Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Posts Tagged ‘Surrick’

Omaba Kenya BC

From birthers to plain old Americans who still believe in the Constitution of The United States of America that says that a president must be a natural born citizen, it sure would be nice to know the truth about President Obama’s birth certificate records.

Now comes the emergence of a Kenyan birth certificate from Orly Taitz. 

HuffPost has disputes its authenticity as does Karl Rove, saying:

  • Kenya was a Dominion the date this certificate was allegedly issued and would not become a republic for 8 months.
  • Mombasa belonged to Zanzibar when Obama was born, not Kenya.
  • Obama’s father’s village would be nearer to Nairobi, not Mombasa.
  • The number 47O44– 47 is Obama’s age when he became president, followed by the letter O (not a zero) followed by 44–he is the 44th president.

sourced- http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/08/03/kenyan-birth-certificate_n_249850.html

Hawaii issued another statement last week claiming that they have President Obama’s authenticated copy- alas no original as they made the switch to electronic documents years ago.

Read Full Post »

It seems it would be easier to find a needle in a hay stack than for Obama himself, to produce an authentic copy of his birth certificate.

Main Stream Media has all but dismissed coverage of any lingering questions regarding is eligibility to hold office under The U.S. Constitution-  Article II, Section 1, Clause 4 and Article VI, Clause 2. of which should need no explanation.  Instead, suddenly Google has 729 news articles in it’s query and most dismiss the entire topic as being implausible. http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2008/12/09/birth_certificate/  has a review of all the “half baked legal theories,” and points to some on the fringe while ignoring the underlying facts that President Elect Obama has still refused to authenticate himself.

David Horowitz at Town Hall wrote, “It is not conservatism; it is sore loserism and quite radical in its intent. Respect for election results is one of the most durable bulwarks of our unity as a nation.”  http://townhall.com/Columnists/DavidHorowitz/2008/12/08/obama_derangement_syndrome_conservatives_need_to_shut_up_about_the_birth_certificate

I fail to define seeking the truth for the highest office in the land, radical.  How is it radical to want to see our laws upheld?   Like most folks I live within the law.  Except for my last speeding ticket some ten years ago, I have a clean record.  I vote, work, pay taxes, have a family, and have a mundane life.  I attend church regularly where my clergy does not claim to “God Damn America.”  I am not a radical.  

When it comes to my individual right to have standing  in the court of law, I fail to see how the media does not strongly object.  Specifically Justice Surrick in Berg v Obama, et al said that Berg has no standing to challenge Obama’s citizenship- again we must ask, if he has no standing then who does?  Dr. Edwin Vieira, Jr., Ph.D., J.D. writes…  “And, particularly in this situation, judges will desperately desire to escape having to take upon themselves the responsibility for the political consequences—let alone the odium whipped up by Obama’s touts in the big media—that will flow from the courts’ declaring Obama ineligible for the Office of President. Which responsibility and vilification wily judges can craftily evade by denying that voters, electors, candidates, and various other would-be litigants have “standing” to challenge his eligibility. For then the judges can claim both that, on the one hand, they have no authority to declare Obama ineligible because no litigant has “standing” to demand such relief, and that, on the other hand, by dismissing the cases solely on “standing” grounds they have not declared him eligible, either http://www.newswithviews.com/Vieira/edwin186.htm

In the National Press Room after some long winded comments which can be reviewed with a degree of fairness at http://www.americasright.com/2008/12/challenging-obamas-eligibility-just.html Berg said,  “My case in district court was dismissed for one reason – standing,” Berg said. “According to the court, I don’t have standing, Bob doesn’t have standing, no one in this room has standing. We’re asking for one qualification out of three. We know he’s at least 35 years old. We’ll give him the 14 years in the country. We just want to know that he is natural born. It’s not that difficult.”  Apparently it is.

Horowitz’ article,  Obama Derangement Syndrome: Conservatives Need to Shut Up About the Birth Certificate asks “what difference does it make if Obama was born on U.S. Soil and that advocates will argue “Constitutional Principle”.  He is correct, I and others will argue rationally for my country and my Constitution every day, with every last breath, and not shut up.  There is no civil unrest, no riots, no nothing but freedom of speech.

Donofrio, Berg, Cort, and even Andy Martin have done much to uphold the laws of this land as the original signers of the Constitution intended.    It is not about disenfranchising or challenging the 65 million votes Obama garnered in the election that are being challenged, it’s the fact that Obama should provide proof that he was legally eligible in the first place.  We respect the outcome of elections as proof in Bush v Gore and even in those ballots still being counted for of all people, Al Franken.  From The NY Times “The missing votes favored Mr. Franken, who would fall 46 more votes behind Mr. Coleman if the recount numbers are used.” http://www.nytimes.com/2008/12/09/us/politics/09minnesota.html?_r=1&ref=politics   I fail to see how more votes would not assist Mr. Franken and that goes to show the quality of MSM election reporting.

The bailout has gone from billions to trillions in just days.  Were Obama’s eligibility falter, the outcome would be tragic.  It would be a bigger tragedy to have allowed a subversion of  America’s core document, The Constitution.

The first Chief Justice of the United States, John Jay, to George Washington in 1787 in a letter wrote:

Permit me to hint, whether it would be wise and seasonable to provide a strong check to the admission of foreigners into the administration of our national Government; and to declare expressly that the Commander in Chief of the American army shall not be given to, nor devolve on any but a natural born citizen.

