Tenacious: 1 a: not easily pulled apart : cohesive<a tenacious metal> b: tending to adhere or cling especially to another substance <tenacious burs>2 a: persistent in maintaining, adhering to, or seeking something valued or desired <a tenacious advocate of civil rights> <tenacious negotiators> b: retentive <a tenacious memory> . Webster.
Tenacious is Phil Berg. Whatever one’s opinion of Berg, he is still at the doors of The Supreme Court looking for answers regarding President Obama’s natural born citizenship issues which remain unresolved to some, even after the inauguration.
As Obama can attest to-if at first you don’t succeed, try again in the statement of The Oath of Office, Berg keeps trying again and again at The Supreme Court to find out the truth in Obama’s genealogy that would prove or disprove his eligibility to hold the Office of Presidency.
Perhaps it is just protocol or maybe the merits of the case will be considered prior to their being a judgment made, but The Free Republic http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2177262/posts posting from PACER shows-02/02/2009 Open Document CLERK ORDER referring the Response of Appellant to Appellee Federal Election Committee’s Motion for Summary Affirmance to the merits panel, filed. SEND TO MERITS PANEL. (CH) [emphasis from posting]
Berg’s case is still alive-barely.
http://wthrockmorton.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/joyce_anderson-amicus-final.pdf for docket No. 08-570 Berg v Obama
If all other actions fall through, apparently Philip Berg plans on filing a Petition for Writ of Quo Warranto (be sure to read the linked wikipedia article) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quo_warranto], challenging qualifications for President.
Props to the Right Side of Life who keeps track of all the legal filings regarding Obama’s citizenship. http://www.therightsideoflife.com/?page_id=1518 and here http://www.therightsideoflife.com/?p=3371
Tenacious indeed, Mr. Berg.
Ahrcanum. Latin origin Arcanus. Mysterious, having special knowledge, information accessible or possesed only by the initiate. Secrets revealed.
Ahrcanum 
THANK YOU JESSE, WE THE PEOPLE will always endure until Barry Sorreto who went to college under a forien student scholar-ship is found guilty!
Jessemerrell@Comcast.net
March 14, 2009
Judge James Robertson
U.S. District Judicial Jackass Center
333 Constitution (FORMERLY) Ave. NW
Washington, DC 20001
Dear Judicial Jackass Robertson:
Thank you for further flaunting your insufferable judicial arrogance, sending two U.S. marshals to threaten me yesterday after I called you to account for contemptuously throwing out a suit with clear Constitutional implications, challenging Obama’s “natural born” citizenship–simply because it didn’t suit your flagrantly prejudicial, anti-Constitutional opinions.
I told your Gestapo goons, of course, that unless the First Amendment had been repealed, or they were there to arrest me, that we had nothing to talk about.
One of your Brown-Shirt Nazi bullies, however, could not resist threatening me with some obscure law–one he didn’t know where it was, or when it was created–which he said made it a crime to say something that caused a federal judge “emotional distress.”
Emotional distress?
What unbelievably unadulterated horseshit!
What about the repulsive, stomach-turning ”emotional distress” you black-robed baboons speciously dish out to the American people daily–haughtily spitting on our precious Constitution with your nauseating, decency-stomping, judicial-jackass slobber!
What do we do about black-hearted bastards who swear a solemn oath to defend the Constitution–then stomp a shortcut through it like snooty, jackbooted Gestapo thugs?
But since your Gestapo goon threatened me with Section 18, or whatever it was, I demand to know exactly what he was referring to. He sought to Nazi-Brown-Shirt browbeat me into submission to federal-judge tyranny, quoting some law, so I want to know what it is–even though the Constitution clearly trumps it!
I asked him what it was, and where, but he said he didn’t know. But he didn’t mind threatening me with this ambiguous bullshit.
If it is illegal for a Constitution-loving citizen to chastise a Constitution-scorning judge, who has spitefully spat on America’s consecrated moral bedrock, then the slimy, steel-laden tentacles of unspeakable tyranny are already wrapped tightly around helpless citizens–awaiting the final hideous strangulation.
But not as long as one end of my red-blooded tongue is loose!
I told your Gestapo gangster that I said nothing in my letter to you that I hadn’t said to federal judges and other high muckity-mucks for 30 years or more.
He then said something even more detestable: “Not to a federal judge in Washington.”
