Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Posts Tagged ‘U.S. v Prudden’

Obama Lawsuits Pending at Supreme Court

“So how many Americans does it take to verify the birth status of POTUS-Elect Barrack Obama?

The world may never know! ”

(Sorry Tootsie Pop but I have always loved that commercial with the little owl) 
http://readmylipstickprint.blogspot.com/2008/11/asleep-at-wheel.html 

Is it Constitutional Law or Common Law that dictates the qualification of a natural born citizen and eligibility to hold the office of President?  I don’t think the Supreme Court is certain who has standing in seeking out the true citizenship and authentic birth certificate of President Elect Obama.  SCOTUS will be gathering in conference this Friday, December 5, 2008 to find out.  The Supreme Court judges will hopefully not deviate from their responsibility, which is the strict interpretation of written law.  I hope they will allow both the Berg and Donofrio cases to proceed against the grain of popularity, and with the scale of justice.

Leo C Donofrio, SCOTUS Docket No. 08A407, Donofrio v. Wells, and recently Cort Wrotnowski, (SCOTUS Docket No. 08A469 lay in wait for review or dismissal at SCOTUS.  Berg hasn’t gone anywhere for the moment- from his SCOTUS appeal,

“Judge Surrick claimed
the DNC’s promises were not actually promises but
instead of statement of intentions. Judge Surrick
went on further claiming, “The ‘promises’ that
Petitioner identifies arc statements of principle and
intent in the political realm. They are not enforceable
promises under contract law. Indeed, our political
system could not function if every political message
articulated by a campaign could be characterized as
a legally binding contact enforceable by individual
voters. Of course, voters are free to vote out of office
those politicians seen to have breached campaign
promises and Federal courts, however, are not and
31
cannot be in the business of enforcing political
rhetoric.”

Ain’t that a kick in the pants?  It all goes back to the fact that if Philip J. Berg, American citizen, and former attorney general of Pennsylvania doesn’t have the “standing” to bring this type of lawsuit against Obama, then who in America does have standing? How is it that the lower court has decided that a citizen can not enforce there own Constitution in a court of law?

What the Judge missed is that Berg wasn’t challenging political rhetoric at all, he was and is, challenging Constitutional and Common Law that dictates who is eligible.  Berg’s filing to SCOTUS can be found here- http://www.sectalk.com/boards/showthread.php?t=62655&referrerid=1579

At the very least one hopes Berg’s case gets remanded back to the lower court who created this grave error in its ruling and at the very best scenario, The Supreme Court agrees to hear the case.

More filings are pouring in to lower and federal court to get to the bottom of Obama’s eligibility with Darrel Reese Hunter of Texas,  who ran as a Democratic Presidential nominee http://www.ontheissues.org/senate/Darrel_Hunter.htm.   According to his financial records he didn’t have much success in fund raising, garnering merely $200 in support of himself.  http://query.nictusa.com/cgi-bin/can_detail/P40003022/ . Daniel John Essek has also filed a demand that Obama provide a copy of his birth certificate.  http://www.essek4senate.org/ 

Essek and Hunter have put themselves out there for scrutiny, whatever there motives.  They as citizens, voters and wanna be elected officials, are pursuing fair competition for a fair election.  In all fairness to Obama, I haven’t seen their birth certificates either, but I’d bet they show you theirs if you showed them yours.  Don’t forget about Alan Keyes, former Reagan administration official, Ambassador and presidential candidate was among petitioners who filed an action last Thursday in the Superior Court of California seeking a court order enjoining Barack Obama’s California Electors from signing the Certificate of Vote until documentation showing the president-elect’s constitutional eligibility to serve as president is produced.  

 Keyes v Bowen, Superior Court, Sacramento, 34-2008-80000096-cu-wm-gds. Read it here

On other news from Hawaii http://www.earthfrisk.com/blog/?p=135#comment-7990  claims that none of HI hospitals have a record of birth for Obama.  In a most impressive compilation http://gto7.wordpress.com/2008/12/03/shocker-why-obama-will-not-be-president-in-january/ writes of the discrepancies in Hawaii law that may have allowed Obama and anyone else to obtain a Hawaiian birth certificate, even if he/she wasn’t born there. 

Shame, shame on Hawaii.  Is it still that easy to obtain a fraudulent birth certificate in Hawaii?  OMG- talk about a loophole in national security.   How can Governor Lingle in good conscious allow this to continue?  No wonder Andy Martin has been so persistent.  Here we have a government, capable of tracking our every move and it still issues documents to people born in foreign lands. 

“I’m a simple guy. Tell me what the rules are, apply those rules to everyone equally and I am a happy camper. However, if you tell me what the rules are, apply them to only some of us and throw them away when it suits you, I am not a happy camper.”

http://downwithjugears.blogspot.com/2008/12/supremes-get-obama-citizenship-hot.html 

Humph, I am not happy and I don’t think another lick on my Tootsie Roll Tootsie Pop is going to make a bit of difference.  Oh wait- isn’t Tootsie Roll HQ in Chicago?  Ah huh, another suspect in Obama’s circle of friends like Ayers and Rezko coming from Chicago.  I just bit into the tootsie roll part and lost a filling.  Go figure.

Read Full Post »

The birth certificate issue really isn’t about Obama, it is more about the law. 

Since not one single person in the whole word has ever seen President Elect Obama’s birth certificate, other than maybe him, one wonders if those pursuing his eligibility all the way to SCOTUS- The Supreme Court, have given thought that it is illegal to hire illegal aliens and that the Electoral College could be found in contempt by not verifying his birth certificate.  He may very well be just as illegal as his Auntie Zeituni in Boston. 

“Anyone employing or contracting with an illegal alien without verifying his work authorization status is guilty of a misdemeanor. Aliens and employers violating immigration laws are subject to arrest, detention, and seizure of their vehicles or property. In addition, individuals or entities who engage in racketeering enterprises that commit (or conspire to commit) immigration-related felonies are subject to private civil suits for treble damages and injunctive relief…..An employer has constructive knowledge that an employee is an illegal unauthorized worker if a reasonable person would infer it from the facts.”  http://www.fairus.org/site/PageServer?pagename=iic_immigrationissuecentersbcdd 

Couldn’t a reasonable person infer from the fact that he has hidden his birth certificate that he has hidden the truth and may not only be illegal, but unable to hold the Office of President? 

A lot of excellent workers are legal aliens and have green cards to allow them to get up ‘n go to work here in the land of the free home of the brave but not for the job of President.  Obama has never shown us his birth certificate.  He has already, admitted he had Kenyan citizenship on his website,  “Since Sen. Obama has neither renounced his U.S. citizenship nor sworn an oath of allegiance to Kenya, his Kenyan citizenship automatically expired on Aug. 4,1982.”  http://fightthesmears.com/articles/5/birthcertificate.   Whereby having had dual citizenship should have preempted him, it hasn’t so far, and perhaps then a natural born citizen means a “citizens of the United States at birth” as defined by U.S. Code, Title 8, Section 1401.  Maybe he is eligible, maybe he is not. 

Civilian Obama has said, “He did drugs at one point”  Pot and Cocaine being his choice. http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,240992,00.html Should the potential leader of the free world undergo random drug testing(s)?  Employers do it to employees all the time.   I kinda doubt Obama uses illegal substances, he still smokes cigarettes and should be allowed to light up a Marlboro whenever the heck he feel like it, better than a joint with his finger on a nuclear missile.  

“I believe what the country is looking for is someone who is open, honest and candid about themselves, said Robert Gibbs, Obama’s spokesman. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/01/02/AR2007010201359.html  Also citing the WaPo,Obama said,  “I got high [to] push questions of who I was out of my mind.”   Some twenty years later the question of who Obama is, still lingers.  Silence seems to be golden when it comes to his birth certificate.  In these matters, Obama for being a tall man, has fallen far short of being open, honest and candid.

There are a lot of lines left blank on his job application.  Where are his college transcripts that the rest of us are required to produce when applying for a job.  In order to enter the military you have to pass the physical, but our future Commander and Chief Obama, in his infinite wisdom, deferred to a one page document that said he is good health.

Not many immigration cases or failed drug tests get prosecuted or punished.  The punishment the U.S. Constitution will have gotten if Obama is found ineligible, would be a punishment that America should not have to bear.   

The Supreme Court has not decided to hear any matters regarding Obama’s citizenship or the election-yet. Friday, December 5, 2008 will be a big day for America and Leo Donofrio whose case has a conference before all nine Judges.  The most interesting thing to date about his case is that DONOFRIO V. WELLS was distributed for conference of December 5, 2008 by the entire Court after a prior referral of the application by Justice Thomas.

Donofrio has been updating his case against Wells SCOTUS Docket No. 08A407, Donofrio v. Wells and the Cort Wrotnowski, (SCOTUS Docket No. 08A469) on his site http://naturalborncitizen.wordpress.com/. At http://www.obamacrimes.com/ is the Berg v Obama et al filing but he’s been too busy to update with the deadline set by the Court of December 1, 2008 having passed.  Most certainly he is preparing more briefs to get a rapid resolution or at the very least, perhaps a stay in the Electoral College.  Best bet for Berg info is at –http://www.americasright.com/2008/12/berg-to-file-emergency-injunction-today.html

There is a great argument on whether the issue of his citizenship relies on the Constitutional Law or Common Law over at the Texas Darling Website and it you have a clear moment is certainly worth the read- In part, “The Common Law has always been conflicted on the subject of dual allegiance and naturalization, read Mackenzie and Cockburn. I never said it wasn’t. The Common Law has always allowed limitations, take a look at the various Acts of Succession, Union and Settlement. There is nothing in the natural-born citizen clause to make a Common Law lawyer blink for one second. “To all intents and purposes” is an outright acknowledgment that one is dealing with a fiction which may be ignored at will by the Common Law, it could as easily read “As if”. That is the source of my disagreement with Aleinikoff’s view. If I say, “I accept, to all intents and purposes, that John Doe is a citizen of the United States”, I am saying (a) that I do not know that he is, (b) that I do not believe that he is, or that I strongly doubt the proposition, and (c) that I will nonetheless act upon the supposition that he is until such time as the proposition is either proved or disproved. If you apply English Common Law, as it stands today, Obama would be eligible; if you apply Australian Common Law, as it stands today, he wouldn’t be; if you apply Canadian Common Law, as it stands today, his position would be in doubt. If you regard the US Constitution as a Common Law document he isn’t eligible under US Common Law. ”  http://texasdarlin.wordpress.com/2008/12/02/a-reply-to-donofrio/#more-5277  and beats the whole issue with a stick very eloquently here http://texasdarlin.wordpress.com/2008/11/28/natural-born-citizens-or-how-to-beat-a-subject-to-death-with-a-stick/ .

http://aconservativeedge.wordpress.com/2008/12/01/president-elect-barack-h-obama-your-long-form-birth-certificate-is-due-today-supreme-court-of-the-united-states/  Mr. Vieira cited a fraud ruling in a 1977 case called U.S. v. Prudden, which he feels applies in this case.
“Silence can only be equated with fraud when there is a legal and moral duty to speak or when an inquiry left unanswered would be intentionally misleading,” the ruling reads. “We cannot condone this shocking conduct … If that is the case we hope our message is clear. This sort of deception will not be tolerated and if this is routine it should be corrected immediately.” 

“The Republican Party of Lincoln has become the party of deceit, dissimulation, duplicity, and double-dealing. The party that claims a moral high ground is seemingly without morality when it comes to the seats of power – they will and have done anything and everything to discredit their opponents as they grapple for control.” http://amusedpen.wordpress.com/2008/12/02/a-vile-gop/ unloads on the GOP like there is no tomorrow and blames this citizenship mess on Republicans.  It misses the whole point that Obama should just take the moral high ground. 

You and I are his employer.  You and I pay his salary.  I want his birth certificate.  I want a President who qualifies under the U.S. Constitution.  I want the Supreme Court to Uphold the laws of the U.S. Constitution and Common Law.  Of course, I want to hit the mega zillion lottery.  Don’t you want it all too?

Read Full Post »