous and  not good enough for me but to my dismay it has been proven true unless this case or another one like it hears testimony from Obama himself and is witness to his full pedigree proving that he is eligible and does not have dual citizenship and meets all the qualification of the law. 
I do not want to see our Constitution in the doghouse. 
For a bit more on this topic check out http://guntotingliberal.com/ who has a recent image of Obama’s driver’s license that gives clue to deception and an image that could be his photo at birth at http://thebruceblog.wordpress.com/2008/12/04/breaking-new-proof-its-true-obama-was-not-born-in-the-us-what-now/

Read Full Post »

TRANSPARENCY:
an open letter to Barack Hussein Obama

“The most important office in a democracy is the office of citizen.  That means you guys.”  Barack Obama. 

It is becoming painfully obvious that Obama promise of transparency in office, may have been a fib.  Obama continues to dance around the Court of Law to avoid producing his authentic, verifiable birth certificate that would indicate if he meets the qualifications of President under existing Constitutional and Common Law. 

“Barack Obama ran a campaign promising TRANSPARENCY. Yet his own records, the most basic records necessary to determine his eligibility for the highest office in the land, the Presidency, are vaulted away under lock and key, inaccessible to both the public and public authorities.” http://www.thebulletin.us/site/news.cfm?newsid=20210273

Read Full Post »

Obama Lawsuits Pending at Supreme Court

“So how many Americans does it take to verify the birth status of POTUS-Elect Barrack Obama?

The world may never know! ”

(Sorry Tootsie Pop but I have always loved that commercial with the little owl) 
http://readmylipstickprint.blogspot.com/2008/11/asleep-at-wheel.html 

Is it Constitutional Law or Common Law that dictates the qualification of a natural born citizen and eligibility to hold the office of President?  I don’t think the Supreme Court is certain who has standing in seeking out the true citizenship and authentic birth certificate of President Elect Obama.  SCOTUS will be gathering in conference this Friday, December 5, 2008 to find out.  The Supreme Court judges will hopefully not deviate from their responsibility, which is the strict interpretation of written law.  I hope they will allow both the Berg and Donofrio cases to proceed against the grain of popularity, and with the scale of justice.

Leo C Donofrio, SCOTUS Docket No. 08A407, Donofrio v. Wells, and recently Cort Wrotnowski, (SCOTUS Docket No. 08A469 lay in wait for review or dismissal at SCOTUS.  Berg hasn’t gone anywhere for the moment- from his SCOTUS appeal,

“Judge Surrick claimed
the DNC’s promises were not actually promises but
instead of statement of intentions. Judge Surrick
went on further claiming, “The ‘promises’ that
Petitioner identifies arc statements of principle and
intent in the political realm. They are not enforceable
promises under contract law. Indeed, our political
system could not function if every political message
articulated by a campaign could be characterized as
a legally binding contact enforceable by individual
voters. Of course, voters are free to vote out of office
those politicians seen to have breached campaign
promises and Federal courts, however, are not and
31
cannot be in the business of enforcing political
rhetoric.”

Ain’t that a kick in the pants?  It all goes back to the fact that if Philip J. Berg, American citizen, and former attorney general of Pennsylvania doesn’t have the “standing” to bring this type of lawsuit against Obama, then who in America does have standing? How is it that the lower court has decided that a citizen can not enforce there own Constitution in a court of law?

What the Judge missed is that Berg wasn’t challenging political rhetoric at all, he was and is, challenging Constitutional and Common Law that dictates who is eligible.  Berg’s filing to SCOTUS can be found here- http://www.sectalk.com/boards/showthread.php?t=62655&referrerid=1579

At the very least one hopes Berg’s case gets remanded back to the lower court who created this grave error in its ruling and at the very best scenario, The Supreme Court agrees to hear the case.

More filings are pouring in to lower and federal court to get to the bottom of Obama’s eligibility with Darrel Reese Hunter of Texas,  who ran as a Democratic Presidential nominee http://www.ontheissues.org/senate/Darrel_Hunter.htm.   According to his financial records he didn’t have much success in fund raising, garnering merely $200 in support of himself.  http://query.nictusa.com/cgi-bin/can_detail/P40003022/ . Daniel John Essek has also filed a demand that Obama provide a copy of his birth certificate.  http://www.essek4senate.org/ 

Essek and Hunter have put themselves out there for scrutiny, whatever there motives.  They as citizens, voters and wanna be elected officials, are pursuing fair competition for a fair election.  In all fairness to Obama, I haven’t seen their birth certificates either, but I’d bet they show you theirs if you showed them yours.  Don’t forget about Alan Keyes, former Reagan administration official, Ambassador and presidential candidate was among petitioners who filed an action last Thursday in the Superior Court of California seeking a court order enjoining Barack Obama’s California Electors from signing the Certificate of Vote until documentation showing the president-elect’s constitutional eligibility to serve as president is produced.  

