Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Posts Tagged ‘Presidency’

It has been certifiable madness that there are so many lawsuits in the courts in an effort to get Barack Obama to provide his “vault version” of his birth certificate in order to prove his eligibility to become President.  Instead, we the public are shown a fraudulent birth certificate (short version)- a certificate of live birth,  that was deemed credible by factcheck.org (which by the way, is funded by the Anneneburg Foundation–the board Obama sat on for years with William Ayers of–no conflict of interest there!). Instead of making the lawsuits go away instantly by providing the vault version of his birth certificate, he has refused to do so. Wouldn’t logic dictate to provide it and the lawsuit would go away?  Instead, we have a Democrat, Philip J. Berg, Esq., http://www.obamacrimes.com/ petitioning the U.S. Supreme Court for a ruling on whether his, case Berg vs Obama, et al has standing, and requests that the entire Presidential Election not occur on November 4. Berg vs Obama No. 08-cv-04083. http://dockets.justia.com/docket/court-paedce/case_no-2:2008cv04083/case_id-281573/

Yesterday it seems that privacy laws were broken in Hawaii.   “Hawaii Health Department spokeswoman Janice Okubo told the Tribune state privacy laws and attorney general guidance barred her from confirming the certificate’s authenticity. But, “It looks exactly the same as my own birth certificate,” Okubo said.”  HOW DOES OKUBO KNOW WHAT IT LOOKS LIKE?  http://www.upi.com/Top_News/2008/10/30/Rumor_questions_Obamas_birth_certificate/UPI-64261225393575/  Hiding for months behind privacy laws and legal wrangling, the Health Department Director Dr. Chiyome Fukino has refused to issue a copy of his vaulted birth certificate.  Then, just in time for Halloween trick and treats we have Fukino saying in a report from Associated Press:  “HONOLULU (AP) – State officials say there’s no doubt Barack Obama was born in Hawaii.  Health Department Director Dr. Chiyome Fukino says she and the registrar of vital statistics, Alvin Onaka, have personally verified that the health department holds Obama’s original birth certificate. Fukino says that no state official, including Gov. Linda Lingle, ever instructed that Obama’s certificate be handled differently from any other.  She says state law bars release of a certified birth certificate to anyone who does not have a tangible interest in it.” http://www.khnl.com/Global/story.asp?S=9275581  “State law (Hawai’i Revised Statutes §338-18) prohibits the release of a certified birth certificate to persons who do not have a tangible interest in the vital record,” said DOH Director Chiyome Fukino. “Therefore, I as Director of Health for the State of Hawai’i, along with the Registrar of Vital Statistics who has statutory authority to oversee and maintain these type of vital records, have personally seen and verified that the Hawai’i State Department of Health has Sen. Obama’s original birth certificate on record in accordance with state policies and procedures.”

In a complete head spinning act like the girl from the movie The Exorcist, she makes a statement that not only has she seen Obama’s birth certificate, but that it is authentic and he was in fact born in Hawaii.  Well, that’s a bunch of vomit.  This is the woman who once said,        “All of the evidence that we have says that the beaches are as safe now as they were before the sewage spill.” http://thinkexist.com/quotes/dr._chiyome_fukino/  Seeing that she is so well versed in crap, we are expected to believe that she got off her high horse and broke the law to peer into a sealed document that is protected by her own state of Hawaii’s laws on privacy?

Governor Lingle, clearly has indicated that Obama’s birth certificate not be handled any differently, yet we see a government employee doing just that and breaking the law.  Why now, after months of legal filings has she decided to come forward to admit that she has seen That One’s birth certificate?  When did she see it?  Under who’s authority did she act?  Why is spokesperson Janice Okubo claiming to have knowledge of what Obama’s birth certificate looks like.  If Okubo, a lowly employee got a glimpse of Obama’s birth certificate, at the very least there must be others who may also attest to its content. 