Perhaps the Supremes have read, ““Let it be remembered that civil liberty consists, not in a right to every man to do just what he pleases, but it consists in an equal right to all citizens to have, enjoy, and do, in peace, security and without molestation, whatever the equal and constitutional laws of the country admit to be consistent with the public good.”

 Time will tell if denial and disenfranchisement of Obama’s citizenship is consistent with the public good.

God Bless America

Read Full Post »

The audacity of Obama’s eligibility!  Is Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama eligible for President, or not?  Critics and adversaries have spent a lot of time and money raising doubt and spreading rumors that Obama is not a citizen.  In Obama’s refusal to provide proof and only file motions to dismiss, he is beginning to alert the questioning, rational, voting public into making a rational conclusion and judgment that perhaps he has something to hide after all.

The case of Berg vs Obama was seeking to clarify in Federal Court, Obama’s citizenship status.  Berg vs Omama was filed the case over two months ago, taking more than 60 days to reach an opinion of the court. The motion may be read in its entirety here http://obamacrimes.com/attachments/041_Obama,%20Plaintiff/’s%20Motion%20for%20Summary%20Judgment%20against%20Obama%20and%20the%20DNC.pdfAccordiing to the Philadelphia Daily News, Saturday Morning on-line edition- http://www.philly.com/dailynews/local/20081025_Judge_rejects_Montco_lawyer_s_bid_to_have_Obama_removed_from_ballot.html Judge 

Judge Surrick has dismissed the lawsuit.  In a 34 page memorandum and opinion, the judge said “Berg’s allegations of harm were “too vague and attenuated to confer standing on him or any other voters.”  In pursuing the claims that Obama was not a natural-born citizen they were, ” frivolous and not worth of discussion.” In addition, that Berg’s arguments to the contrary, “ventured into the unreasonable.”

http://www.paed.uscourts.gov/ is the web site for the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania.  Any rulings can be found under recently filed opinions for free, however it does not appear here yet. The PACER Service Center is the Federal Judiciaries centralized registration, billing, and technical support center for electronic access to U.S. District, Bankruptcy, and Appellate court records http://pacer.psc.uscourts.gov/uspci.html You must register and pay 8 cents per page to access these records. 

How is unreasonable to seek out through the court, the determination of qualifications to achieve The Office of President of The United States of America?  Berg listed a total of 56 questions that were by some accounts, a stretch into an abyss of technicalities and accusations, but the simple request of requiring Obama to present a certified birth certificate and not a certificate of live birth has been denied not only to Berg but to all Americans seeking truth and justice in a marred political and judicial system. Berg only last week sought an ORDER ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT     http://obamacrimes.com/attachments/041_Obama,%20Plaintiff/’s%20Motion%20for%20Summary%20Judgment%20against%20Obama%20and%20the%20DNC.pdf.  Berg’s attempted to require the court to cite Rule 56 of civil proceedings {From the Legal Information Institute http://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frcp/Rule56.htm } in that since Obama failed to deny the accuracy, it is” (2) Opposing Party’s Obligation to Respond. When a motion for summary judgment is properly made and supported, an opposing party may not rely merely on allegations or denials in its own pleading; rather, its response must — by affidavits or as otherwise provided in this rule — set out specific facts showing a genuine issue for trial. If the opposing party does not so respond, summary judgment should, if appropriate, be entered against that party.”  Berg was basically saying that since Obama did not respond to this motion, Obama does not meet eligibility as President and that all of the Admissions directed to Obama and the DNC are [sic-should have been] deemed “ADMITTED.”  Therefore, Obama must immediately withdraw his candidacy for President.   https://ahrcanum.wordpress.com/2008/10/24/citizenship-lawsuits-linger-for-obama/  

 

 

Obama’s certificate of birth, while not a birth certificate can be found at http://fightthesmears.com/articles/5/birthcertificate  That doesn’t prove it is real. Only that there is no credible evidence that it’s fake.  His campaign has a burden of proving otherwise, and they have failed to do so and will not be required to instead filing motions for dismissal rather than providing proof.

Both Nominees and selected Vice Presidents, all four of them- Obama, Biden, McCain and Palin should be asked to provide a copy of their original birth certificates- not just live birth.  http://gretawire.foxnews.com/2008/10/24/ok-the-internet-rumors-about-the-birth-certificate-lets-end-the-rumors-and-the-viral-nature-of-them/ Greta thinks so too.  

The matter of Obama’s citizenship records will not cease with the ruling from the the Presiding Judge- The Honorable R. Barclay Surrick, United States District Judge, United States Courthouse, 601 Market Street, Room 8614, Philadelphia, PA 19106,  Deputy clerk: Michael Finney  (267) 299-7639 Secretary: Donna Donahue (267) 299-7631. Today is Saturday, and it seems rather convenient that the court has issued its ruling over the weekend whereby,  no comments can be made to the press or enter the entire findings into court records.  

I’d bet my piece of sweet potato pie that Berg will file an appeal.  There is a  draft template that after a few revisions anyone in California and The United States will be able to use to sue Barack H. Obama for his certificate of live birth.”   Just fill in your name and file it –  http://mitchell-langbert.blogspot.com/2008/10/draft-cal-template-to-sue-for-bocolb.html

Read Full Post »