Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Posts Tagged ‘Federal Compaint Berg vs Obama’

It has been certifiable madness that there are so many lawsuits in the courts in an effort to get Barack Obama to provide his “vault version” of his birth certificate in order to prove his eligibility to become President.  Instead, we the public are shown a fraudulent birth certificate (short version)- a certificate of live birth,  that was deemed credible by factcheck.org (which by the way, is funded by the Anneneburg Foundation–the board Obama sat on for years with William Ayers of–no conflict of interest there!). Instead of making the lawsuits go away instantly by providing the vault version of his birth certificate, he has refused to do so. Wouldn’t logic dictate to provide it and the lawsuit would go away?  Instead, we have a Democrat, Philip J. Berg, Esq., http://www.obamacrimes.com/ petitioning the U.S. Supreme Court for a ruling on whether his, case Berg vs Obama, et al has standing, and requests that the entire Presidential Election not occur on November 4. Berg vs Obama No. 08-cv-04083. http://dockets.justia.com/docket/court-paedce/case_no-2:2008cv04083/case_id-281573/

Yesterday it seems that privacy laws were broken in Hawaii.   “Hawaii Health Department spokeswoman Janice Okubo told the Tribune state privacy laws and attorney general guidance barred her from confirming the certificate’s authenticity. But, “It looks exactly the same as my own birth certificate,” Okubo said.”  HOW DOES OKUBO KNOW WHAT IT LOOKS LIKE?  http://www.upi.com/Top_News/2008/10/30/Rumor_questions_Obamas_birth_certificate/UPI-64261225393575/  Hiding for months behind privacy laws and legal wrangling, the Health Department Director Dr. Chiyome Fukino has refused to issue a copy of his vaulted birth certificate.  Then, just in time for Halloween trick and treats we have Fukino saying in a report from Associated Press:  “HONOLULU (AP) – State officials say there’s no doubt Barack Obama was born in Hawaii.  Health Department Director Dr. Chiyome Fukino says she and the registrar of vital statistics, Alvin Onaka, have personally verified that the health department holds Obama’s original birth certificate. Fukino says that no state official, including Gov. Linda Lingle, ever instructed that Obama’s certificate be handled differently from any other.  She says state law bars release of a certified birth certificate to anyone who does not have a tangible interest in it.” http://www.khnl.com/Global/story.asp?S=9275581  “State law (Hawai’i Revised Statutes §338-18) prohibits the release of a certified birth certificate to persons who do not have a tangible interest in the vital record,” said DOH Director Chiyome Fukino. “Therefore, I as Director of Health for the State of Hawai’i, along with the Registrar of Vital Statistics who has statutory authority to oversee and maintain these type of vital records, have personally seen and verified that the Hawai’i State Department of Health has Sen. Obama’s original birth certificate on record in accordance with state policies and procedures.”

In a complete head spinning act like the girl from the movie The Exorcist, she makes a statement that not only has she seen Obama’s birth certificate, but that it is authentic and he was in fact born in Hawaii.  Well, that’s a bunch of vomit.  This is the woman who once said,        “All of the evidence that we have says that the beaches are as safe now as they were before the sewage spill.” http://thinkexist.com/quotes/dr._chiyome_fukino/  Seeing that she is so well versed in crap, we are expected to believe that she got off her high horse and broke the law to peer into a sealed document that is protected by her own state of Hawaii’s laws on privacy?

Governor Lingle, clearly has indicated that Obama’s birth certificate not be handled any differently, yet we see a government employee doing just that and breaking the law.  Why now, after months of legal filings has she decided to come forward to admit that she has seen That One’s birth certificate?  When did she see it?  Under who’s authority did she act?  Why is spokesperson Janice Okubo claiming to have knowledge of what Obama’s birth certificate looks like.  If Okubo, a lowly employee got a glimpse of Obama’s birth certificate, at the very least there must be others who may also attest to its content. 