Perhaps Obama should sue in the state of Hawaii since it is obvious that a crime was committed against him by Hawaii’s own Health Department in releasing an opinion, opening a sealed document, and blatantly violating Obama’s own right to privacy.  Had the Hawaii Health Department claimed that Obama was in fact born some where else than Hawaii, the outcome would have serious repercussions on the election and immediate actions would be taken, most certainly in a court of law.  I do not believe that any Court in the land would accept testimony in place of the presentation of an actual document which is easily accessible to an expert witness.  Obama, before he became a politician was a graduate of the Harvard School of Law, and would certainly have never accepted a statement from an expert witness when there is documentation available.

Further implications and a nice write up of her statements are made at http://michaelpatrickleahy.blogspot.com/2008/10/show-us-birth-certificate-hawaii.html

Until Obama himself releases the authentic, vaulted birth certificate, this will not go away, nor should it.  The debate rages on as to who has standing to enforce the rules of eligibility, and in an effort to protect anyone from taking the Office of The President of The United States who is not a citizen, we the people need to see our nominees birth certificates and not take just take someone’s word for it.

America needs to move past this and Obama needs to once and for all release his own birth certificate.  While Obama is in full disclosure mode, he should at the very least make a statement about the dinner he attended for Khalidi with his wife and William Ayers.  

If I were to make public these tapes, containing blunt and candid remarks on many different subjects, the confidentiality of the office of the president would always be suspect.
Richard M. Nixon

Read Full Post »

In the matter of Berg vs Obama, questioning Obama’s citizenship and eligibility to be President, Berg has appealed all the way to the Supreme Court and we are awaiting a ruling which may take until hell freezes over.  None the less, no facts were ruled valid or invalid as they have not been heard. In all these filings the FEC – Federal Election Committee is named along with Obama and rightfully so the FEC made a special filing to the Court requesting relief from the claim since the dismissal of the case not apparently mention them specifically from being dismissed. 

DEFENDANT FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION’S MOTION TO DISMISS FOR LACK OF SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 12(b)(1)

Defendant Federal Election Commission (“FEC” or “Commission”) moves to dismiss the Complaint in this matter pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1) for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Plaintiff’s Complaint does not present an Article III case or controversy because plaintiff lacks standing to raise the issue of a candidate’s constitutional eligibility. Moreover, even if Berg had standing to raise the constitutional eligibility issue, the Commission should be dismissed as a party to this case because it has no oversight over the Constitution’s Presidential Qualifications Clause.

 

The FEC claims it has no oversight in the Constitutions Presidential Election Qualifications clause. 

WHAT, NO OVERSIGHT?  Go and read the brief the FEC filed for yourself and see that the FEC is not in charge of eligibility.  Who the frig is in charge of election qualifications? 

The history of the Berg filings.  http://dockets.justia.com/docket/court-paedce/case_no-2:2008cv04083/case_id-281573/

http://obamacrimes.com/index.php/component/content/article/2-news/49-press-release-10-30-2008-berg-filing-injunction-to-stay-presidential-election

Incidentally Judge Surrick on  wrote “AND NOW, this 27th day of October, 2008, having dismissed Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief, it is ORDERED that all pending motions are DISMISSED as moot. IT IS SO ORDERED.BY THE COURT:/s/ R. Barclay Surrick, Judge.

According to Mr Berg, he has filed two documents:

  1. Application for an Immediate Injunction to Stay the Presidential Election of November 4, 2008; and
  2. Petition for Writ of Certiorari. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Certiorari

 

http://www.fec.gov/ If the Federal Government can’t policy itself to have over sight in Federal Elections, who does?

Read Full Post »

I am convinced that Barry Baraq Mohammed Hussein Dunham Sottero Obama Jr., is not a natural born citizen as required by the U.S. Constitution to be President.  If Obama wins the election as most polls predict, Obama will be an Unconstitutional President the second he raises his right hand to God or Allah and takes the Presidential Oath of Office.

