Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Posts Tagged ‘NASA’

Venus continues into the SOHO LASCO C3 field of view. 👀 Image.

20130301-085905.jpg

In other astronomy news, big
Day for Spacex. Launch is scheduled 10:10am out of Kennedy Space bound for International Space
station -ISS.

Via twitter @SpaceflightNow: LIVE COVERAGE of Falcon 9’s launch of Dragon to the space station Watch here http://t.co/u2MIzdkJG9 watch live

March 1, 2013-
9 days til Spring!

-30-

Advertisements

Read Full Post »

Coronal Mass Ejection, CME, captured on video. Not earth directed.

Link to video

Feb 26, 2013

-30-

Read Full Post »

HAARP in Alaska remains shuttered for the 8th day with server updates. Got any tinfoil?

20120915-175445.jpg

And just where in the heck is part of the sun in this image from SOHO?

20120915-175712.jpg

20120915-175731.jpg

Read Full Post »

SOHO Coverup by NASA? Emergency Sun Reacquisition.

Is NASA covering up a gigantic UFO sighting on the SOHO cameras?

At least one sharp-eyed observer thinks so and it’s not the first time. SOHO’s live image stream was recently shut down right after viewers spotted a large anomaly in front of the sun. NASA says it was due to a “false trigger of the Coarse Sun Pointing Attitude Anomaly Detector” which could be a fancy way of saying “dust on the lens”. via http://www.anomalist.com/

We have no idea, (well we do have some ideas) as to what the heck the horizontal line is in front of the sun.  We highly doubt it is dust. The image is only showing up of the SOHO LASCO C3 Latest Image. Not on any of the others which you can view here-http://sohowww.nascom.nasa.gov/data/realtime-images.html and the live feed for LASCO is here http://sohowww.nascom.nasa.gov/data/LATEST/current_c3.gif

It’s fair to rule out a bird, a plane and Superman.

NOTE: LACK OF DATA UPDATES. SOHO went into “Emergency Sun Reacquisition” mode on Friday May 4, 2012, caused by a false trigger of the Coarse Sun Pointing Attitude Anomaly Dector. We are working on the recovery of the spacecraft to normal mode. Nominal science operations should be re-established in the next couple of days. http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread838119/pg1

This isn’t the first time NASA has lost SOHO- or SOHO has lost Earth.

At 23:16 GMT on 24 June 1998, after completing its nominal two-year
mission in April 1998, ground controllers lost contact with the SOHO
spacecraft during routine maintenance operations, and the satellite
went into Emergency Sun Reacquisition (ESR) mode. The ESR mode is
activated when an anomaly occurs and the spacecraft loses its
orientation towards the Sun. When this happens, the spacecraft
automatically tries to point itself towards the Sun again by firing its
attitude control thrusters under the guidance of an onboard Sun
sensor.  Efforts to re-establish nominal operations did not succeed and
telemetry was lost, not to be reestablished for several weeks.  http://sohowww.nascom.nasa.gov/operations/Recovery/recovery_diary.html

The findings claimed,

“No fault on the spacecraft contributed to the mishap.”

Check out this funky video claiming to that a, ” Solar Starship De Cloaks Around Sun.”

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U2rp8c3D_i0&feature=player_embedded

Our friends from www.spaceweather.com have this to say-

TWO INCOMING CMEs: A pair of solar eruptions on May 7th hurled coronal mass ejections (CMEs) toward Earth. Forecast tracks prepared by analysts at the Goddard Space Weather Lab suggests that clouds with arrive in succession on May 9th at 13:40 UT and May 10th at 07:54 UT (+/- 7 hours). The double impact could spark moderate geomagnetic storms. High-latitude sky watchers should be alert for auroras.

cme sunspot solar flare 150x150 Sunspot AR1476  100,000 KM Wide   M Class Flares and Earth directed CME   May 8, 2012

Sunspot AR1476. May 7, 2012.

One of the largest sunspot groups in years rotated over the sun’s northeastern limb this weekend. With a least four dark cores larger than Earth, AR1476 sprawls more than 100,000 km from end to end, and makes an easy target for backyard solar telescopes.  http://www.thetruthbehindthescenes.org/

CME’s and maybe incoming space crafts?  Be curious to watch the magnetometers, quake reports and skies in the coming days.

Stay tuned and have a good day, one day it will be your last.  God Bless.

  flag tounge

Open wide, say ahhh and check out more posts from Ahrcanum!

The Swine Flu Report that began in April 2009 is at https://ahrcanum.wordpress.com/swine-flu-report

Shaking, rattling and rolling into the conspiracy, truth and science of EARTHQUAKES, HAARP, EISCAT, Tesla, etc., with more posts at https://ahrcanum.wordpress.com/earthquakes-haarp/

Help spread the word.  SUBSCRIBE  NOW and Follow us on Twitter @ahrcanum or sign up at http://twitter.com/ so you can get the latest updates as soon as they’re posted. Make sure to re-tweet, so all your friends get the heads up too.

Read Full Post »

NASA Releases 5 Rockets Containing Chemtrails of Aluminum at Wallops

NASA this morning launched five suborbital rockets from the Wallops Flight Facility on the Eastern Shore as a means of helping scientists learn more about the jet stream.

We’ll pause while you get your tinfoil hats on…..

Image NASA

Shortly after the last rocket launched, commentators on NASA’s webcast said sightings of chemical trails released by the rockets had been reported from Massachusetts, Maryland, Pennsylvania, Connecticut, New York, West Virginia and Wilmington, N.C.

The tracer trails looked milky-white and were intended to help scientists see how winds move in space. http://hamptonroads.com/2012/03/photo-milky-white-trails-follow-wallops-rocket-launch 

The Anomalous Transport Rocket Experiment (ATREX) is a Heliophysics sounding rocket mission that will gather information needed to better understand the process responsible for the high-altitude jet stream located 60 to 65 miles above the surface of the Earth.

