Of all the low down dirty deeds regarding Obama’s citizenship, I had forgotten all about Senate Resolution 511. Before Obama’s www.fightthesmears.com even began to address lurking questions on Obama’s illicit associations with Ayers, Retzko, Wright and the citizenship issue with Berg v Obama at the Supreme Court or Donofrio v Wells scheduled for a SCOTUS conference on December 5, 2008, was SR 511.
What started out as an effort to put to rest any objection to Senator John McCain’s eligibility to become our nation’s President because he was born outside of the U.S. in Panama, was in fact a preemptive strike to eliminate any claim that Obama might not be a natural born citizen either . A February NY Times article raised the question as to whether McCain, who was born in 1936 on a U.S. military installation in the Panama Canal Zone, satisfied the constitutional prerequisites to become president. Article II, Section 1 of the Constitution requires a president to be a natural born citizen.
“There are powerful arguments that Senator McCain or anyone else in this position is constitutionally qualified, but there is certainly no precedent,” Sarah H. Duggin, an associate professor of law at Catholic University who has studied the issue extensively, told the NYT. “It is not a slam-dunk situation.” http://blogs.wsj.com/law/2008/04/11/clinton-obama-agree-mccains-a-natural-born-citizen/.
SR 511 is Constitutional Resolution that got slam dunked when it passed in April of this year (08). Obama’s congressional supporters – including Gov. Claire McCaskill (D-MOi), Senator Patrick Leahy (D-VT), Sen. Barack Obama (D-IL) Sen. Tom Coburn (R-OK), Sen. Hillary Clinton (D-NY), and Sen. James Webb (D-VA) –proposed and passed a Resolution (S.Res.511) entitled: Recognizing that John Sidney McCain, III, is a natural born citizen. http://www.opencongress.org/bill/110-sr511/text.
S. Res.511 clearly states that “…Whereas the term `natural born Citizen’, as that term appears in Article II, Section 1, is not defined in the Constitution of the United States…”
Whereas, a natural born Citizen is not defined? Hold your horses there and re-read. Natural born citizen is not defined. Hmmmmmmm? The bill states, ” Whereas previous presidential candidates were born outside of the United States of America and were understood to be eligible to be President…” This piece of legislation was introduced, written and passed clearly with intent to extend the meaning of the Constitution, and prior to SR 511 there was no presidency in Congress.
Mrs. Clinton’s support and co-authorship of this bill, even though they were battling in the primary election for the presidency, was so incredibly strategic and manipulative on Obama’s part that it borders on absolute fraud. The bill completely attempts to redefine his citizenship and will try to keep him eligible, constitutionally as the 44th President, even after he finally shows his Official Vault Birth Certificate.
Do you honestly think Obama wants Hillary Clinton to act as his Secretary of State? Obama owes Hillary big time for sponsoring SR 511, and her nomination as SOS is payback. He will put up with her, and torture her until he can no longer stand it or she will, herself – resign from the position.
The Supreme Court may seek to grant Donofrio, Berg, and maybe even Keyes, a day in court and America may finally come to know the truth on Obama’s birth certificate. It has been alleged his birth is in Kenya, he lost his citizenship in Indonesia, his mother was a minor when she gave birth, his dad was Frank Marshall, he is an illegal alien, blah, blah, blah- according to SR 511- the Democrats would have us believe Constitution was tossed by the wayside and no matter.
Alas, in truth, “Simple resolutions do not require the approval of the other house nor the signature of the President, and they do not have the force of law.” http://www.senate.gov/legislative/common/briefing/leg_laws_acts.htm#4
Whether or not we are ever witness to his birth certificate, the facts are fuzzy and circumspect that Obama may not be qualified to hold any office in the United States. Would any elector who now votes for Obama may be found guilty of treason?