Perhaps Obama should sue in the state of Hawaii since it is obvious that a crime was committed against him by Hawaii’s own Health Department in releasing an opinion, opening a sealed document, and blatantly violating Obama’s own right to privacy.  Had the Hawaii Health Department claimed that Obama was in fact born some where else than Hawaii, the outcome would have serious repercussions on the election and immediate actions would be taken, most certainly in a court of law.  I do not believe that any Court in the land would accept testimony in place of the presentation of an actual document which is easily accessible to an expert witness.  Obama, before he became a politician was a graduate of the Harvard School of Law, and would certainly have never accepted a statement from an expert witness when there is documentation available.

Further implications and a nice write up of her statements are made at http://michaelpatrickleahy.blogspot.com/2008/10/show-us-birth-certificate-hawaii.html

Until Obama himself releases the authentic, vaulted birth certificate, this will not go away, nor should it.  The debate rages on as to who has standing to enforce the rules of eligibility, and in an effort to protect anyone from taking the Office of The President of The United States who is not a citizen, we the people need to see our nominees birth certificates and not take just take someone’s word for it.

America needs to move past this and Obama needs to once and for all release his own birth certificate.  While Obama is in full disclosure mode, he should at the very least make a statement about the dinner he attended for Khalidi with his wife and William Ayers.  

If I were to make public these tapes, containing blunt and candid remarks on many different subjects, the confidentiality of the office of the president would always be suspect.
Richard M. Nixon

Read Full Post »

In the matter of Berg vs Obama, questioning Obama’s citizenship and eligibility to be President, Berg has appealed all the way to the Supreme Court and we are awaiting a ruling which may take until hell freezes over.  None the less, no facts were ruled valid or invalid as they have not been heard. In all these filings the FEC – Federal Election Committee is named along with Obama and rightfully so the FEC made a special filing to the Court requesting relief from the claim since the dismissal of the case not apparently mention them specifically from being dismissed. 

DEFENDANT FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION’S MOTION TO DISMISS FOR LACK OF SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 12(b)(1)

Defendant Federal Election Commission (“FEC” or “Commission”) moves to dismiss the Complaint in this matter pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1) for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Plaintiff’s Complaint does not present an Article III case or controversy because plaintiff lacks standing to raise the issue of a candidate’s constitutional eligibility. Moreover, even if Berg had standing to raise the constitutional eligibility issue, the Commission should be dismissed as a party to this case because it has no oversight over the Constitution’s Presidential Qualifications Clause.

 

The FEC claims it has no oversight in the Constitutions Presidential Election Qualifications clause. 

WHAT, NO OVERSIGHT?  Go and read the brief the FEC filed for yourself and see that the FEC is not in charge of eligibility.  Who the frig is in charge of election qualifications? 

The history of the Berg filings.  http://dockets.justia.com/docket/court-paedce/case_no-2:2008cv04083/case_id-281573/

http://obamacrimes.com/index.php/component/content/article/2-news/49-press-release-10-30-2008-berg-filing-injunction-to-stay-presidential-election

Incidentally Judge Surrick on  wrote “AND NOW, this 27th day of October, 2008, having dismissed Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief, it is ORDERED that all pending motions are DISMISSED as moot. IT IS SO ORDERED.BY THE COURT:/s/ R. Barclay Surrick, Judge.

According to Mr Berg, he has filed two documents:

  1. Application for an Immediate Injunction to Stay the Presidential Election of November 4, 2008; and
  2. Petition for Writ of Certiorari. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Certiorari

 

http://www.fec.gov/ If the Federal Government can’t policy itself to have over sight in Federal Elections, who does?

Read Full Post »

I am convinced that Barry Baraq Mohammed Hussein Dunham Sottero Obama Jr., is not a natural born citizen as required by the U.S. Constitution to be President.  If Obama wins the election as most polls predict, Obama will be an Unconstitutional President the second he raises his right hand to God or Allah and takes the Presidential Oath of Office.