The five rockets will release a chemical tracer that will form milky, white tracer clouds that allow scientists and the public to “see” the winds in space. In addition, two of the rockets will have instrumented payloads, to measure the pressure and temperature in the atmosphere at the height of the high-speed winds. http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/sunearth/missions/atrex.html

Combined photo of four chemical tracer trails in the atmosphere.

Four trimethyl aluminum (TMA) trails from a prior mission flown from Poker Flat, Alaska, in February 2009. Credit: Miguel Larsen/Clemson Univ.

JUST WHAT IS TMA?

Product Name: Aluminum alkyls (trimethylaluminum) (MSDS No. P-6282-B)

Chemical Name: Trimethylaluminum

Chemical Family: Aluminum alkyls

Trade Names: Praxair® TMA

Synonyms: Aluminumtrimethyl, trimethylalane

Product Grades: None assigned.

EMERGENCY OVERVIEW

DANGER! Pyrophoric, flammable liquid and vapor. Ignites on contact with air. Harmful if inhaled or swallowed. May cause eye, skin, and respiratory tract burns. Reacts violently with water or atmospheric moisture. Decomposes into irritating dust that may cause liver and kidney damage. Self-contained breathing apparatus and protective clothing must be worn by rescue workers. Under ambient conditions, this is a colorless liquid.

INCOMPATIBLE MATERIALS: Air, water, moisture, oxidizers

Read the whole Materials Safety Data Sheet at http://www.praxair.com/praxair.nsf/AllContent/7981F9201C63A3BA852575BC006B528E/$File/p6282b.pdf

Praxair, Inc. is a worldwide provider of industrial gases, including atmospheric, process and specialty gases. Praxair helps virtually every industry improve product quality, boost performance and benefit the environment through the application of atmospheric, process and specialty gases. http://www.praxair.com

The map of the mid-Atlantic region of the U.S. shows the projected area where the rockets may be visible while the motors are burning through flight. It also shows the flight profile of each of the five rockets. Credit: NASA/Wallops 

Now we know you all have your tinfoil hats on so you should be extra intelligent to ask- If this is the projected range of where the rockets are visible isn’t this also the projected range of the chemical dispersal of aluminum?

Does it burn up in the atmosphere or does it create an effluent that rains down on a few million people.  Congratulations to NASA on the successful launches.  Really, it is amazing science.  Since they went off at early in the morning, there weren’t a lot of people outdoors.  You can watch the entire launch sequence here http://www.nasa.gov/multimedia/videogallery/index.html?collection_id=81381&media_id=137933911 

“Obviously, releasing chemicals into the atmosphere above the Earth is fodder for “Chemtrail” conspiracy theorists that believe the U.S. government is spraying chemicals into the atmosphere for a whole multitude of insidious motives – from creating a sort of haze to enhance energy weapons to a test for biological weapons delivery systems.” http://www.topsecretwriters.com/2012/03/nasa-cancelled-sounding-rockets-atrex/

Really? The U.S. government reminds us,

Some of the many uses for aluminum are in transportation (automobiles, airplanes, trucks, railcars, marine vessels, etc.), packaging (cans, foil, etc.), construction (windows, doors, siding, etc), consumer durables (appliances, cooking utensils, etc.), electrical transmission lines, machinery, and many other applications. http://minerals.usgs.gov/minerals/pubs/commodity/aluminum/ 

Funny how the USGS happened to leave out the fact that there is aluminum in vaccines. 

The short, eye-opening eBook linked below is titled Aluminum in Vaccines — a Neurological Gamble, by Neil Miller, director of the Thinktwice Global Vaccine Institute. It documents the hazards associated with aluminum-laden vaccines. Children are receiving high concentrations of aluminum in their shots. This well-documented neurotoxin may be more toxic than mercury. http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2009/01/27/mercury-in-vaccines-was-replaced-with-something-even-more-toxic.aspx 

Side Effects of ALUMINUM

CTD: Comparative Toxicogenomics Database Giving insight into how chemicals affect our health.

Comparative Toxicogenomics Database

“These diseases are associated with Aluminum or at least one of its descendants. Each association is curated (M marker/mechanismand/or T therapeutic) and/or inferred (via a curated gene interaction).”