The Electoral College meets on December 15, 2008 to issue an official election determination. The members of Congress who have sworn to uphold the U.S. Constitution and its laws – including the citizenship clause, will vote in January to either confirm or reject the vote of the Electoral College but Electors are not bound to cast their vote for the candidate presented. “Faithless Electors” are members of the Electoral College who, for whatever reason do not vote for their party’s designated candidate. Since the founding of the Electoral College, there have been 156 faithless Electors. http://www.fairvote.org/e_college/faithless.htm Undoubtedly a faithless elector would run risk of censure and other political retaliation from his party. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Faithless_elector Can we depend on Joe Lieberman stand up again for what is right? What one member of Congress has enough balls to stand up to question that the basic constitutional requirements for office have been met? There is something totally wrong with relying on a Constitutional Crisis to satisfy our laws on eligibility. http://www.ziitrend.com/predict/on/any_faithless_elector_s_in_2008_2008-11-04 is where you can vote or following the voting on whether or not there will be a Constitutional Crisis at all. With 63% accuracy in the past, the current prediction is 70% favorable for a crisis.
Three is little doubt intelligence has been keeping a watchful eye court proceedings. Would there be peaceful noncompliance, civil disobedience, Martial Law?
This is not the change anyone had hoped for from Obama.
God Bless America.
Read Full Post »
Ahrcanum. Latin origin Arcanus. Mysterious, having special knowledge, information accessible or possesed only by the initiate. Secrets revealed.
Ahrcanum 
Obama’s Birth Certificate and Citizenship Goes to Conference at Supreme Court
Posted in Ahrcanum, Secrets, Lies, & Truth, tagged 08A407, 5TH Amendment, Ahrcanum, Al Qaeda, al-Zawahri, Andres Martin Tigona, Andy Martin, Andy Martin Lawsuit, Article 2, Article II Section 1, Barack Hussein Obama, Barry Baraq Mohammad Hussein Dunham Sotero Obama Jr, Berg Supreme Court, Berg v Obama, Berg vs Obama, birth certificate, CAIR, Campaign Finance, Certificate of Live Birth, certified long form birth certificate, Christmas Present, Christmas Surprise, citizen, citizenship, Citizenship Lawsuits, Clarence Thomas, Clinton, COLB, Constititutional Crisis, Constitution, contrarian commentary, David Souter, DNC, Docket 08-570, Donofrio, Donofrio v Wells, Donofrio vs Wells, Electoral College, eligibility, Eric Holder, fake birth certificate, Federal Compaint Berg vs Obama, Federal Election Commission, Fifth Amendment, Fox, Gregory Garre, Hawaii Birth Certificate, Joe Sandler, lack of standing, legal precedence, Leo Donofrio, Main Stream Media, Martin lawsuit, Martin vs Hawaii, natural born citizen, Natural Born Citizen Clause of the U.S. Constitution, New Jersey Lawsuit, Nina Mitchell Wells, Obama Birth Certificate, Obama's Birth Certificate, Obama's citizenship, Obama-gate, Obamagate, Philip Berg, Philip J. Berg, Politics, Presidential Affirmation, Presidential Election Qualification Clause, Presidential Eligibiltiy, SCOTUS, Scotus Docket No. 08-570, Solicitor General's Office, Supreme Court, Take the fifth, vaulted birth certificate, writ of certiorari, writ of mandamus · on November 20, 2008| Leave a Comment »
Justice is alive and well in this country. Leo Donofrio’s case that has been submitted to the U.S. Supreme Court regarding Obama’s citizenship has drawn the attention of Justice Clarence Thomas. The case has been “distributed for conference,” on December 5, 2008.
Donofrio argues that it is Secretary of State Wells of New Jersey job to verify eligibility for elections and uphold constitutional integrity. “She accepted the certifications of nomination from both major parties under the assumption that both candidate parties were eligible, but she did nothing to verify such eligibility.” The entire brief is good reading and dispels conspiracy theory and can be found at http://www.blogtext.org/userFiles/naturalborncitizen/ScotusStayAppBrief.doc
The United States Supreme Court scheduled the case – Leo C. Donofrio v. Nina Mitchell Wells, Secretary of State of the State of New Jersey – US Supreme Court Docket No. 08A407 – for a conference of the nine Justices. If four of the nine Justices vote to hear the case in full review, oral argument may be ordered. The conference is scheduled for December 5, 2008, ten days before the meeting of the Electoral College. The case originally sought, pre-election, to have the names of Barack Obama, John McCain, and Roger Calero removed from New Jersey ballots, and for a stay of the “national election” pending Supreme Court review of whether those candidates were eligible under the Constitution as natural born Citizens, as is required by Article 2, Section 1, Clause 5 of the Constitution of the United States. On Nov. 19, the case was docketed for full conference of all nine Justices and scheduled for December 5, 2008 http://www.blogtext.org/naturalborncitizen/
Republican Candidate John McCain was born in Panama, Roger Calero, Socialist Worker Party was born in Nicaragua, and Barack Obama has not provided proof to a court where he was born.
