The birth certificate issue really isn’t about Obama, it is more about the law.
Since not one single person in the whole word has ever seen President Elect Obama’s birth certificate, other than maybe him, one wonders if those pursuing his eligibility all the way to SCOTUS- The Supreme Court, have given thought that it is illegal to hire illegal aliens and that the Electoral College could be found in contempt by not verifying his birth certificate. He may very well be just as illegal as his Auntie Zeituni in Boston.
“Anyone employing or contracting with an illegal alien without verifying his work authorization status is guilty of a misdemeanor. Aliens and employers violating immigration laws are subject to arrest, detention, and seizure of their vehicles or property. In addition, individuals or entities who engage in racketeering enterprises that commit (or conspire to commit) immigration-related felonies are subject to private civil suits for treble damages and injunctive relief…..An employer has constructive knowledge that an employee is an illegal unauthorized worker if a reasonable person would infer it from the facts.” http://www.fairus.org/site/PageServer?pagename=iic_immigrationissuecentersbcdd
Couldn’t a reasonable person infer from the fact that he has hidden his birth certificate that he has hidden the truth and may not only be illegal, but unable to hold the Office of President?
A lot of excellent workers are legal aliens and have green cards to allow them to get up ’n go to work here in the land of the free home of the brave but not for the job of President. Obama has never shown us his birth certificate. He has already, admitted he had Kenyan citizenship on his website, “Since Sen. Obama has neither renounced his U.S. citizenship nor sworn an oath of allegiance to Kenya, his Kenyan citizenship automatically expired on Aug. 4,1982.” http://fightthesmears.com/articles/5/birthcertificate. Whereby having had dual citizenship should have preempted him, it hasn’t so far, and perhaps then a natural born citizen means a “citizens of the United States at birth” as defined by U.S. Code, Title 8, Section 1401. Maybe he is eligible, maybe he is not.
Civilian Obama has said, “He did drugs at one point” Pot and Cocaine being his choice. http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,240992,00.html Should the potential leader of the free world undergo random drug testing(s)? Employers do it to employees all the time. I kinda doubt Obama uses illegal substances, he still smokes cigarettes and should be allowed to light up a Marlboro whenever the heck he feel like it, better than a joint with his finger on a nuclear missile.
“I believe what the country is looking for is someone who is open, honest and candid about themselves, said Robert Gibbs, Obama’s spokesman. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/01/02/AR2007010201359.html Also citing the WaPo,Obama said, ”I got high [to] push questions of who I was out of my mind.” Some twenty years later the question of who Obama is, still lingers. Silence seems to be golden when it comes to his birth certificate. In these matters, Obama for being a tall man, has fallen far short of being open, honest and candid.
There are a lot of lines left blank on his job application. Where are his college transcripts that the rest of us are required to produce when applying for a job. In order to enter the military you have to pass the physical, but our future Commander and Chief Obama, in his infinite wisdom, deferred to a one page document that said he is good health.
Not many immigration cases or failed drug tests get prosecuted or punished. The punishment the U.S. Constitution will have gotten if Obama is found ineligible, would be a punishment that America should not have to bear.
The Supreme Court has not decided to hear any matters regarding Obama’s citizenship or the election-yet. Friday, December 5, 2008 will be a big day for America and Leo Donofrio whose case has a conference before all nine Judges. The most interesting thing to date about his case is that DONOFRIO V. WELLS was distributed for conference of December 5, 2008 by the entire Court after a prior referral of the application by Justice Thomas.
Donofrio has been updating his case against Wells SCOTUS Docket No. 08A407, Donofrio v. Wells and the Cort Wrotnowski, (SCOTUS Docket No. 08A469) on his site http://naturalborncitizen.wordpress.com/. At http://www.obamacrimes.com/ is the Berg v Obama et al filing but he’s been too busy to update with the deadline set by the Court of December 1, 2008 having passed. Most certainly he is preparing more briefs to get a rapid resolution or at the very least, perhaps a stay in the Electoral College. Best bet for Berg info is at -http://www.americasright.com/2008/12/berg-to-file-emergency-injunction-today.html
There is a great argument on whether the issue of his citizenship relies on the Constitutional Law or Common Law over at the Texas Darling Website and it you have a clear moment is certainly worth the read- In part, “The Common Law has always been conflicted on the subject of dual allegiance and naturalization, read Mackenzie and Cockburn. I never said it wasn’t. The Common Law has always allowed limitations, take a look at the various Acts of Succession, Union and Settlement. There is nothing in the natural-born citizen clause to make a Common Law lawyer blink for one second. “To all intents and purposes” is an outright acknowledgment that one is dealing with a fiction which may be ignored at will by the Common Law, it could as easily read “As if”. That is the source of my disagreement with Aleinikoff’s view. If I say, “I accept, to all intents and purposes, that John Doe is a citizen of the United States”, I am saying (a) that I do not know that he is, (b) that I do not believe that he is, or that I strongly doubt the proposition, and (c) that I will nonetheless act upon the supposition that he is until such time as the proposition is either proved or disproved. If you apply English Common Law, as it stands today, Obama would be eligible; if you apply Australian Common Law, as it stands today, he wouldn’t be; if you apply Canadian Common Law, as it stands today, his position would be in doubt. If you regard the US Constitution as a Common Law document he isn’t eligible under US Common Law. “ http://texasdarlin.wordpress.com/2008/12/02/a-reply-to-donofrio/#more-5277 and beats the whole issue with a stick very eloquently here http://texasdarlin.wordpress.com/2008/11/28/natural-born-citizens-or-how-to-beat-a-subject-to-death-with-a-stick/ .
http://aconservativeedge.wordpress.com/2008/12/01/president-elect-barack-h-obama-your-long-form-birth-certificate-is-due-today-supreme-court-of-the-united-states/ Mr. Vieira cited a fraud ruling in a 1977 case called U.S. v. Prudden, which he feels applies in this case.
“Silence can only be equated with fraud when there is a legal and moral duty to speak or when an inquiry left unanswered would be intentionally misleading,” the ruling reads. “We cannot condone this shocking conduct … If that is the case we hope our message is clear. This sort of deception will not be tolerated and if this is routine it should be corrected immediately.”
“The Republican Party of Lincoln has become the party of deceit, dissimulation, duplicity, and double-dealing. The party that claims a moral high ground is seemingly without morality when it comes to the seats of power – they will and have done anything and everything to discredit their opponents as they grapple for control.” http://amusedpen.wordpress.com/2008/12/02/a-vile-gop/ unloads on the GOP like there is no tomorrow and blames this citizenship mess on Republicans. It misses the whole point that Obama should just take the moral high ground.
You and I are his employer. You and I pay his salary. I want his birth certificate. I want a President who qualifies under the U.S. Constitution. I want the Supreme Court to Uphold the laws of the U.S. Constitution and Common Law. Of course, I want to hit the mega zillion lottery. Don’t you want it all too?
Read Full Post »