1–100 of 463 results.
Chemical Disease Direct Evidence Inference Network Inference Score References
1. Aluminum Alzheimer Disease M 7 genes: ACEAPPIL1BMAPTMPO;TFTNF 20.48 29
2. Aluminum Inflammation M 7 genes: IL1BLTFMPONOS2;SCGB1A1TFRCTNF 15.32 13
3. Aluminum Lung Diseases M 3 genes: ACESCGB1A1TNF 8.13 3
4. Aluminum Brain Diseases M 2 genes: ALBAPP 4.51 5
5. Aluminum Neoplasms M 1 gene: LTF 3.57 2
6. Aluminum Bronchial Hyperreactivity M 1
7. Aluminum Epilepsy, Tonic-Clonic M 1
8. Aluminum Heavy Metal Toxicity M 1
9. Aluminum Lymphadenitis M 1
10. Aluminum Multiple Sclerosis, Chronic Progressive M 1
11. Aluminum Multiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-Remitting M 1
12. Aluminum Osteomalacia M 1
13. Aluminum Brain Ischemia 8 genes: ACEALBCATGPX1IL1B;NOS2PTGS2TNF 25.43 7
14. Aluminum Liver Cirrhosis, Experimental 8 genes: ACHEALBIL1BMMP2MMP9;NOS2PTGS2TNF 20.43 7
15. Aluminum Oral Submucous Fibrosis 4 genes: MMP2MMP9PTGS2TNF 18.93 1
16. Aluminum Autistic Disorder 8 genes: CATGPX1IL4NOS2;PLA2G4APTGS2TFXDH 18.20 7
17. Aluminum Reperfusion Injury 6 genes: IL1BMPONOS2PTGS2TNF;XDH 17.99 11
18. Aluminum Breast Neoplasms 10 genes: EPORGPX1IL1BMMP2;NOS2PLA2G4APTGS2SLC2A1TFRC;TNF 17.97 16
19. Aluminum Colonic Neoplasms 7 genes: IL1BLTFMMP9NOS2;PTGS2SLC2A1TNF 17.95 8
20. Aluminum Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal 4 genes: CATIL1BPTHTNF 17.79 3
21. Aluminum Brain Injuries 6 genes: ALBIL1BMMP9PTGS2;S100BTNF 17.43 7
22. Aluminum Lung Neoplasms 8 genes: ACEGPX1MAPK3MPO;NOS2PTGS2TFRCTNF 17.07 9
23. Aluminum Leishmaniasis, Cutaneous 4 genes: IL1BIL4MMP2TNF 16.58 2
24. Aluminum Cell Transformation, Neoplastic 5 genes: CATMMP9NOS2SLC2A1;TFRC 14.57 4
25. Aluminum Heart Failure 7 genes: ACEALBIL1BNOS2PTH;TNFXDH 14.50 7
26. Aluminum Carcinoma, Squamous Cell 5 genes: GPX1HIF1AMAPK3MMP9;PTGS2 13.03 8
27. Aluminum Asthma 5 genes: CATIL4MMP9SCGB1A1TNF 12.72 9
28. Aluminum Myocardial Reperfusion Injury 4 genes: ALBHIF1ANOS2TFRC 12.61 3
29. Aluminum Burns 3 genes: MPONOS2PTGS2 12.50 2
30. Aluminum Bone Neoplasms 3 genes: MMP2MMP9PTGS2 12.28 2
31. Aluminum Chondroma 2 genes: IDH1IDH2 12.11 1
32. Aluminum Carcinoma, Hepatocellular 6 genes: ACEACLYMMP2MMP9;PTGS2SLC2A1 12.04 8
33. fluoroaluminum Carcinoma, Hepatocellular 3 genes: ABCB1IGF2PTK2 11.95 4
34. Aluminum Hyperemia 4 genes: CATIL1BNOS2PTGS2 11.56 4
35. Aluminum Enchondromatosis 2 genes: IDH1IDH2 11.54 2
36. Aluminum Kidney Failure, Chronic 4 genes: ACEALBCATPTGS2 11.11 5
37. Aluminum Sepsis 4 genes: MAPK3MMP9NOS2TNF 11.09 5
38. Aluminum Duodenal Ulcer 3 genes: NOS2PLA2G4APTGS2 10.70 3
39. Aluminum Cerebral Hemorrhage 4 genes: ACEMMP2MMP9S100B 10.45 8
40. Aluminum Stomach Ulcer 4 genes: MMP9NOS2PTGS2TNF 10.44 4
41. Aluminum Cardiomyopathies 5 genes: CATIL1BIL4MAPK3PTGS2 10.41 5
42. Aluminum Arthritis, Experimental 3 genes: IL1BIL4TNF 10.22 4
43. Aluminum Calcinosis 3 genes: IL1BMMP2MMP9 10.14 2
44. Aluminum Drug-Induced Liver Injury 7 genes: ALBIL1BLTFMMP2PTGS2;TFTNF 10.14 7
45. Aluminum Marfan Syndrome 2 genes: MMP2MMP9 9.94 1
46. Aluminum PLASMODIUM FALCIPARUM BLOOD INFECTION LEVEL 2 genes: NOS2TNF 9.85 1
47. Aluminum Stroke 4 genes: ACEALBNOS2PTGS2 9.74 6
48. Aluminum Keratosis 2 genes: CATMPO 9.63 1
49. Aluminum Neoplasm Metastasis 4 genes: MMP2MMP9PTGS2TNF 9.56 5
50. Aluminum Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracic 2 genes: MMP2MMP9 9.51 1
51. Aluminum Aortic Rupture 2 genes: MMP2MMP9 9.51 1
52. Aluminum Enterocolitis, Necrotizing 2 genes: LTFNOS2 9.44 2
53. Aluminum HIV Wasting Syndrome 2 genes: IL1BTNF 9.33 1
54. Aluminum PARKINSON DISEASE, LATE-ONSET 2 genes: DBHMAPT 9.28 1
55. Aluminum Oligodendroglioma 2 genes: IDH1IDH2 9.22 1
56. Aluminum Hypersensitivity 3 genes: ALBIL4TNF 9.10 2
57. Aluminum Cardiovascular Diseases 4 genes: ACEALBGPX1PTGS2 8.99 5
58. Aluminum Disease Models, Animal 3 genes: ALBAPPS100B 8.88 4
59. Aluminum Brain Edema 3 genes: MMP9NOS2S100B 8.86 3
60. Aluminum Hemangioma 2 genes: IDH1IDH2 8.83 1
61. Aluminum Berylliosis 2 genes: ACETNF 8.77 5
62. Aluminum Diabetic Cardiomyopathies 2 genes: KLK1TNF 8.50 2
63. Aluminum Pulmonary Fibrosis 3 genes: IL1BIL4TNF 8.49 5
64. Aluminum Urticaria 4 genes: ALBIL1BMPOTNF 8.49 4
65. Aluminum Glioblastoma 3 genes: IL1BMMP2MMP9 8.29 2
66. Aluminum Myocardial Stunning 2 genes: NOS2TNF 8.27 1
67. Aluminum Psoriasis 3 genes: IL4NOS2TNF 8.24 3
68. Aluminum Coronary Restenosis 2 genes: ACETNF 8.23 2
69. Aluminum Glioma 3 genes: IDH1PTGS2TFRC 8.21 3
70. Aluminum Nerve Degeneration 4 genes: APPATXN3EPORTNF 8.20 6
71. Aluminum Adenocarcinoma 4 genes: ACEIL1BPTGS2TNF 8.18 6
72. Aluminum Mitochondrial Myopathies 2 genes: IL1BTNF 8.15 1
73. Aluminum Status Epilepticus 4 genes: CATNOS2PTGS2TNF 8.15 7
74. Aluminum Hyperalgesia 5 genes: IL1BMAPK3NOS2PTGS2;TNF 8.01 12
75. Aluminum Cachexia 2 genes: PTGS2TNF 7.95 1
76. Aluminum Glomerulonephritis 3 genes: ALBIL1BTNF 7.86 10
77. Aluminum Arthritis, Psoriatic 2 genes: NOS2TNF 7.80 2
78. Aluminum Aortic Diseases 2 genes: MMP2MMP9 7.79 1
79. Aluminum Respiratory Tract Diseases 2 genes: ACEALB 7.69 2
80. Aluminum Obesity 3 genes: GPX1TFRCTNF 7.63 3
81. Aluminum Peripheral Nervous System Diseases 5 genes: APOBDBHGFAPGPX1TNF 7.62 2
82. Aluminum Seizures 7 genes: ACHECATCHATIL1BNOS2;PTGS2SLC2A1 7.53 10
83. Aluminum Gliosis 2 genes: GFAPMAPK3 7.52 2
84. Aluminum Neurogenic Inflammation 2 genes: APPPTGS2 7.47 2
85. Aluminum Esophageal Neoplasms 3 genes: HIF1ANOS2PTGS2 7.46 8
86. Aluminum Cholangiocarcinoma 2 genes: NOS2PTGS2 7.38 1
87. Aluminum Multiple Organ Failure 2 genes: MMP9TNF 7.30 3
88. Aluminum Skin Neoplasms 3 genes: HIF1AMMP9PTGS2 7.27 5
89. Aluminum Stevens-Johnson Syndrome 2 genes: ALBNOS2 7.22 2
90. Aluminum Pancreatic Neoplasms 3 genes: HIF1APTGS2TNF 7.14 6
91. Aluminum Polymyositis 2 genes: IL1BTNF 7.12 1
92. Aluminum Arthritis, Rheumatoid 3 genes: MMP2PTGS2TNF 7.11 4
93. Aluminum Respiratory Hypersensitivity 2 genes: IL4TNF 7.05 1
94. Aluminum Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis 2 genes: PLA2G4APTGS2 7.02 1
95. Aluminum Dermatomyositis 2 genes: IL1BTNF 7.01 1
96. Aluminum Fumaric aciduria 1 gene: FH 6.85 1
97. Aluminum Leiomyomatosis and renal cell cancer, hereditary 1 gene: FH 6.85 1
98. Aluminum Precancerous Conditions 3 genes: CATMPOPTGS2 6.83 3
99. Aluminum Diabetic Neuropathies 2 genes: MMP2MMP9 6.80 1
100. Aluminum Epilepsy 3 genes: ALBGFAPGPX1 6.78 4
WHEW!   Need more?
 In 2004, the McLaughlin Centre for Population Health Risk Assessment at the University of Ottawa was asked by the International Aluminium Institute to conduct a comprehensive review of the potential human health risks associated with aluminium, aluminium oxide, and aluminium hydroxide. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency agreed to co-sponsor the risk assessment.