In the opinion of groups like Family Security Matters, “unless Obama can produce an authentic birth certificate proving that he is a “natural born citizen,” then every Democrat member of Congress, every person managing Obama’s campaign, every officer and director of the Democrat National Committee, and every person who has ever taken an oath to “support and defend” the Constitution and is now supporting an Unconstitutional candidate for president, has participated in a vast left-wing conspiracy to defraud millions of Democrats out of hundreds of millions of dollars to elect an Unconstitutional President.” http://familysecuritymatters.org/docLib/20080805_VoterGuide_Aug_4_2008CATOKvf1.pdf

In concealing the whereabouts of his birth, Obama so far has succeeded in dodging the most fundamental requirement of eligibility as President.  Numerous legal proceeding have been filed against Obama to provide proof of his citizenship but most cases have been quick in responding with motions to dismiss further allowing That One to continue to perpetrate fraud on the American people.  Berg vs Obama was dismissed by the US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania last week, for lack of standing, he has appealed to the Supreme Court. No facts were ruled valid or invalid as they have not been heard.  Berg and all citizens of The USA must query the authority of Judge Surrick’s District Court’s decision and the eligibility of Obama’s citizenship.  Berg commented:

“This is a question of who has standing to uphold our Constitution. If I don’t have standing, if you don’t have standing, if your neighbor doesn’t have standing to question the eligibility of an individual to be President of the United States – the Commander-in-Chief, the most powerful person in the world – then who does?”

Summarily, “Berg’s suit sought to present evidence that Obama may have been born in Kenya, where under the law at the time, his mother (a U.S. citizen) would have had to have been 19 years old to have conferred her citizenship to him.  (Obama ACKNOWLEDGES dual citizenship with Kenya on his website https://donate.barackobama.com/page/contribute/splashmagnet_octexp).  Berg also sought to produce evidence that Obama later held Indonesian citizenship when he was adopted by Lolo Soetoro and moved with him to Indonesia.  Indonesia and the U.S. did not recognize dual citizenship at the time, so the only valid citizenship he would have held in that case is Indonesian.  He would have expatriated any U.S. or other citizenship held.”  http://www.chronwatch-america.com/articles/3830/1/Berg-vs-Obama-Headed-for-Supreme-Court/Page1.html  Even if he subsequently regained U.S. citizenship, it would be thru naturalization, which is expressly ineligible to serve as President of the United States under Article II of the Constitution! 

Berg v. Obama No. 08-cv-04083. can be followed here. 


 http://dockets.justia.com/docket/court-paedce/case_no-2:2008cv04083/case_id-281573/

 http://www.supremecourtus.gov/ http://www.scotuswiki.com/index.php?title=Main_Page 

http://obamacrimes.com/index.php/component/content/article/2-news/49-press-release-10-30-2008-berg-filing-injunction-to-stay-presidential-election further explains his appeal to the Supreme Court here. 

The Supreme Court is a busy place and .  But remember: On November 4, we vote for electors, who then vote on December 15 for the President.
Technically, there’s still time, though time is of the essence.  The Electoral College consists of 538 popularly elected representatives who formally select the President and Vice President.  In 2008, it will make the selection on December 15.  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electoral_College_(United_States). 

Perhaps the October Surprise will come in time for Christmas.

Thy will be done, let justice be served

Read Full Post »

http://www.americanthinker.com/2008/10/who_enforces_the_constitutions.html asks who enforces the Constitution’s Natural Born Citizen Clause?  Apparently it isn’t you or I that enforce the Constitution.  We only foot the bill with our taxes to those duly elected, to protect and serve, “We the people. 

Worth the read , excerpted . 

“The 10th Amendment to the Constitution states that the powers not delegated to the federal government, nor prohibited to the states, remain with the states or the people.  Therefore it seems that any state or any person has standing to sue to enforce not just the Natural Born Citizen Clause, but other constitutional requirements and rights, absent some expressly written bar within the Constitution itself.”

Judge Surrick did not agree in Berg vs Obama, which undoubtedly will be refiled.

Read Full Post »

Is it possible that Americans really want Socialism? 

All rhetoric aside, the Obama’s campaign is positioning itself at warp speed to put rhetoric into action and on an unprecedented level.  Senator Obama is ranked the most liberal member of the Senate by the National Journal and he intends to keep everyone of his liberal campaign promises with the familiar bell of spreading the wealth around ringing in the background like jungle bells on Santa’s sled.