 Keyes v Bowen, Superior Court, Sacramento, 34-2008-80000096-cu-wm-gds. Read it here

On other news from Hawaii http://www.earthfrisk.com/blog/?p=135#comment-7990  claims that none of HI hospitals have a record of birth for Obama.  In a most impressive compilation http://gto7.wordpress.com/2008/12/03/shocker-why-obama-will-not-be-president-in-january/ writes of the discrepancies in Hawaii law that may have allowed Obama and anyone else to obtain a Hawaiian birth certificate, even if he/she wasn’t born there. 

Shame, shame on Hawaii.  Is it still that easy to obtain a fraudulent birth certificate in Hawaii?  OMG- talk about a loophole in national security.   How can Governor Lingle in good conscious allow this to continue?  No wonder Andy Martin has been so persistent.  Here we have a government, capable of tracking our every move and it still issues documents to people born in foreign lands. 

“I’m a simple guy. Tell me what the rules are, apply those rules to everyone equally and I am a happy camper. However, if you tell me what the rules are, apply them to only some of us and throw them away when it suits you, I am not a happy camper.”

http://downwithjugears.blogspot.com/2008/12/supremes-get-obama-citizenship-hot.html 

Humph, I am not happy and I don’t think another lick on my Tootsie Roll Tootsie Pop is going to make a bit of difference.  Oh wait- isn’t Tootsie Roll HQ in Chicago?  Ah huh, another suspect in Obama’s circle of friends like Ayers and Rezko coming from Chicago.  I just bit into the tootsie roll part and lost a filling.  Go figure.

Read Full Post »

The birth certificate issue really isn’t about Obama, it is more about the law. 

Since not one single person in the whole word has ever seen President Elect Obama’s birth certificate, other than maybe him, one wonders if those pursuing his eligibility all the way to SCOTUS- The Supreme Court, have given thought that it is illegal to hire illegal aliens and that the Electoral College could be found in contempt by not verifying his birth certificate.  He may very well be just as illegal as his Auntie Zeituni in Boston. 

“Anyone employing or contracting with an illegal alien without verifying his work authorization status is guilty of a misdemeanor. Aliens and employers violating immigration laws are subject to arrest, detention, and seizure of their vehicles or property. In addition, individuals or entities who engage in racketeering enterprises that commit (or conspire to commit) immigration-related felonies are subject to private civil suits for treble damages and injunctive relief…..An employer has constructive knowledge that an employee is an illegal unauthorized worker if a reasonable person would infer it from the facts.”  http://www.fairus.org/site/PageServer?pagename=iic_immigrationissuecentersbcdd 

Couldn’t a reasonable person infer from the fact that he has hidden his birth certificate that he has hidden the truth and may not only be illegal, but unable to hold the Office of President? 

A lot of excellent workers are legal aliens and have green cards to allow them to get up ‘n go to work here in the land of the free home of the brave but not for the job of President.  Obama has never shown us his birth certificate.  He has already, admitted he had Kenyan citizenship on his website,  “Since Sen. Obama has neither renounced his U.S. citizenship nor sworn an oath of allegiance to Kenya, his Kenyan citizenship automatically expired on Aug. 4,1982.”  http://fightthesmears.com/articles/5/birthcertificate.   Whereby having had dual citizenship should have preempted him, it hasn’t so far, and perhaps then a natural born citizen means a “citizens of the United States at birth” as defined by U.S. Code, Title 8, Section 1401.  Maybe he is eligible, maybe he is not. 

Civilian Obama has said, “He did drugs at one point”  Pot and Cocaine being his choice. http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,240992,00.html Should the potential leader of the free world undergo random drug testing(s)?  Employers do it to employees all the time.   I kinda doubt Obama uses illegal substances, he still smokes cigarettes and should be allowed to light up a Marlboro whenever the heck he feel like it, better than a joint with his finger on a nuclear missile.  

“I believe what the country is looking for is someone who is open, honest and candid about themselves, said Robert Gibbs, Obama’s spokesman. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/01/02/AR2007010201359.html  Also citing the WaPo,Obama said,  “I got high [to] push questions of who I was out of my mind.”   Some twenty years later the question of who Obama is, still lingers.  Silence seems to be golden when it comes to his birth certificate.  In these matters, Obama for being a tall man, has fallen far short of being open, honest and candid.

There are a lot of lines left blank on his job application.  Where are his college transcripts that the rest of us are required to produce when applying for a job.  In order to enter the military you have to pass the physical, but our future Commander and Chief Obama, in his infinite wisdom, deferred to a one page document that said he is good health.

Not many immigration cases or failed drug tests get prosecuted or punished.  The punishment the U.S. Constitution will have gotten if Obama is found ineligible, would be a punishment that America should not have to bear.   

The Supreme Court has not decided to hear any matters regarding Obama’s citizenship or the election-yet. Friday, December 5, 2008 will be a big day for America and Leo Donofrio whose case has a conference before all nine Judges.  The most interesting thing to date about his case is that DONOFRIO V. WELLS was distributed for conference of December 5, 2008 by the entire Court after a prior referral of the application by Justice Thomas.