HUMAN HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENT FOR ALUMINIUM, ALUMINIUM OXIDE, AND ALUMINIUM HYDROXIDE http://www.world-aluminium.org/cache/fl0000237.pdf

We concluded that there is strong evidence that aluminium can cause irritation following exposure via either inhalation or injection. Modest evidence of an effect exists for reproductive toxicity following oral exposure, for neurological toxicity following either oral or injection exposure, and for bone toxicity following injection exposure…(p29)

So aluminum may be bad in a vaccine.  Aluminum can be good in a screen door.
The NASA audio portion of the video explains that the ATREX program chemical will burn orange. It looks white to our untrained eye.  We did find this patent from GTE Laboratories Incorporated that seems to support that it could have luminescent property makes the most sense for tracking chemtrails in night launch. Method for making moisture insensitive zinc sulfide based luminescent materials

Whatever color it is and whatever the safe level of margin for the use of aluminum is, the OSHA REGULATORY STATUS: says This material is considered hazardous by the OSHA Hazard Communications Standard (29 CFR 1910.1200).

The U.S. government just shot it nearly 60 miles into the jet stream.  We look forward to more scientific studies.

UPDATED- The Aluminum Fluoride Connection here https://ahrcanum.wordpress.com/2012/03/30/aluminum-flouride-tinfoil/

Stay tuned and have a good day, one day it will be your last.  God Bless.

  flag tounge

Open wide, say ahhh and check out more posts from Ahrcanum!

The Swine Flu Report that began in April 2009 is athttps://ahrcanum.wordpress.com/swine-flu-report

Shaking, rattling and rolling into the conspiracy, truth and science of EARTHQUAKES, HAARP, EISCAT, Tesla, etc., with more posts athttps://ahrcanum.wordpress.com/earthquakes-haarp/

Help spread the word.  SUBSCRIBE  NOW and Follow us on Twitter @ahrcanum or sign up at http://twitter.com/ so you can get the latest updates as soon as they’re posted. Make sure to re-tweet, so all your friends get the heads up too.

Read Full Post »

What’s twisting our antenna,

January 19, 2012?

Phobos-Grunt, what really happened?

The Phobos-Grunt Probe destined for Mars has apparently completed its earth orbit, crashing onto our Blue Marble somewhere, sometime on January 15, 2012.  We asked last month if HAARP had something to do with its failed mission in December in this article- https://ahrcanum.wordpress.com/2011/12/21/did-haarp-hit-phobos-grunt-conspiracy-mars/

Russian Federal Space Agency specialists prepare the Phobos-Grunt spacecraft on October 18, 2011. “Crashed into ocean: Russian Federal Space Agency specialists prepare the Phobos-Grunt spacecraft on October 18, 2011.”

