Obamacare, Liberty, and Justice for All Gets Challenged in The Supreme Court

The Supreme Court has scheduled a six hours for oral arguments regarding Obamacare March 26–28, 2012. The case is more formally known as The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA). That law along with the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act are the basis of health care reform that were signed into law by President Barack Obama on March 23, 2010.

The law REQUIRES people who do not have employer or government health insurance to buy essential health insurance.  It is also know as the “individual mandate.”  Ironically, the phrase never appears in the 2,409 page mandate.  It also puts penalties on employers who do not provide health insurance directed by politicians standards.  “The National Federation of Independent Business (NFIB)—the nation’s largest small-business advocacy organization—has joined the ranks of twenty state attorneys general in a lawsuit attacking the constitutionality of President Obama’s new healthcare law.”  http://news.heartland.org/newspaper-article/national-small-business-organization-joins-lawsuit-against-obamacare

So you think, screw you I am not participating?  If you refuse you will be charged 1% of your income in 2014 and 2.5% in 2016 penalty.

Obama, who claims to be a Constitutional scholar has failed to take note that the law he signed is in defiance of the 10th amendment which grants the enumerated powers to the State, not the Federal Government.  Nearly half of the America States are suing to stop this absurd abuse of power.

Regulation of non-economic activity under the Commerce Clause is possible only through the Necessary and Proper Clause. The Necessary and Proper Clause confers supplemental authority only when the means adopted to accomplish an enumerated power are ‘appropriate’, are ‘plainly adapted to that end’, and are ‘consistent with the letter and spirit of the constitution.’ Requiring citizen-to-citizen subsidy or redistribution is contrary to the foundational assumptions of the constitutional compact. (Case 3:10-cv-00188-HEH, Document 1. Page 5)

If the Federal Government is allowed to make you buy insurance, what else can it make you do? We already know it make you pay taxes, and there in is a precedent for this case.  Could the government make you subscribe to a National ID? A vaccination? A RFID Tag? Mandatory Military or Civil Service? Take your land? Stop you from owning a legal firearm?

Executive Orders require no Congressional approval but have the same legal weight as laws passed by Congress. The President’s source of authority to issue Executive Orders can be found in the Article II, Section 1 of the Constitution which grants the President “executive Power.” Section 3 of Article II further directs the President to “take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed.” To implement or execute the laws of the land, Presidents give direction and guidance to Executive Branch agencies and departments, often in the form of Executive Orders.

Here are a just few of the 50+ he has signed via http://jiberish.hubpages.com/hub/Obamas-Executive-Orders-A-Menace-to-Society

• Obama enacts stronger “federal hate crimes legislation” to “reinvigorate enforcement at the Department of Justice’s Criminal Section.”

• Obama creates “a fund to help people refinance their mortgages and provide comprehensive supports to innocent homeowners.”

• Obama, following through on his pledge to “meet with the leaders of all nations, friend and foe,” signs a non-aggression pact with Iran.

• Obama doubles foreign aid to $50 billion to cut “poverty around the world in half by 2015.”

• Obama enacts socialized medicine, destroying small businesses with taxes.

• Obama enacts amnesty for illegal aliens.

• Obama enacts legislation demanding carbon friendly cars

There is a complete list of Executive orders here, http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/executive-orders/obama-subjects.html.

What is most striking is Obama’s first executive order was to seal all presidential records. Ohbamababy, what is there to hide? 

After flubbing Obama’s swearing in, in an “abundance of caution,” Chief Justice John G. Roberts, Jr. had once again administered President Barack Obama’s swearing-in as they stood in the Map Room of the White House.

I’m really surprised that anyone was taken in for a moment by Obama and Roberts “flubbing” the oath of office. Obama knows perfectly well that he is not an American citizen and so cannot legally take the oath. This little charade he played out with Roberts was obviously designed to cover up the fraud. Now we know why the Supreme Court refused to hear the birth certificate case — Roberts was in on it from the beginning.

I mean, duh.  http://whiskeyfire.typepad.com/whiskey_fire/2009/01/the-conspiracy-unmaskd.html

http://citizenwells.wordpress.com/arch 23, 2010 has one of the best websites on Obama’s eligibility issues. One may call the group leading the investigation as birthers; we feel it is every citizens birthright to have complete disclosure and transparency.

There is media blackout in effect on the most controversial story of the Obama presidency. The findings of Arizona Sheriff Joe Arpaio’s six-month investigation into Obama’s constitutional eligibility are impressive, yet nothing on CNN, ABC,AP Reuters, etc.  You can find out more here http://www.wnd.com/2012/03/media-blackout-on-eligibility-near-total/

And just what the heck is Obama talking about regarding missile defense with Russia?  Caught on a hot mike- “President Obama: This is my last election. After my election I have more flexibility.” http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/03/president-obama-asks-medvedev-for-space-on-missile-defense-after-my-election-i-have-more-flexibility/  What is so flexible in his utter disregard for the Congress and Senate that he has to wait until after the election?  Will he bring us into another war via the U.N. usurping legislative and executive voting?  More flexibility in his socialist agenda?

The Supreme Court has failed to hear eligibility cases that would make everything he has ever done, moot.  So now we have to have faith that when the Court issues its ruling, expected sometime in June, that it will put an end to this nonsense.

Reason sums up nicely why three reasons to chuck the whole program even before it gets underway. http://reason.com/blog/2012/03/25/3-reasons-to-kill-obamacare-before-it-be

1. It Represents the End of Limited Government

.

2. Its Price Tag is Already Ballooning.

<

3. Obamacare Won’t Make Us Healthier.

<

At the end of the day, the Supreme Court Justices will vote their politics and ideology—not the law.

At least that is what’s on your mind if you are one of the 75 percent of all Americans who, according to a recent Bloomberg Poll, believe that our Supreme Court is all about fulfilling the ideological political agenda of the president and party who handed the Justices their lifetime appointments and not about deciding the issues on their legal merits or an objective interpretation of the Constitution. via http://www.forbes.com/sites/rickungar/2012/03/26/is-the-scotus-deck-already-stacked-against-obamacare/

At the end of the day if the ruling holds, the U.S. government will control nearly 15% of the economy.  How you liking all that “Hope and Change?”

Stay tuned and have a good day, one day it will be your last.  God Bless.

Read Full Post »