Donofrio has been updating his case against Wells SCOTUS Docket No. 08A407, Donofrio v. Wells and the Cort Wrotnowski, (SCOTUS Docket No. 08A469) on his site http://naturalborncitizen.wordpress.com/. At http://www.obamacrimes.com/ is the Berg v Obama et al filing but he’s been too busy to update with the deadline set by the Court of December 1, 2008 having passed.  Most certainly he is preparing more briefs to get a rapid resolution or at the very least, perhaps a stay in the Electoral College.  Best bet for Berg info is at –http://www.americasright.com/2008/12/berg-to-file-emergency-injunction-today.html

There is a great argument on whether the issue of his citizenship relies on the Constitutional Law or Common Law over at the Texas Darling Website and it you have a clear moment is certainly worth the read- In part, “The Common Law has always been conflicted on the subject of dual allegiance and naturalization, read Mackenzie and Cockburn. I never said it wasn’t. The Common Law has always allowed limitations, take a look at the various Acts of Succession, Union and Settlement. There is nothing in the natural-born citizen clause to make a Common Law lawyer blink for one second. “To all intents and purposes” is an outright acknowledgment that one is dealing with a fiction which may be ignored at will by the Common Law, it could as easily read “As if”. That is the source of my disagreement with Aleinikoff’s view. If I say, “I accept, to all intents and purposes, that John Doe is a citizen of the United States”, I am saying (a) that I do not know that he is, (b) that I do not believe that he is, or that I strongly doubt the proposition, and (c) that I will nonetheless act upon the supposition that he is until such time as the proposition is either proved or disproved. If you apply English Common Law, as it stands today, Obama would be eligible; if you apply Australian Common Law, as it stands today, he wouldn’t be; if you apply Canadian Common Law, as it stands today, his position would be in doubt. If you regard the US Constitution as a Common Law document he isn’t eligible under US Common Law. ”  http://texasdarlin.wordpress.com/2008/12/02/a-reply-to-donofrio/#more-5277  and beats the whole issue with a stick very eloquently here http://texasdarlin.wordpress.com/2008/11/28/natural-born-citizens-or-how-to-beat-a-subject-to-death-with-a-stick/ .

http://aconservativeedge.wordpress.com/2008/12/01/president-elect-barack-h-obama-your-long-form-birth-certificate-is-due-today-supreme-court-of-the-united-states/  Mr. Vieira cited a fraud ruling in a 1977 case called U.S. v. Prudden, which he feels applies in this case.
“Silence can only be equated with fraud when there is a legal and moral duty to speak or when an inquiry left unanswered would be intentionally misleading,” the ruling reads. “We cannot condone this shocking conduct … If that is the case we hope our message is clear. This sort of deception will not be tolerated and if this is routine it should be corrected immediately.” 

“The Republican Party of Lincoln has become the party of deceit, dissimulation, duplicity, and double-dealing. The party that claims a moral high ground is seemingly without morality when it comes to the seats of power – they will and have done anything and everything to discredit their opponents as they grapple for control.” http://amusedpen.wordpress.com/2008/12/02/a-vile-gop/ unloads on the GOP like there is no tomorrow and blames this citizenship mess on Republicans.  It misses the whole point that Obama should just take the moral high ground. 

You and I are his employer.  You and I pay his salary.  I want his birth certificate.  I want a President who qualifies under the U.S. Constitution.  I want the Supreme Court to Uphold the laws of the U.S. Constitution and Common Law.  Of course, I want to hit the mega zillion lottery.  Don’t you want it all too?

Read Full Post »

15 days until the Electoral College meets.  Obama is going about his business like there are no lingering questions regarding his citizenship and eligibility issues.  He’s nominated Hillary Clinton as SOS with full knowledge she will violate the Constitution by accepting the position- so much for swearing to uphold the laws he studied at Harvard, and the rest of us live and die by.   

He might turn his head a bit with that new tick he seems to have developed, when he sees the full page ad in his hometown newspaper, The Chicago Tribune on December 1, 2008.  Not only does it call out Obama’s citizenship but states:

“Each member of the Electoral College, who is committed to casting a vote

on December 15, 2008, has a constitutional duty to make certain you are

a natural-born citizen. As of today, there is no evidence in the public

record (nor have you provided any) that defeats the claim that you are

barred by law from assuming the Office of President because you fail the

Constitution’s eligibility requirements.

All state Electors are now on Notice that unless you provide documentary

evidence before December 15, that conclusively establishes your eligibility,

they cannot cast a vote for you without committing treason to the Constitution.

 

The ad comes from

We The People Foundation

For Constitutional Education, Inc.

 

www.WeThePeopleFoundation.org  http://www.wethepeoplefoundation.org/ 

2458 Ridge Road Queensbury, NY 12804 ifo@GiveMeLiberty.org

see the ad  http://www.wethepeoplefoundation.org/UPDATE/misc2008/ChicagoTribune-ObamaLtr-Nov-2008.pdf  asking in part-

An Open Letter

to Barack Obama:

Are you a Natural Born

Citizen of the U.S.?

Are you legally eligible to

hold the Office of President?

 

 

 

 

Read Full Post »

Older Posts »