Looks like we aren’t the only ones questioning HAARP in Alaska, and other radar installations.

Lt. Gen. Nikolay Rodionov, a former commander of Russia’s ballistic missile systems, says covert U.S. radio beams — not any Russian screw-ups — scrubbed the interplanetary trip

In a November 24, 2011 interview with the Russian news agency Interfax, Rodionov said ‘powerful American radar’ in Alaska ‘could have influenced the control systems of our interplanetary rover,'” Nash wrote in his post:

Rodionov was quoted saying the U.S. wants to use the ionosphere as part of its missile defense, although he did not elaborate. A subsequent article in India’s The Hindu expanded on Rodionov’s statement, indicating that he was likely referring to the U.S.’s (HAARP) observatory established in 1993. http://www.alaskadispatch.com/article/russians-blame-us-militarys-alaska-haarp-array-mars-probe-failure

ESA failed to contact it, suggesting that the data was encrypted.  Russia claims to have gotten telemetry and had exchanged data.  If they did, it wasn’t enough to spare Phobos-Grunt’s demise.

Numerous satellite tracking sites were able to pinpoint its location- until apparently, the last hours of Phobos life.  Either communication was lost, demand exceeded band-with or there was some other nefarious reason we couldn’t track its apparent final demise- if in fact, it has crashed at all.

www.n2yo.com/?s=37872   www.satview.org/   www.satflare.com/track.php?q=phobos

Oh wait!  The Federal Space Agency of Russia said it suffered a DDos-attack says http://lenta.ru/news/2012/01/16/hacked/ via:

Eugene Kaspersky
e_kaspersky Eugene Kaspersky

Russian Space Agency fails 2 report the fall of Phobos-Grunt due 2 a hacker attack http://bit.ly/z4hTfh <- DDoS a good excuse 4 everything

Website of the Federal Space Agency of Russia suffered DDoS-attack in the night from Sunday to Monday, January 16. Об этом сообщает “Интерфакс” со ссылкой на начальника пресс-службы Роскосмоса Алексея Кузнецова. Informs “Interfax”referring to the head of the press service of the Russian Space Agency, Alexei Kuznetsov.

По его словам, из-за атаки сайт ведомства не смог своевременно сообщить о факте падения “Фобос-Грунта”. According to him, due to the attack site office was unable to timely report the fact of the fall of the “Phobos-Grunt.” Утром 16 января на веб-ресурсе Роскосмоса висела стандартная “заглушка” от хостинговой компании “Мастерхост”, которая гласила: “Виртуальный сервер не существует или временно не функционирует”. On the morning of January 16 on your Web server hung Roscosmos standard “stub” of the hosting company “Masterhost”, which read: “Virtual Server does not exist or is temporarily not functioning.”

HACKED?

And it gets better-The  U.S. Removes Phobos-Grunt Data from Web! http://www.aviationweek.com/aw/generic/story_channel.jsp?channel=space&id=news/awx/2012/01/18/awx_01_18_2012_p0-415578.xml&headline=U.S.%20Removes%20Phobos-Grunt%20Data%20from%20Web

File:USSTRATCOM emblem.jpg

The website, Space Track, is managed by U.S. Strategic Command (Stratcom) at Offutt AFB, Neb.,

…the military deviated from normal practice when it removed links to the spacecraft’s reentry predictions while neglecting to publish final reentry data for the defunct probe Jan. 15. Instead, the site posted a vague statement asserting Phobos-Grunt “decayed within the forecast period of 16:59-17:47” GMT….

Weeden, a former U.S. Air Force officer who directed the Joint Space Operations Center’s orbital analyst training program, has no idea what would motivate the U.S. military to break with standard protocol for Phobos-Grunt. But he says the unusual steps taken by the military raise questions about the reliability of its data with regard to high-profile or important events such as Phobos-Grunt.

“This also appears to run counter to the expressed policy of the U.S. government to improve its data-sharing efforts on space situational awareness, and undermines efforts by other U.S. government agencies such as NASA and the State Department to communicate with the public and other countries on reentries,” Weeden says.

Got your tinfoil hat on yet?

Phobos was allegedly stuck around 201km perigee and 275 km apogee and had gradually declined when reports came in that it had crashed 17:45 UTC, 1:45 EST.  Crashed where?  Did it crash at all?  The leading answers are the Pacific, central Brazil, some place off Chile or the Atlantic.  

Previously Russia’s envoy to NATO and now Deputy Prime Minister Dmitry Rogozin isn’t ruling out that the launch could have failed from U.S. radar saying on Tuesday, ‘This theory has a right to exsist. I am taking the investigation into the reasons for the Phobos-Grunt failure under personal control.’  Rodionov and Rogozin don’t stand alone in the HAARP theory.

The Soviet Union once a country united is nothing, if not cohesive in lying blame on others.  Roscosmos head Vladamir Popovkin sad the probe could have been caused by, “interference from a foreign technical facility.”

“Experts do not dismiss the possibility that the probe could have accidentally come under the impact of emissions [from a U.S. radar stationed on the Marshall Islands], whose megawatt impulse triggered the malfunctioning of on-board electronics.” Kommersant, the business daily citing an unnamed source in the Russian Space industry.”

In the Marshall Islands, it is The Kwajalein Mission Control Center (KMCC) that  provides the central control, command, communications, and computing essential for directing the realtime data collection efforts of the RTS sensors.  A high bandwidth submarine fiber optic transmission system provides encrypted connectivity between KMCC and the entire range. complex….https://ahrcanum.wordpress.com/2009/09/30/earthquake-conspiracy/

If the Marshall Island Control Center had nothing to do with Phobos-Grunt demise, at the very least shouldn’t they have been tracking it?