Oh, I see: The Holy Shroud of Washington sanctimoniously bestows Caesar-like totalitarianism on Judicial Jackasses in Washington, especially smug assholes like you who can’t read the Constitution!
The Constitution clearly states, with no possible ambiguity–in Article 2, Section 1–that “No person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President.”
Even an uneducated ditch-digger could understand that.
But not fart-face, weasel-word, high-handed, dictatorial federal judges.
No, something as clear as liquid crystal is fuzzy to you despicable orangutans.
But a vague exaggeration, you foolishly grasp as if it were clear as glass.
When I said you “ought to have your grubby nuts cut out and shoved up your mangy ass till you choke on them,” you took that obvious overstatement–plainly intended to show how much black-robed bastards like you upset people who still believe in the Constitution’s plain words–as a threat to your safety.
Your Brown-Shirt lackey even asked me if I had owned a gun–implying, of course, that if I did I might pose a threat to your safety.
The idiocy of that spurious illogic is really too preposterous for serious comment. Since I said you “ought” to have your nuts cut out, not that I was going to do it, or had any intention of doing it; I wouldn’t dirty my hands on a filthy asshole like you–he should have asked if I owned a knife, instead of a gun. But maybe he doesn’t know the difference between a knife and a gun–he just knows how to tyrannically threaten law-abiding, Constitution-believing, hard-working, taxpaying Americans. He knows that very well!
And I must tell you I bitterly resent my hard-earned tax dollars being wasted by a mangy-ass son-of-a-bitch like you sending obnoxious U.S. marshals to invade my home and threaten me–all because I used my clear, First Amendment Constitutional rights to call you to account for shamefully abusing the Constitution.
America is going down the drain–economically and Constitutionally, with terrorists and illegal aliens pouring across our borders like invading armies practically unopposed–but our insufferable, over-bloated, dictatorial government, while turning a blind eye to all that, has time and money to send two high-paid federal marshals–probably $130,000.00 each–to harass a citizen daring to exercise his precious First Amendment rights, which you want to destroy.
Maybe that’s part of Fuhrer Obama’s “Stimulus Package” at work!
One of your insulting assholes, seeking to bully and silence me, even tried to use the old “guilt by association” technique, and asked me if I knew the lawyer who brought the suit–as if I did, that might make me more guilty!
I don’t know the lawyer–but I’m damn sure going to try and find out now! Maybe he can use this letter in his appeal, showing the hanky-panky clearly evident in your actions.
Your menacing marshal then spoke of “what the judge was saying,” as if he had gotten his talking points from you before coming–or perhaps from the Fuhrer’s lawyers, since I read where they were scornfully demanding sanctions against any lawyer who dared be picky enough to bring up the Constitution while challenging Obama.
And, as if robotically dancing to the Pied Piper’s tune, you are calling for sanctions!
Your marshal also told me how awfully illegal it was to give “emotional distress” to a federal judge, implying you might fear for your safety.
Maybe you ought to be afraid of what you have done.
That might even be good for a repulsive bastard like you.
When you solemnly swear to uphold and defend the Constitution–then loathsomely lacerate and despicably desecrate that hallowed document–perhaps you should fear for your safety, for you have stopped being a dutiful servant of the people, and started arrogating unto yourself the venomous trappings of their tyrannical slave-master.
If you do have an occasional fear, maybe that’s a good thing!
You might even realize you are not a despotic dictator who can intimidate with impunity, but are lawfully bound by Constitutional restraints.
Foremost of those restraints, you hideous asshole, is this: “We the People!”
We the People!
Not “we the arrogant, dictatorial federal judges,” who think they can spit on the Constitution, and trample Constitution-believing citizens under their despotic, jackbooted, totalitarian mockery of the Constitution.
It’s as if Thomas Jefferson saw tyrants like you coming when he warned us in his “Notes on Virginia” in 1782, that the very purpose of a written Constitution is to “bind up the several branches of government by certain laws, which, when they transgress, their acts shall become nullities!”
And if that were not enough, he went on to say that the written Constitution would render unnecessary an appeal to the people, or in other words a rebellion, on every infraction of their rights, on the peril that their acquiescence shall be construed into an intention to surrender those rights.”
I, for one–and there are millions like me, you swollen baboon–don’t intend to surrender any of our Constitutional rights!
I inherited that belief by blood!