I don’t believe in Santa any more and I don’t want to believe that Americans think the policies of Obama will enhance the economy.  All of the election polls indicate America is ready for socialism and are standing in line to vote for That One, Obama. 

http://4hillary.wordpress.com/the-audacity-of-socialism-ibd-exclusive-series/  Examine Senator Obama’s past, his voting record and the people who’ve served as his advisers and mentors over the years. We’ll show how the facts of Obama’s actions and associations reveal a far more left-leaning tilt to his background — and to his politics. 

It is hard to resist the need for change based on our current financial crisis but to think that Obama is going to give economic justice to some of the people who are the drain of our society is infuriating.  America is not the land of entitlement, you are entitled to little- except opportunity.  Not without sensitivity to people in actual need of entitlement programs, they need to be overhauled to enable people to become productive members of society and not just welfare recipients for life.  Immigrants daily flock across our borders seeking opportunity.  Some immigrants take advantage of free government programs designed for American citizens and yet many find success going on to become US tax paying, law abiding, citizens. 

The idea that ‘we’ll take care of you’ is vomitous and totally infuriating to the American way of life.  The virtue of hard work has improved a whole lot of lives.  Work hard, go to school, get a job, save, start your own business, pay taxes, hire other people, make the economy strong, go to church, and help others when in need and live out the American Dream as you see fit.   The American Dream should never be sitting on your ass collecting a welfare check for years and years waiting for social security to kick in.  

It used to be you were embarrassed if you got a welfare check or had to buy groceries with food stamps, now I see big signs in the front of stores accepting food stamps.    Right next to the signs for “We Accept Food Stamps” are the signs that say “Obama 08”; there’s Obama justice after all.

Read Full Post »

Obama running mate Joe Biden is sounding the alarm bells that we are going to have an international crisis.  “Mark my words,” the Democratic vice presidential nominee warned at the second of his two Seattle fundraisers Sunday. “It will not be six months before the world tests Barack Obama like they did John Kennedy. The world is looking. We’re about to elect a brilliant 47-year-old senator president of the United States of America. Remember I said it standing here if you don’t remember anything else I said. Watch, we’re gonna have an international crisis, a generated crisis, to test the mettle of this guy. I can give you at least four or five scenarios from where it might originate,” Biden said to Emerald City supporters, mentioning the Middle East and Russia as possibilities. 

What is apparent, is that Obama is unprepared and untested to defend or respond to any kind of threat to America.  We are reminded at http://www.americanthinker.com/2008/10/time_for_a_gut_check_america.html 

“If Obama is elected, the Democrats will have not only the Presidency, but almost certainly massive, veto-proof majorities in both Houses of Congress as well. They will be able to do anything they want. Absolutely anything. Are you comfortable with that, America? Do you know and trust Barack Obama well enough to give him power on a level never before possessed by any previous US President?”

Project a world-wide image of timidity and self-doubt that will only encourage our enemies, as Joe Biden said, to “test” our weak president, thereby increasing the probability of  attacks on America and our allies, all of which makes war more, not less, likely under an Obama  Presidency.

Aside from changing everything from abortion laws, marriage laws for homosexuals, to tax laws in a socialist redistribution of wealth, an Obama Presidency is going to increase the probability of attacks on America.  It won’t matter what legislation Obama enacts if our country is burning in the face of terrorism on US Soil.  Dead people can not vote nor do they care much about paying taxes- except for the death tax which under Obama will be collected.  Survivors of dead Americans will be the ones left questioning Obama just as they questioned President Clinton’s actions in how 9-11 could have been prevented.

Only one year ago, October 27, 2007- “At a White House press conference last week, just in case you haven’t heard, Presidnet Bush informed the American people that he had told world leaders “if you’re interested in avoiding World War III, it seems like you ought to be interested in preventing [Iran] from having the knowledge necessary to make a nuclear weapon.” World War III.  Pundits have raised their eyebrows and comics are busy writing jokes, but the president’s reference to Armageddon, no matter how cavalierly uttered and subsequently brushed away, suggests an alarming context.” http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/20071022_on_the_eve_of_destruction/ 

No matter your support of the Bush doctrine, no large scale terrorist act has been committed inside the borders of America under his administration since September 11.