Many Russian officials and military brass blame many natural calamities on HAARP. Tatiana Astrakhankina, a former Duma deputy, has been quoted as saying: “The catastrophic flood in Germany, France and the Czech Republic, tornadoes near the Italian coast, which had never witnessed tornadoes before, are nothing but the results of U.S. geophysical weapons tests.” In 2002, the Defense Committee created a table showing the adverse climate impact of the HAARP tests of ionosphere and magnetosphere modifications. http://indrus.in/articles/2012/01/19/what_brought_down_phobos-grunt_14560.html

Photo © RIA Novosti. “The Phobos-Grunt inter-planetary probe.”

Phobos-Grunt fragments have crashed down in the Pacific Ocean,” Russia’s Defense Ministry official Alexei Zolotukhin told RIA Novosti, adding that the fragments fell in 1,250 kilometers to the west of the island of Wellington.

The spacecraft allegedly fell at about 21:45 on Sunday Moscow time [17:45 GMT].

The head of Roscosmos, Vladimir Popovkin, previously said the probe would break up during reentry into the atmosphere and none of the fragments are likely to reach the Earth.  http://en.rian.ru/world/20120115/170769403.html

Now- is that a hacked report from RIA? You tell me.

If a tree falls over in the woods and there is no one to see it or hear it, did it really fall?

Radar image of Phobos Grunt  The German Tira (Tracking and Imaging Radar) facility saw Phobos-Grunt during its last days.

Phobos-Grunt was a 13.5-tonne spacecraft’s with an estimated 7.5 tons of fuel,  stored in aluminum tanks that should have exploded upon reentry making quite a scene.  Perhaps visible from the ISS and certainly visible to at least on of the 1,000’s of other orbital satellites, no?  German tracking shared this undated photo suggesting that the Phobos-Grunt last days were on fire.

A Russian space probe designed to boost the nation’s pride on a bold mission to a moon of Mars came down in flames Sunday, showering fragments into the south Pacific west of Chile’s coast, officials said.

Pieces from the Phobos-Ground, which had become stuck in Earth’s orbit, landed in water 1,250 kilometers (775 miles) west of Wellington Island in Chile’s south, the Russian military Air and Space Defense Forces said in a statement carried by the country’s news agencies.

The military space tracking facilities were monitoring the probe’s crash, its spokesman Col. Alexei Zolotukhin said. Zolotukhin said the deserted ocean area is where Russia guides its discarded space cargo ships serving the International Space Station.

RIA Novosti news agency, however, cited Russian ballistic experts who said the fragments fell over a broader patch of Earth’s surface, spreading from the Atlantic and including the territory of Brazil. It said the midpoint of the crash zone was located in the Brazilian state of Goias.  http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/europe/failed-russian-spacecraft-will-crash-on-earth-within-hours-agency-says/2012/01/15/gIQA1e9U0P_story.html

Julius Whittington

@JJWBlackRyder Julius Whittington wrote-
 
#Phobos-Grunt Reported to have fallen in the Pacific west of Chile @ approx. 17:45 UTC – graphic via #GoSatWatch http://pic.twitter.com/UMWOkGax
pic.twitter.com/UMWOkGax

In Chile’s South?

Turn your antennae to ALMA, The Atacama Large Millimeter/sub millimeter Array or radio telescope in the Atacama desert of norther Chile. At 16,500 feet, (5,000 meters) scientist are tracking supernovae, black holes, and the final frontier.  Apparently ALMA can not track one little lost satellite.  Is the new fiber-optic system capable of outbound communication interruption to a satellite?

What else is in the region of the alleged fall?

The Brazilian Decimetric Array (BDA) in Cachoeira Paulista, São Paulo, Brazil is a 38-element radio telescope interferometer working in the frequency range of 1.2-6.0 GHz.- wiki. And what is the frequency of HAARP?

Two firings from the probe’s hydrazine-fueled cruise stage were planned over South America shortly after launch in November and it failed in the same region.

Certainly, it seems Phobos-Grunt was down and destroyed before it could have passed over South America.  http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-16491457

Rather convenient if the reports are true that there was no one to witness Phobos-Grunt’s crash.  Shouldn’t there be a black box of sorts?

NASA and the Brazil Space Agency have Inked a Earth Sciences Agreement, http://moonandback.com/2011/10/27/nasa-brazil-space-agency-ink-earth-sciences-agreement/ What else may they have agreed to cooperate on?

Our personal favorite failure blame lies with an asteroid.

members of the official investigation team suspect the United States of ‘accidentally’ lobotomizing the probe right after it was launched. In this scenario, the Americans were innocently beaming radar signals deep into space to get measurements of a passing asteroid, and forgot to warn Russia. The probe passed through the beam by chance and its autopilot was fried. http://spectrum.ieee.org/tech-talk/aerospace/space-flight/russian-probe-crash-sparks-new-controversy .

Last, but not least- The Inter-Agency Space Debris Coordination Committee (IADC)  an international governmental forum for the worldwide coordination of activities related to the issues of man-made and natural debris in space has, of course, no comment. http://www.iadc-online.org/index.cgi?item=home

Roscosmos is expected to hold a news conference tomorrow, January 20, 2012.  Yeah, we’re really holding our breath.

Stay tuned and have a good day; one day it will be your last.  God Bless.

  flag tounge

Open wide, say ahhh and check out more posts from Ahrcanum!

The Swine Flu Report that began in April 2009 is at https://ahrcanum.wordpress.com/swine-flu-report

Shaking, rattling and rolling into the conspiracy, truth and science of EARTHQUAKES, HAARP, EISCAT, Tesla, etc., with more posts at https://ahrcanum.wordpress.com/earthquakes-haarp/

Help spread the word.  SUBSCRIBE  NOW and Follow us on Twitter or sign up at http://twitter.com/ so you can get the latest updates as soon as they’re posted. Make sure to re-tweet, so all your friends get the heads up too.

Read Full Post »

What’s twisting our antenna,

December 21, 2011?

Did HAARP hit the Phobos-Grunt Probe?  Probably not, but put your tinfoil hats on anyway.

Soyuz expedition 30

A Soyuz rocket launched successfully from the Russian-leased Baikonur cosmodrome this morning on its way to the ISS.  We woke up early to watch a beautiful launch. The Russian Soyuz TMA-03M spacecraft  is also known by its US designation of 29S.  http://www.universetoday.com/92014/video-soyuz-launches-for-holiday-hookup-with-the-international-space-station/

On December 17, 2010,  from the new $800 million facility in French Guiana, “A Russian Soyuz rocket fired six satellites into space Friday, launching missions to serve defense agencies in Europe and Chile with high-resolution imagery and electronic intelligence.”  http://www.spaceflightnow.com/soyuz/vs02/111217launch/

In the post Shuttle era it is a huge sigh of relief.  In August, an unmanned Progress cargo ship headed for the space station crashed – the rocket that failed was the same kind used by the Soyuz. 

The rocket that launched Phobos was a Zenit-2.

The Fobos-Grunt or Phobos-Grunt or just Phobos  is an attempted Russian probe that was designed to collect rock and samples from one of Mars’ moons Phobos, and bring them back to Earth to study.  It also carries China’s first Mars satellite, Yinhou-1.  A pretty ambitious effort considering this is Russia 16th failed mission attempt to the Red Planet. 

Phobos was launched on 9 November 2011 at 02:16 local time (8 November 2011, 20:16 UTC)  from the Cosmodrome. Apparently, subsequent rocket burns intended to set the craft on a course for Mars failed, leaving it stranded in low Earth orbit. It’s stuck around 201km perigee and 275 km apogee giving skywatchers plenty of looks.

Skywatcher Phobos-Grunt Photo

 
Sky watcher Ralf Vandebergh snapped this shot of the stranded Russian Mars probe Phobos-Grunt on Nov. 29, 2011, from the southern Netherlands.
CREDIT: Ralf Vandebergh  View full size image  pix link-http://www.space.com/13811-russian-phobos-grunt-spacecraft-unresponsive.html

At about two and a half hours into the mission, something went haywire and it is now expected to mostly burn up in the Earth’s atmosphere.  So why the failure?

Eleven minutes after launch, it was in an elliptical orbit around 345km above the Earth.  In the attempt to raise the orbit and get Phobos on its mission to Mars, two firings from the probes 13 tons of hydrazine fueled tanks were planned. 

Russian Space agency officials say neither burn took place.

The Phobos-Grunt That Wasn't. A Roscosmos rendering of Phobos-Grunt approaching Mars and its moon Phobos. Roscosmos

Along comes an amateur astronomy taking a mediocre video that captures what appears to be Phobos with an unidentified object nearby.

Video of the “Phobos – Grunt Engine Burn – Failed – Passage pelo Brasil – retido na órbita,” http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=INOwSWTHe20&feature=player_embedded  The video appears to show a red flare on a supposed Phobos and another dropping object at about a minute in.

Two Objects in Orbit from amateur satellite watcher Ted Molczan http://www.satobs.org/seesat/Nov-2011/0069.html

I have just received word from the project that there seems to be a serious problem.

After the planned first burn of the engine, the spacecraft was not found in the predicted orbit. Alternative radar
observations preliminarily show that there are two objects in the orbit with parameters the same as before the planned
engine burn. Observers are requested to attempt to discover the spacecraft in the initial LEO parking orbit.

This is the official pre-launch estimated TLE of the LEO parking orbit:

1 55500U 11000A   11312.95486111 -.00010748  00000-0 -11606-4 0    14
2 55500  51.4279   0.6058 0106375  25.7555 298.8256 15.98414689    33

I imagine that one of the two objects seen on the radar could be the final stage of the booster. Accurate descriptions
and counts of the number of objects seen, as well as position and time would be useful.

Ted Molczan

That  makes TWO REPORTS OF TWO OBJECTS near Phobos in Earth’s orbit.

Want to go for THREE REPORTS of Objects Near Phobos? http://www.satobs.org/seesat/Nov-2011/0087.html

Here in Brazil some observers reported that they observed the probe in the
“illuminated phase” of the expected path.

But one of my colleagues (called Heverton) that lives in the city of
Umuarama of state of Paraná (south of Brazil –
*http://tinyurl.com/umuarama*), makes a report at 23:00 (UT)that saw
two objects in the orbit, in the own words:
*
“I saw, but I found odd. First I saw a point a little slow, but I think it was
the ISS. Then I saw Phobos and right behind it a point with a light a little
weaker. I think it was the remains of the rocket??
If my eyes not deceived me, I saw the light getting a little stronger
at the estimated
time of ignition. Too bad I can do any record”*

I asked more accurate details about the observation and today he wrote:
*
“Accurately I can not say anything, but I saw it from about 20:55:30 and
20:57:00 (22:55:30 and 22:57:00 UT) . The brightness of the probe was greater
than the ISS shines normally, but much less bright than it was Jupiter. The
position, the best I can remember I tried to sketch with the help of
Stellarium*:”

http://twitpic.com/7cczec/full

Regards
Carlos Bella

ROSCOSMOS home page http://www.federalspace.ru/?lang=en is quiet on Phobos and the objects.  Vladimir Popovkin has not been and has said, “The probe will break up during reentry into the atmosphere and none of the fragments are likely to reach Earth.” http://en.rian.ru/science/20111213/170212896.html

Yeah. Okay.