Phil Berg is a lawyer who has raised issue specifically with Obama’s birth certificate not being authentic and has filed numerous court proceedings in an effort to force Obama to produced it. http://dockets.justia.com/docket/court-paedce/case_no-2:2008cv04083/case_id-281573/ Taking his plea to the U.S. Supreme Court, a writ of certiorari was pending with a response due by December 1, 2008. A response to the court was issued by the FEC- Federal Elections Committee http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_R-l1iejogZw/SSR7kdEbCqI/AAAAAAAABmg/TD8yPv-ltZk/s1600-h/Berg+v+Obama+–+Waiver.bmp where the docket shows that the respondents have waived their right to respond, filed November 18, 2008. Ummm, so where is the response from the DNC and Obama himself who are also named in the suit? Should there even be a separate response? The writ extends to December 1, 2008 for a response and in the Berg case the FEC filed for relief separately and I believe separate responses are warranted in this case as well.
The FEC in Berg v Obama is outline here http://dockets.justia.com/docket/court-paedce/case_no-2:2008cv04083/case_id-281573/ specifically, The FEC claims it has no oversight in the Constitution’s Presidential Election Qualifications clause. http://docs.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/pennsylvania/paedce/2:2008cv04083/281573/28/ and the judge agreed dismissing the motion specifically against the FEC and all others.
http://www.americasright.com/2008/11/us-supreme-court-decisions-on-berg.html Outlines a look at possible collusion on the part of the FEC, DNC, and Obama, and notes specifically “FEC’s attorney, Gregory Garre, is with the Solicitor General’s office, and does not represent Obama or the DNC. While attorneys acting on behalf of a group of defendants or respondents is not necessarily rare, the difference here is the involvement of the Solicitor General’s office, a federal office.” How the Court and Berg interpret this, will more than likely impact the outcome of the case. I think it quite comical that the FEC distances itself from candidates at every turn unless there are Republican dollars at stake in choosing only to review McCain’s campaign finances, and not Obama’s .
Obama hired the Washington Law Firm Sandler, Reiff & Young to represent him against Berg. One of the lawyers filing the motion to dismiss was Joe Sandler who is also a legal representative for CAIR- Council for American Islamic Relations with reported terrorist ties. CAIR is suspect at best, for being funded by terrorists of Hamas thru the Holy Land Foundation. https://ahrcanum.wordpress.com/2008/10/20/sandler-vs-berg-for-obama-citizenship/ Obama in the long run may have rely on his newly appointed Attorney General, Eric Holder who is familiar with controversy from serving in the Clinton Administration. http://cbs2chicago.com/topstories/obama.eric.holder.2.867982.html
Where is the MSM, Main Stream Media in all of this? ABC, NBC, CBS, FOX, and CNN, are all ignoring the Supreme Court cases that challenge Obama’s eligibility and instead are focusing on his future cabinet picks assuming he is meets the qualifications, and focusing on Internet messages from Al Qaeda’s number-two commander, Ayman al–Zawahri that call Obama and Secretaries of State Colin Powell and Condoleezza Rice, “house negroes.” Venomous words to be sure, but it what would be equally venomous is to have a President in office that is not qualified based on his citizenship.
Obama can not continue to hide behind a COLB, Certification of Live Birth that remains unverifiable. http://fightthesmears.com/articles/5/birthcertificate or can he, if he pleads the fifth? https://ahrcanum.wordpress.com/2008/11/12/obama-could-plead-the-5th-amendment-on-citizenship/
God Bless America.
Share this:
Read Full Post »