In the opinion of groups like Family Security Matters, “unless Obama can produce an authentic birth certificate proving that he is a “natural born citizen,” then every Democrat member of Congress, every person managing Obama’s campaign, every officer and director of the Democrat National Committee, and every person who has ever taken an oath to “support and defend” the Constitution and is now supporting an Unconstitutional candidate for president, has participated in a vast left-wing conspiracy to defraud millions of Democrats out of hundreds of millions of dollars to elect an Unconstitutional President.” http://familysecuritymatters.org/docLib/20080805_VoterGuide_Aug_4_2008CATOKvf1.pdf

In concealing the whereabouts of his birth, Obama so far has succeeded in dodging the most fundamental requirement of eligibility as President.  Numerous legal proceeding have been filed against Obama to provide proof of his citizenship but most cases have been quick in responding with motions to dismiss further allowing That One to continue to perpetrate fraud on the American people.  Berg vs Obama was dismissed by the US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania last week, for lack of standing, he has appealed to the Supreme Court. No facts were ruled valid or invalid as they have not been heard.  Berg and all citizens of The USA must query the authority of Judge Surrick’s District Court’s decision and the eligibility of Obama’s citizenship.  Berg commented:

“This is a question of who has standing to uphold our Constitution. If I don’t have standing, if you don’t have standing, if your neighbor doesn’t have standing to question the eligibility of an individual to be President of the United States – the Commander-in-Chief, the most powerful person in the world – then who does?”

Summarily, “Berg’s suit sought to present evidence that Obama may have been born in Kenya, where under the law at the time, his mother (a U.S. citizen) would have had to have been 19 years old to have conferred her citizenship to him.  (Obama ACKNOWLEDGES dual citizenship with Kenya on his website https://donate.barackobama.com/page/contribute/splashmagnet_octexp).  Berg also sought to produce evidence that Obama later held Indonesian citizenship when he was adopted by Lolo Soetoro and moved with him to Indonesia.  Indonesia and the U.S. did not recognize dual citizenship at the time, so the only valid citizenship he would have held in that case is Indonesian.  He would have expatriated any U.S. or other citizenship held.”  http://www.chronwatch-america.com/articles/3830/1/Berg-vs-Obama-Headed-for-Supreme-Court/Page1.html  Even if he subsequently regained U.S. citizenship, it would be thru naturalization, which is expressly ineligible to serve as President of the United States under Article II of the Constitution! 

Berg v. Obama No. 08-cv-04083. can be followed here. 


 http://dockets.justia.com/docket/court-paedce/case_no-2:2008cv04083/case_id-281573/

 http://www.supremecourtus.gov/ http://www.scotuswiki.com/index.php?title=Main_Page 

http://obamacrimes.com/index.php/component/content/article/2-news/49-press-release-10-30-2008-berg-filing-injunction-to-stay-presidential-election further explains his appeal to the Supreme Court here. 

The Supreme Court is a busy place and .  But remember: On November 4, we vote for electors, who then vote on December 15 for the President.
Technically, there’s still time, though time is of the essence.  The Electoral College consists of 538 popularly elected representatives who formally select the President and Vice President.  In 2008, it will make the selection on December 15.  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electoral_College_(United_States). 

Perhaps the October Surprise will come in time for Christmas.

Thy will be done, let justice be served

Read Full Post »

http://www.americanthinker.com/2008/10/who_enforces_the_constitutions.html asks who enforces the Constitution’s Natural Born Citizen Clause?  Apparently it isn’t you or I that enforce the Constitution.  We only foot the bill with our taxes to those duly elected, to protect and serve, “We the people. 

Worth the read , excerpted . 

“The 10th Amendment to the Constitution states that the powers not delegated to the federal government, nor prohibited to the states, remain with the states or the people.  Therefore it seems that any state or any person has standing to sue to enforce not just the Natural Born Citizen Clause, but other constitutional requirements and rights, absent some expressly written bar within the Constitution itself.”

Judge Surrick did not agree in Berg vs Obama, which undoubtedly will be refiled.

Read Full Post »

« Newer Posts