President Barack Obama is believed to be among more than 200 nominations for the 2009 Nobel Peace Prize.
Alfred Nobel who among other things invented dynamite, created five annual prizes—chemistry, physics, literature, medicine and peace—in his will to honor, “The greatest benefit on mankind.” Past nominees include Adolf Hitler, Josef Stalin, Benito Mussolini, Fidel Castro, just to name a few. Al Gore constantly reminds us he won. Kissinger’s acceptance caused uproar over the former National Security Advisor’s role in a secret war against Cambodia and the overthrow of the Chilean government.
Being nominated, obviously does not reflect on the merits of one’s accomplishments. Obama has been President for what, all of six weeks? How have Obama’s deeds and actions been “The greatest benefit on mankind?”
Obama’s nomination demeans the process and should he win, will be testament to the fact that he has won only because he has a black face. Martin Luther King and Nelson Mandela accomplished things worthy of recognition, not the color of their skin.
President Obama has no chemistry, physics or medical background leaving only a prize for literature or peace to be afforded to him. To think that Obama’s actions are on the same level as the accomplishments of Nobel Peace Prize laureate Bishop Desmond Tutu, is ludicrous. This brings us to the category of literature to support his nomination.
The democratic party’s rock star president wrote, “The Audacity of Hope,” and “Dreams from My Father.” The audacity to nominate Obama for a Nobel Prize based on race is foremost disgruntling, he has done nothing so far as President, and to think that his literature supports a nomination of a Nobel Prize in any category, is pure hooey.
President Barack Obama’s 2010 budget is the most recent thing he has authored. On the title page above the words 2010 Budget Obama writes: “A New Era of Responsibility.” “For too long our budget has not told the whole truth about how precious tax dollars are spent,” Obama said in remarks ahead of the release of his $3.55 trillion spending blueprint, which projected a huge $1.17 trillion deficit. “Large sums have been left off the books, including the true cost of fighting in Iraq and Afghanistan. And that kind of dishonest accounting is not how you run your family budgets at home. It’s not how your government should run its budgets either,” he said. {Reuters} This sounds familiar from the campaign trail.
Tony Fratto, Bush’s former White House spokesman specializing on economic issues responded saying that “Trying to mask huge spending increases under the cloak of ‘fiscal responsibility’ is the height of audacity, our budgets were honest, open and transparent. Every dime spent was presented, debated, voted on and counted.” Congressman Obama didn’t bother to vote too often, but as a member of Congress, he is equally responsible for our 10 Trillion dollar debt. http://projects.washingtonpost.com/congress/members/o000167/votes/
I highly doubt that the budget qualifies as a piece of literature or that it supports any peace processes; rather it is another piece of crap and certainly President Obama is not meritorious enough to receive a Nobel Peace Prize.
Updated, Friday, October 10, 2009. President Obama has indeed won the Nobel Peace Prize, “for giving the world “hope for a better future” and striving for nuclear disarmament, in a surprise award that drew both warm praise and sharp criticism. http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20091009/pl_nm/us_nobel_peace_obama
Open wide, say ahhh and check out these posts on the A/H1N1 Swine Flu from Ahrcanum, where the conspiracy spreads as fast as the virus itself.
Conspiracy can sometimes be triggered by real world events. Subscribe NOW in the top right margin for further updates.