Very precious blood!
Indeed, my fourth-great-grandfather was hanged by the British Royal Governor of North Carolina in 1771 for protesting high and unjust British taxes.
Oh, and my ancestor, Captain Benjamin Merrell, wasn’t just hanged–but hanged, drawn and quartered: which means he was hanged, but taken down while yet alive, his abdomen violently sliced open and his entrails cruelly cut out and brutally thrown in his face and set afire…and then his body barbarically slashed into four quarters.
So, naturally, I’m more than a little suspicious of dictatorial power such as you brandish.
And I’m not alone.
“In questions of power,” thundered Jefferson in his famous Kentucky Resolution of 1798, “let no more be heard of confidence in man, but bind him down from mischief by the chains of the Constitution.”
You have broken those protective chains–and want to capriciously bind us with them!
The trouble with you arrogant assholes is that you have haughtily preened and scandalously postured in your bullshit-sanctified, counterfeit chambers of justice for so long that you think you are immune to public criticism, inoculated against citizen indignation.
Whenever I hear a supercilious bastard like you, moralizing with such extreme unction, I wish thousands of equally outraged citizens could march into your grubby courtroom and throw a roll of toilet paper into your shitass face, to show you that you are just as mortal as we are, and not the god you think you are.
Try reading the Constitution once in a while, instead of your own puffed-up, haughty, horseshit opinions.
You will find it begins: “We the People!”
We The People!
Notice, it didn’t begin “We the arrogant federal judges, who will ignore the Constitution and tell the contemptible peasants what rights they have–and then threaten the puny peons if they don’t grovel before our high and mighty benches, and sycophantically kiss our dishonorable, authoritarian boots…”
The Founding Fathers, obviously alien to leftist-liberal idiots like you, also said something else worth noting, in another document foreign to you. It said that the American people have “unalienable Rights” that are to be guaranteed by governments–not that governments could snatch them away if they wished, and terrorize anybody who dared assert his sacred rights to a domineering federal judge.
Governments–including black-robed bastards like you–derive what powers they have ONLY FROM “the consent of the governed,” this odd document said.
Even more bizarre, this treasonous document declared that when any government “becomes destructive of these ends”–that is to secure the rights of the people from despots such as you and your ilk–“it is the right of the people to alter or to abolish it.”
Did you hear that?
IT IS THE “RIGHT OF THE PEOPLE” TO “ALTER OR TO ABOLISH” AN AUTHORITARIAN GOVERNMENT, WHEN IT PREYS UPON OUR LIBERTIES, AND IT IS OUR GOD-GIVEN RIGHT TO FORM A NEW GOVERNMENT!
You ought to read that little-known, sacred–to We the People anyway–document once in a while.
It has this curious title: “The Declaration of Independence.”
Until you do read it–and start acknowledging it and the Constitution–instead of your own scornful opinions–you are still as near nothing as a cow turd is shit.
And you would still need to have your nuts cut out and shoved up your ass till you choke on them.
Further, if you can’t tell the difference the hyperbolic indignation of American citizens–and believe me, there are thousands of them out there, already starting “Tea Parties” against Big Government tyranny–then may God help America!
Because it’s obvious black-robed tyrants such as you won’t–or the Brown-Shirt goons you use to try and force your pompous whims upon a free people you would like to crush under your despotic boots!
Now Super-Disgustedly,
Jesse H. Merrell
CC: Eric Holder, Heinrich Himmler lackey for Heil Hitler Obama
Fuhrer Hussein Obama
Phil Berg hasn’t made any progress on any of the alleged cases. But he will gladly accept donations on his website. This is the same Phil Berg that tried to sue President Bush and Cheney for RICO and blamed Bush for the 911 attacks. I noticed he doesn’t pursue the 911 truther trash any more. Perhaps the “donations” stopped coming.
In then there’s this:
The Joint Chiefs of Staff HAVE AN ABSOLUTE CONSTITUTIONAL DUTY to stand behind Guantanamo Military Judge James Pohl UNTIL OBAMA OVERCOMES “RES IPSA LOQUITUR” BY SUPPLYING HIS LONG FORM BIRTH CERTIFICATE AND PROVING HIS ELIGIBILITY TO BE PRESIDENT UNDER ARTICLE 2 OF THE US CONSTITUTION.
We need people like Mr. Berg to fight for our rights.