It was reported on December 6 buy columnist Leonard David from Space Insider that, “Pieces of the spacecraft had begun breaking off and re-entering the atmosphere with the rest of it expected to follow by early January. After consulting with Russian mission managers, the European Space Agency has stopped attempting to communicate with the vehicle, with one analyst noting that the mission “appears dead in the water”.http://www.space.com/13846-phobos-grunt-russia-mars-mission-doomed.html

Was Phobos attacked by aliens?  There are hundreds of satellites besides this one to assail.  Was it the fact that we were about to invade Mars with an Earth species?  Oh, yes we were.  The Living Interplantetary Flight Experiment (LIFE) from The Planetary Society stored a package of micro-organisms onboard in the return capsule.  The bacterium Deinoccus radiodurans, a tiny microscopic invertebrate with eight legs and is known for its ability to survive high doses of radiation. http://planetary.org/programs/projects/life/facts.html

If it wasn’t the aliens or just some screw up along the way could it have been HAARP?  Lt. Gen. Nikolay Rodionov, a former commander of Russia’s ballistic missile systems, says covert U.S. radio beams — not any Russian screw-ups — scrubbed the interplanetary trip

In a November 24 interview with the Russian news agency Interfax, Rodionov said ‘powerful American radar’ in Alaska ‘could have influenced the control systems of our interplanetary rover,'” Nash wrote in his post:

Rodionov was quoted saying the U.S. wants to use the ionosphere as part of its missile defense, although he did not elaborate. A subsequent article in India’s The Hindu expanded on Rodionov’s statement, indicating that he was likely referring to the U.S.’s (HAARP) observatory established in 1993.

Rodionov was quoted saying the U.S. wants to use the ionosphere as part of its missile defense, although he did not elaborate. A subsequent article in India’s The Hindu expanded on Rodionov’s statement, indicating that he was likely referring to the U.S.’s (HAARP) observatory established in 1993.http://www.alaskadispatch.com/article/russians-blame-us-militarys-alaska-haarp-array-mars-probe-failure

Nothing personal but if anyone is going to use the ionosphere, I hope it is the U.S.A.  So what was HAARP up to?

magnetometer plot...NOV 8, 9
     
    Ending Date: (YYYYMMDD)

All things considered, a flea on a camel’s ass makes more of a hicup than that.  

So maybe it wasn’t exactly HAARP. Or maybe HAARP was on re-runs from a previous day.  Could it have been an early warning radar interference mechanism?  Could it have been the Russians themselves? 

Recall Project Woodpecker and it’s satellite jamming efforts.  This was followed by the Duga-2, built on the same site and also used as our daily entry picture.

File:Woodpecker array.jpg

Woodpecker tracked launches from the far east and submarines in the Pacific Ocean as the missiles flew toward. It’s site lies within the 30 kilometer Zone of Alienation around the Chernobyl power plant.  It’s debatable if it remains operational today.

Woody Woodpecker

The Russian space program generally speaking is like the U.S. program, running out of money.  So who does have the money and the science to kill Phobos? 

Remember the lost cosmonauts?  http://www.lostcosmonauts.com/default.htm Wasn’t one allegedly held in China?  Good like minded communists think alike.  What advantage would they have in disabling Phobos?

 Phobos mission to go to Phobos has failed, sort of–

*Maybe it was intercepted by extraterrestrial intelligence

*Maybe it was the powers that be in a New World Order

*Maybe it will crash on Earth causing a disaster

*Maybe the bacteria on board is linked to cancer, AIDS, or anthrax

*Maybe it was HAARP

*Maybe it just didn’t work

*Maybe it will land in a populated area/70% of Earth is water.

*Maybe Phobos is well on its way and this is a different satellite

*Maybe the Martians are hanging a do not disturb sign

Andrew Basiago has stated that, in the late 1960s, he participated in a secret United States program that examined the concept of time travel using a machine that was developed by the Serbian inventor Nikola Tesla.  http://listverse.com/2011/06/22/top-10-people-shrouded-in-controversy/
  

0 61 Mars Spirit Figure

One can always check out alleged-visual evidence that is is drawn from, verifiable in, and supported by the official science data-  http://www.marsanomalyresearch.com/

OR…

Courtesy: NASA/APL

Now let’s see what it probably resembles:

Enlarged…

Considering the shadows and contour, this is what comes up by deduction…

Courtesy: Artvision
By Yves Vaillancourt

Back to what is probably reality-

Recent tracking on Phobos is from twitter @OrbitOps Phobos Grunt visibility 2011-12-21 UTC 24 hrs

Also tracking re-entry-

Phobos Grunt

Phobos Grunt

Stranded on Earth orbit
Monitoring its orbital decay and assisting in analysis, prediction and visual of its re-entry http://bit.ly/PhG-reentry

You can follow track Phobos Grunt and a multitude of other satellites live at http://www.satview.org/?sat_id=55500U

While we are watching the skies, you may be interested to know that private space company SpaceX’s Dragon spacecraft is due to make its first launch to the space station Feb. 7 atop a SpaceX Falcon 9 booster.

Last but not least- The Inter-Agency Space Debris Coordination Committee (IADC)  an international governmental forum for the worldwide coordination of activities related to the issues of man-made and natural debris in space has of course, no comment. http://www.iadc-online.org/index.cgi?item=home 

Stay tuned and have a good day; one day it will be your last.  God Bless.

  flag tounge

Open wide, say ahhh and check out more posts from Ahrcanum!

The Swine Flu Report that began in April 2009 is at https://ahrcanum.wordpress.com/swine-flu-report

Shaking, rattling and rolling into the conspiracy, truth and science of EARTHQUAKES, HAARP, EISCAT, Tesla, etc., with more posts at https://ahrcanum.wordpress.com/earthquakes-haarp/

Help spread the word.  SUBSCRIBE  NOW and Follow us on Twitter or sign up at http://twitter.com/ so you can get the latest updates as soon as they’re posted. Make sure to re-tweet, so all your friends get the heads up too.

Read Full Post »

Older Posts »