Americans need to come to grip that threat levels remains extremely high. October 28, 2008 – The United States government’s national threat level is Elevated, or Yellow. For all domestic and international flights, the U.S. threat level is High, or Orange. http://www.dhs.gov/xinfoshare/programs/Copy_of_press_release_0046.shtm

Many Americans can not fathom the destruction that terrorist would like to carry out, nor comprehend a massive loss of life.  The Pentagon requested an assessment of risk by a group called Forecasting International and it becomes clear we need to be wary.

This analysis of several possible prime targets of terrorism is based on a new study that Cetron’s Forecasting International carried out for the Pentagon. None of this information is classified. Although the oft-mentioned threat of a “suitcase” nuclear weapon or a dirty bomb has been discussed widely, and is a possibility, the consequences of attacking lesser, non-nuclear threats can be dire. Members of the armed forces, the CIA, the FBI, the National Security Agency, and many other agencies agree that the question isn’t whether America will be attacked on its own soil again. It’s only a question of when.

The Report outlines outlines in chilling details ten different scenarios that would wreak financial and psychological havoc in the United States.  http://newsmax.com/newsfront/targets_of_terrorism/2008/09/10/129637.html

While not predictive in nature, the report outlines scenarios like an attack on US oil refineries, bringing down high tension wires, coordinated shootings at major tourist destinations, destroy the Tennessee Valley Authority Dams, to detonating EMP (electromagnetic pulse) bombs to destroy the INTERNET. 

The Implications are clear from this study and in the very words of Biden, we are at risk. Do you know and trust Barry Baraq Mohammad Hussein Dunham Sottero Obama?  Do you know and trust him with total control of the United States of America?  The potential for threat requires a candidate with the skills necessary to keep our nation secure.  America needs John McCain now more than ever.  The World needs John McCain.

Read Full Post »

In a 2001 Chicago Public Radio Interview Obama is discussing the best way to bring about a Redistribution of Wealth.  The interview reiterates what Obama has been said to Joe The Plumber regarding his plans to “Spread the wealth around.”  Obama believes that it’s a tragedy the Constitution wasn’t radically reinterpreted to force redistribution of wealth for African Americans, he said in the interview  “…  But the Supreme Court never ventured into the issues of redistribution of wealth, and more basic issues of political and economic justice in this society.” 

For Obama, the redistribution of wealth is a civil right that the civil rights movement failed to attain. http://newsbusters.org/blogs/p-j-gladnick/2008/10/27/will-msm-continue-ignoring-shocking-obama-redistribution-wealth-audio “To Barack Obama, the redistribution of wealth is basic “political and economic justice,” and one segment of society has the basic right to the money of other segments of society. He’s very straight forward about this.”

Whoa there, Mr. Barry Baraq Mohammad Hussein Dunham Sottero Obama Jr., That One, whatever your name is- hold your horses.  http://www.findlaw.com/casecode/constitution/ The Constitution, while not perfect has done a pretty good job of protecting its citizens.  In Federal Court only last week, The Constitution prevented Berg vs Obama from having to produce a valid, certified birth certificate as proof of eligibility for the Presidency.  and not just a certificate of live birth( COLB).  Obama bill make every effort politically and legislatively to create a just society of socialism and create a Constitutional Crisis 

Will a President Obama go after the Declaration of Independence next in an effort to take money from the rich and give it to the poor?   We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.  Americans and immigrants alike have the opportunity for the pursuit of life, liberty and justice in the United States, I read no where that anyone is guaranteed anything.

We all – and I do mean all, even those receiving welfare, must realize that the “redistribution of wealth” doesn’t bring more opportunities for Americans-  it just enhances the welfare system.   Yes, there are people who need welfare and some may qualify for life but to expect the government to provide housing and money to live for persons who are capable of working is not only ludicrous, is socialist.

America is in need of job opportunities and not welfare handouts that can go on for years and years.  Companies that pay larger taxes will reduce salaries, reduce employment levels, and raise prices to increase profits.  Obama’s plans for redistribution are going to continue to erode our economic stability here in The United States and abroad.  President Jimmy Carter tried these kind of tactics, and it took years for America to rebound from his policies that in part allowed for Russia’s empire to expand beyond its borders, and support countries like Iran who we are once again challenged by. 

Hmmmmm, WordPress for some reason is not allowing Achrcanum to upload the video featuring Obama, probably too many hits – half a million in one day.  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iivL4c_3pck  Make it half a million plus one,- you.

Read Full Post »

TO ALL MY FRIENDS….LIBERAL OR CONSERVATIVE……..FYI?
 
A little over one year ago:
1) Consumer confidence stood at a 2 1/2 year high?
2) Regular gasoline sold for $2.19 a gallon?
3) Unemployment rate was 4.5%.?
4) the DOW JONES hit a record high–14,000 +?
5) American’s were buying new cars, taking cruises,
    vacations overseas, living large!…
 
But American’s wanted ‘CHANGE’!? So, in 2006 they voted in a
Democratic Congress and yes–we got ‘CHANGE’ all right. In the PAST
YEAR:?
 
1) Consumer confidence has plummeted?
2) Gasoline is now over $4 a gallon & climbing!?
3) Unemployment is up to 5.5% (a 10% increase);
4) Americans have seen their home equity drop by $12 TRILLION
5) DOLLARS and prices still dropping?
6) 1% of American homes are in foreclosure.
7) as I write, THE DOW is lower?
 
* $2.5 TRILLION DOLLARS HAS EVAPORATED FROM THEIR
STOCKS, BONDS & MUTUAL FUNDS INVESTMENT PORTFOLIOS!
 
* YES, IN 2006 AMERICA VOTED FOR CHANGE…AND WE SURE?GOT IT!? ….
 
* AND WHAT HAS CONGRESS DONE IN THE LAST TWO YEARS, ABSOLUTELY NOTHING.
 
NOW THE DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATE FOR PRESIDENT CLAIMS HE IS GOING TO
REALLY GIVE US CHANGE ALONG WITH A DEMOCRATIC CONGRESS!!!!
 
JUST HOW MUCH MORE ‘CHANGE’ DO YOU THINK YOU CAN STAND?
If you visit Bear Tracks be sure to read why Huntley Brown can not for for Obama.  http://beartracks.wordpress.com/2008/10/14/why-i-cant-vote-for-obama-huntley-brown-truth/
I couldn’t have said it any better.  Fast forward a few weeks and here we are in the worst economic session ever with bailouts of companies and banks plus the government taking ownership of banks.  This action beats digging a deeper hole but it sucks none-the-less.  Had our Democratic elected officials like Hussein Obama managed to enforce or enact legislation to prevent this we’d be a little wealthier and our economic system healthier.  Where was laissez-faire Pelosi during all of this? Blaming Bush no doubt, even when her own party was in control of the Senate.
“Ask yourselves why you came here and vote with courage and integrity to those principles. If, like me, you came here because you believe in limited government and the freedom of the American marketplace, I urge you vote in accordance with your convictions,” Rep. Mike Pence, R-Indiana, said regarding the bailout on http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/09/29/bailout.fallout/index.html
Take that same quote and apply it to “Who are you going to vote for the Presidency?”  Obama and his obamanomics are an Obamination to freedoms in America. 
Vote for McCain and Mama; NOT OBAMA.

Read Full Post »

Take 2 minutes of your time to see Obama telling community organizers how they will shape his presidency, MY COUNTRY-even before his inaguration:

 

“Before I even get inaugurated, during the transition we are going to be calling all of you in to help us shape the agenda. We’re going to be having meetings all across the country with community organizations so that you have input into the agenda for the next presidency of the United States of America.”

Take this agenda and choke on an Acorn.  Chew it up and spit out socialism while your at it.

Read Full Post »

%d bloggers like this: