Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Posts Tagged ‘Berg Supreme Court’

tinfoilhat2

photo linked from http://theblobsite.filmbuffonline.com/BlobFests/2007/BlobFest2007.htm

The anti-Obama rumor mongering hasn’t seemed to dissipate but is flying along under most peoples radar.  I keep seeing more and more people blogging about Berg v Obama, Martin v Hawaii and Donofrio v Wells with statements like, I didn’t know about this until now, and why isn’t this in the mainstream media?  

The reason is simple – there is no proof to rumors.   Circumstantial evidence does not make it fact although one of my lawyer friends could certainly come up with cases where people have been convicted only on circumstantial evidence.  We have to cite the source in lawsuits and understand the rationale and motives behind those that may seek to discrete Obama.  At the same time, we must acknowledge that it imperative to understand that we all have a vested interest in making sure that we have a President who meets all of the qualifications set forth in the Constitution- including the natural born citizen clause.    

I believe in God even tho I have never seen him/her/it.  I believe Obama’s birth certificate exists, even though I have never seen it either. But God is an entity, Obama a mere mortal, fallible like all men.  His fallibility should not come at the expense of America in not producing a verifiable, vaulted copy of his birth certificate.

The amount of circumstantial evidence has begun to add up and many more “regular” citizens who do not make a habit of wearing tin foil on there head are beginning to look again at Obama’s omissions.  From the popular No Quarter http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/10/13/updated-a-dangerous-mixture-of-lies-and-omissions-obama-ayers-wright-and-farrakhan/ to a whole list of books available at http://shop.wnd.com/store/subdept.asp?SUBDEPARTMENT_ID=131 we begin to ascertain that it is more than the fringe who have misgivings. 

Reviewing a lot of the rumors that began to surface in August 2008,  is http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/obama-did-obama-actually-register-for-selective-service/ and months later we still have unanswered questions that keep coming up.  A question arose about Obama’s registration with the Selective Service and that he may not have done so as required by law.  As Debbie Schlussel points out, “The official campaign for President may be over. But Barack Obama’s Selective Service registration card and accompanying documents show that questions about him are not only NOT over, but if the signature on the document is in fact his, our next Commander-in-Chief may have committed a federal crime in 2008, well within the statute of limitations on the matter. If it is not his, then it’s proof positive that our next Commander-in-Chief never registered with the Selective Service as required by law.  http://www.debbieschlussel.com/archives/2008/11/exclusive_did_n.html   She refers to a copy of his Registration that seems to have discrepancies.  Obama’s COLB has discrepancies and that leads us to ask for clarification once again from Obama.    

There are 29 subjects of controversy that Obama identifies on his website. http://fightthesmears.com/   TWENTY-NINE times he has felt compelled to address issues like Reverend Wright, William Ayers, Rashid Khalidi, his COLB, and to defend himself.  There is no mention regarding his Selective Service issues. 

Being so entrenched to the road to the White House and secure that all of the smears are false, Obama has apparently decided not to attend his grandmother’s funeral memorial service in Hawaii.  http://theindependentview.com/?p=353  “Hawaii residents are invited to a tribute service tomorrow for Madelyn Payne Dunham, President-elect Barack Obama’s grandmother.  Dunham, 86, died two nights before her grandson became the first African-American and the first Hawaii-born person elected President.” http://www.starbulletin.com/news/20081113_Dunham_service_set_for_tomorrow.html

I find it an odd show of respect for the woman who helped raise him, to not bother with her funeral.  I recall his statements regarding Reverend Wright , “I can no more disown him,” he told an audience in Philadelphia of his former pastor, “than I can my white grandmother — a woman who helped raise me, a woman who sacrificed again and again for me, a woman who loves me as much as she loves anything in this world, but a woman who once confessed her fear of black men who passed by her on the street, and who on more than one occasion has uttered racial or ethnic stereotypes that made me cringe.”  http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20081021/ap_on_el_pr/obama_grandmother

Obama probably doesn’t have a tin foil hat, I don’t and most people do not. People who have and wear tin foil hats may look stupid outside of Halloween, but I doubt they are.  http://tinfoilhats.newsvine.com/ has some interesting insights on recent issues, rumors, and topics in the news. 

Hats off to those seeking truth, justice and liberty for all; even if it is under an Obama administration.

Read Full Post »

I think Barry and Michele Obama would be great dinner guests.  Our kids could play together and the dogs could sniff each other while we talk of being great citizens over a glass of wine, except that it of course will never happen.  Whatever questions we might ask, surely they would be answered in the same scripted response we have come to expect from The Obama’s.  Perhaps statements like, “I plead the fifth on that issue,” or, “I’ll have to talk to my attorney” would be dominate the conversation while we ate sweet potato pie. 

Having been served with numerous lawsuits regarding his citizenship I find it the epitome of irony that neither Michelle LaVaughn Robinson Obama https://www.iardc.org/ldetail.asp?id=514560103 nor her husband, Barry Baraq Mohammad Hussein Dunham Sotero Obama, Jr https://www.iardc.org/ldetail.asp?id=318304718 are currently authorized to practice law.    Obama worked nine years at Davis Miner Barnhill & Galland, a 12-lawyer firm that specialized in helping develop low-income housing. The firm’s top partner, Allison S. Davis, was, and is, a member of the Chicago Plan Commission, appointed by Mayor Daley. Davis was also a friend of Tony Rezko. Rezko’s who was found guilty on 16/24 felony counts was denied his appeal for a new trial on Nov. 13, 2008. http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/local/chicago/chi-rezko-trial-blotternov13,0,6810451.story 

“The senator, relatively inexperienced in this kind of work, was assigned to tasks appropriate for a junior lawyer,” according to an e-mail from Obama spokesman Robert Gibbs. “These tasks would have included reviewing documents, collecting corporate organizational documents, and drafting corporate resolutions.”  http://www.suntimes.com/news/metro/353829,CST-NWS-rez23.article  I suppose that after nine years of secretarial type duties one would certainly be frustrated and pursue a political career instead.  

With cases pending in the Courts seeking to certify his eligibility, they have hired the Washington Law Firm Sandler, Reiff & Young.  One of the lawyers filing motions to dismiss was Joe Sandler, formerly the in-house council at DNC.  Maybe his name rings a bell?  Joe Sandler, esq., is also a legal representative for CAIR- Council for American Islamic Relations.  http://ahrcanum.wordpress.com/2008/10/20/sandler-vs-berg-for-obama-citizenship/

Case after case has been dismissed in all jurisdictions against Obama, with few exceptions. Most notably, Berg vs Obama and Martin vs Hawaii.  The lesser known case is Donofrio vs Nina Mitchell Wells, New Jersey Secretary of State asking her to certify Obama’s eligibility on the ballot.  http://origin.www.supremecourtus.gov/docket/08a407.htm

No. 08A407  
Title:
Leo C. Donofrio, Applicant
v.
Nina Mitchell Wells, New Jersey Secretary of State
Docketed:  
Lower Ct: Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division
  Case Nos.: (AM-0153-08T2application)
~~~Date~~~  ~~~~~~~Proceedings  and  Orders~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Nov 3 2008 Application (08A407) for stay pending the filing and disposition of a petition for a writ of certiorari, submitted to Justice Souter.
Nov 6 2008 Application (08A407) denied by Justice Souter.

Donofrio claims that SCOTUS clerk, Danny Bickell did not present his Stay Application to Justice Thomas, when it appears that he had every right to do so –”Rule 22(1) clearly states that any application addressed to a particular Justice will be filed with the clerk and transmitted promptly to the Justice in question if that Justice has authority to grant the relief being sought,” Donofrio said. “Now, while I didn’t expect Justice Souter to grant the application, Rule 22(4) states that denial of a stay allows for resubmission to a Justice of your choice, and I was ready to resubmit it to Justice Thomas.”  http://www.americasright.com/2008/11/second-eligibility-related-action.html  Donofrio’s case history and updates can be found at Donofrio’s blog http://www.blogtext.org/naturalborncitizen/topic/8700.html

Lest Attorney Andy Martin be out of the lime light, instead of focusing his energy on his own case and search for Obama’s vaulted birth certificate, has written a letter to the PA Supreme Court Disciplinary Board to to investigate the conduct of attorney Philip J. Berg. http://contrariancommentary.wordpress.com/2008/11/12/anti-obama-attorney-philip-j-berg-faces-disciplinary-complaint/  “There have been a lot of questions, and criticism, swirling around Mr. Berg’s behavior,” Martin stated. So much for mutual respect.

Berg sought to disbar and remove Justices”… on the 1st anniversary of the U.S. Supreme Court decision in Bush vs. Gore which “anointed” Bush as President writes to three (3) U.S. Supreme Court Justices, Justices O’Connor, Scalia and Thomas requesting that they agree to “Voluntary Disbarment” for failing to “recuse” themselves in said case and other violations. http://www.votermarch.org/BergPet.htm 

Another lawsuits is rumored from Vice presidential Candidate Wiley S. Drake Sr.  asking to de-certify Barack Obama because he has refused to release proof of being a Natural Born Citizen, thereby disqualifying Obama in his bid for the Office http://obambi.wordpress.com/2008/11/03/vice-presidential-candidate-wiley-s-drake-sr-to-file-in-court-asking-to-de-certify-barack-obama-because-he-has-refused-to-release-proof-of-being-a-natural-born-citizen-thereby-disqualifying-obama-i/ but I have yet to see any actual legal proceeding on the net.  

 I am proud of these Americans who continue to question President Elect Obama’s citizenship and protect our Constitution. It reminds me of Michelle Obama proclaiming that for “the first time” in her adult life,” she was proud of America, as she spoke during a rally to support her husband’s presidential bid.  http://www.bostonherald.com/news/national/politics/2008/view.bg? and http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/02/20/maybe-they-dont-want-to-change/?ex=1361250000&en=9d564dff2b7ab130&ei=5088&partner=rssnyt&emc=rss  Stan Hewitts Town Hall has the audio here http://hughhewitt.townhall.com/MediaPlayer/AudioPlayer.aspx?ContentGuid=9e3a08aa-ad84-46cf-8492-6aff289bca42 

How proud both Michelle and Barry as former attorney’s must be, to be so entrenched in Court proceedings through out the land.  In her thesis she wrote how she is determined to “utilize all of my present and future resources to benefit [the black] community first and foremost.”   http://www.suntimes.com/news/metro/221458,CST-NWS-mich21.article.

Her thesis “Princeton Educated Blacks and The Black Community” is available courtesy of  http://obamaprincetonthesis.wordpress.com/

It’s too bad the Barack family is not using all of its resources to give benefit to all Americans.  Obama himself could end the charades in showing us his official, vaulted, original birth certificate before the family, Obama’s mother-in-law, and the new dog move into the White House and he takes the Oath of Office.  Obama is not going to show anyone anything unless a court of law demands it and as I mentioned in a previous post, he can just take the fifth and not incriminate himself.  http://ahrcanum.wordpress.com/2008/11/12/obama-could-plead-the-5th-amendment-on-citizenship/

I wonder if any one will question the citizenship of the dog?

Lest anyone need reminding, “We are a government of the people, by the people, for the people.”   Abraham Lincoln in his Gettysburg Address, 1863.

Read Full Post »

I do not wear tinfoil on my head and I voted for That (Other) One.  I will have to swallow my pride and support the office when he puts his hand on the Bible [and it better not be the Koran] when taking the Oath of Presidency but, I need to know now, that I am standing behind man and a country that is being led by an honest to God, American citizen that meets the qualifications of the office regarding his citizenship status – and the U.S. Supreme Court has asked the same.  

At  http://myiq2xu.wordpress.com/2008/10/11/who-gives-a-fuck-about-obamas-birth-certificate/ the author asks, ” Who gives a f^^k about Obama’s birth certificate?” and says in the post “in regards to his birth certificate, it is not relevant to Barack Obama’s qualifications for President.”  and that “accurate answers to the questions are still none of our business.” 

It is my business and it better be everyone’s business to know the citizenship of our Presidency, I after all have standing and want accurate answers.  I fail to see how circumventing the U.S. Constitution’s clear indicators of qualification for the Office is an acceptable reason to have voted for him or support him and until such proof is offered that, beyond any reasonable doubt, in a court of law, and specifically the US Supreme Court of Law, that he is a U.S. Citizen. 

…..directly under Article II, Section 1, Clause 4 of the Constitution—to require that anyone standing for “the Office of President” must verify his eligibility for that position, at least when serious allegations have been put forward that he is not eligible, and he has otherwise refused to refute those allegations with evidence that should be readily available if he is eligible. That “Case[ ]” is one the Constitution itself defines. And the Constitution must be enforceable in such a “Case[ ]” in a timely manner, by anyone who cares to seek enforcement, because of the horrendous consequences that will ensue if it is flouted.  http://www.newswithviews.com/Vieira/edwin84.htm Edwin Viera, Jr. 

Acceptance of web pages like factcheck as providing factual information are suspect at best, especially when there Obama has ties to the Annenberg political Group with long standing ties to William Ayers.  http://www.factcheck.org/  I can write it here on the web and make official notification to the world that I am the King of my back 50, but that doesn’t make it so -although my children think it to be true.  Obama’s own web site displays his COLB- certificate of live birth but that doesn’t make it so either.  In a court of law, only physical evidence is admitted.  Thanks again to Al Gore for inventing the Internet.  rofl.

A week after the election and the silence of MSM- Main Stream Media in regard to Obama’s citizenship lawsuits is beyond reprehensible and leads one to ask, is there really freedom of the press?  In the media’s defense, if they tick off the President Elect, they will not have any more questions to ask or scoops on the Obama Administration.  At That One’s first press conference, he called on numerous media groups but failed to call on a reporter from Fox News.  Imagine that.  http://current.com/items/89510124/fox_news_snubbed_at_obama_s_first_press_conference.htm 

Neither Berg or Martin have made many headlines, let alone the case of Dr. T.B Bradley, Psy, D.,  who formally applied to the Court for leave to intervene in Case 2:08-cv-04083-RBS Document 16 filed October 7, 2008 http://nationalwriterssyndicate.com/index2.php?option=com_content&do_pdf=1&id=767  or the suit by Leo Donofrio against the New Jersey Secretary of State who “assumed” Omaba as qualified.   http://www.blogtext.org/naturalborncitizen/ It claims “To be a naturally born citizen, this is the issue.  You are either “born” one or you are not, and if not, you can’t be President.  The 14th Amendment can make one a “citizen” but not a “natural born citizen”.  This is the backbone of my case.  Had the US legislature, and the States who ratified the 14th Amendment, sought to bestow “natural born citizen” status, then the 14th Amendment would say so, but it does not.  It confers “citizen” status, and only if the person is subject to the jurisdiction of the United States. ” Find more in the UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT Docket #: 08A407. and at http://www.democratic-disaster.com//index.php?topic=286.0  He references the Movant Papers which are based on a Constitutional issue, that it is proper for the US Supreme Court to review the case http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2129827/posts and it all may end up on Justice Clarence Thomas’ lap.

Should Obama make the Presidential “Oath or Affirmation” of office in full knowledge that he is not a natural born Citizen he will have committed a crime of perjury for being ineligible for the Office -Article II, Section 1, Clause 8) since he cannot “faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States.”  “I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my Ability preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.” http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Article_Two_of_the_United_States_Constitution#Clause_6:_Vacancy_and_Disability

Besides having committed perjury it may very well be proved that he usurped the Office of Presidency which would be a criminal act under Title 18, United States Code, Section 242.  http://www.fbi.gov/hq/cid/civilrights/statutes.htm#section242  http://www.usdoj.gov/crt/crim/242fin.php  thus having deprived citizens the right to vote for whom, at the time of the election, constituencies assumed Obama had met the qualification to become President that is secured and protected by the Constitution and laws of the U.S.   Did Obama deprive me of my guaranteed right?  The Courts will tell.

Where is his birth certificate?  Here we have a President Elect that lays claim that he is going to share as much information as he can with the American people and yet, he can not share his simple birth certificate with out being forced by a court of law.  Taking it all the way to The Supreme Court, Justice Davis Souter has requested that Obama provide unmitigated proof of citizenship to the court by December 1, 2008, in the case Berg v Obama.  

So as not to incriminate himself, or the DNC who have propped him up as their candidate and in an effort to hide behind laws, I wonder if President Elect Obama will plead the 5th in a refusal to testify against himself  http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/Plead+the+Fifth and defy the U.S. Supreme Court and people like you and me who actually do “give a f^^k”.

Read Full Post »

colb1

 

09 NOVEMBER 2008: Supreme Court Of The United States (SCOTUS) Supreme Court Justice David Souter has agreed that a review of the federal lawsuit filed by attorney Phil Berg against Barack Hussein Obama II, et al., which was subsequently dismissed for lack of standing is warranted. SCOTUS Docket No. 08-570..  Berg’s petition for an injunction to stay the November 4th election was denied, but the Clerk also required the defendants to respond to the Writ of Certiorari, which I believe, requires the concurrence of four justices, by December 1, 2008. 

The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that people like me and the others who want to know the origins of Barack Obama’s citizenship are not stupid, and the Court it appears to want to see Obama’s birth certificate too.  There is nothing in the main stream media about Berg vs Obama or Martin vs Hawaii and until it is, we have remained on the fringe until being vindicated, at least a little bit.  It seems when talking about Obama’s citizenship that people don’t know a thing, they believe it is a lie or they are following the pursuits of justice to determine his eligibility.  For millions of voters, any citizenship questions they may have had were laid to rest long ago but to others, questions still remain and poignantly is, why President Elect Obama will not just show us his vaulted birth certificate? 

Groups like fact check have show us what is called a ‘re-issued’ certificate, often called by the states a certificate of live birth or a COLB.  A COLB normally passes for a birth certificate and is just as good unless questions arise. A comparison between the two documents can be found here. http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_R-l1iejogZw/SQLJZbuSVXI/AAAAAAAABKM/9B2p–yZzDw/s1600-h/Obama+COLB.jpg

Berg’s web site headlines “U. S. SUPREME COURT AWAITS RESPONSE TO BERG’S WRIT OF CERTIORARI FROM OBAMA, DNC and Co-DEFENDANTS For   For Immediate Release: – 11/07/08 http://www.obamacrimes.com/  “I look forward to receiving defendant Obama’s response to the writ and am hopeful the U. S. Supreme Court will review Berg v. Obama. I believe Mr. Obama is not a constitutionally-qualified natural-born citizen and is ineligible to assume the office of President of the United States.”

Rule 11 as noted by the Supreme Court seems to make it clear that Justice Souter’s granting of a review on the Writ of Certiorari is not a right entitled to citizen Phil Berg, but rather is a matter of judicial discretion based upon a compelling reason. The compelling reason is the Constitutional requirement that no person except a natural born citizen shall be eligible to the office of President.

As I understand it, what this means is that on or before December 1, 2008 Barack Hussein Obama must respond to the writ of certiorari.  The Berg v Obama case really is really about a whole list of 56 questions regarding Obama’s place of birth. http://quipster.wordpress.com/2008/10/11/56-questions-obama-refuses-to-answer-about-citizenship/

The Rule of 11 http://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frcp/Rule11.htm (4) the denials of factual contentions are warranted on the evidence or, if specifically so identified, are reasonably based on belief or a lack of information.  I can not imagine that as a Harvard Law Graduate and as President Elect that Obama would ignore such a request from the Justices of the Supreme Court and he will be compelled to provide a vault copy his original birth certificate.  In what is called a writ of mandamus to do so, they have absolutely no legal basis to refuse an order of the Supreme Court of the United States.

If Obama fails to do present his birth certificate, surely the Justices would be remiss in being defied.  They will then have to decide what to do about a President-elect who refuses to prove his natural-born citizenship.  Will Obama be held in contempt of court?  The Court may in fact, accept his COLB and in the long run issue a dismissal, citing that the responsibility of eligibility lies in Congress. We have already seen claims by The Federal Election Committee that it is not responsible for proof of eligibility

http://fightthesmears.com/articles/5/birthcertificate  posts his COLB but even that doesn’t’t prove even that is real, only that there is no credible evidence that it is a fake.  The raised seal and authoritative signature needed to validate the document cannot be seen on the scan http://web.israelinsider.com/Articles/Politics/12939.htm.  His campaign has a burden of proving otherwise and his website says that, “Smears claiming Barack Obama doesn’t have a birth certificate aren’t actually about that piece of paper — they’re about manipulating people into thinking Barack is not an American citizen.” Without that that little piece of paper, my friend- the fringe will not be convoluted into believing Obama is an American Citizen and that our Constitution will remain in crisis.  

While Martin has a case that is on the docket in Hawaii for November 18, 2008, there is a million dollar reward for anyone who can provide Obama’s birth certificate http://ahrcanum.wordpress.com/2008/11/09/obamas-birth-certificate-one-million-dollar-reward/ and a petition- Stop the Obama Constitutional Crisis with a reported 80,000+ signatures –the site got those signatures with out the help of ACORN!.   http://www.rallycongress.com/constitutional-qualification/1244/stop-obama-constitutional-crisis/ 

“I can see a unanimous Court (en banc) decertifying the election if Obama refuses to produce his birth certificate,” says Raymond S. Kraft, an attorney and writer. “They cannot do otherwise without abandoning all credibility as guardians of the Constitution. Even the most liberal justices, however loathe they may to do this, still consider themselves guardians of the Constitution. The Court is very jealous of its power – even over presidents, even over presidents-elect.”  Kraft is a contributor to http://www.familysecuritymatters.org/publications/id.1614/pub_detail.asp

Most citizens, including myself will support the office and pray that should Obama pass through the Electoral collage and take the Oath of Presidency that his decisions yield the best four our future.  With more than a month and a half until Obama takes that Oath, we need a rational conclusion to make a rational judgment that he is in fact eligible.  The final judgment could be be influenced by any chaos that could result from de-certifying and voiding the election.  Found wrong or right, Berg and the American people could loose, even if he is right. 

What could be so hard about that, unless you have no birth certificate to present.

Read Full Post »

$1 MM Reward 4 Obama Long-Form Birth Certificate / Video

One Million Dollar Reward Offered For Certified Obama Long-Form Birth Certificate.  Secret of the Rosary Films is offering a one million dollar reward for the certified long-form birth certificate of Barack Obama.

The long-form birth certificate must be certified by the U.S. Supreme Court.

Long form birth certificates are exact photocopies of the original birth record that was prepared by the hospital or attending physician at the time of the child’s birth.

The long form usually includes parents’ information such as address of residence, race, birth place, date of birth — and additional information on the child’s birthplace, and information on the doctors that assisted in the birth of the child. The long form also usually includes the signature of the doctor involved and at least one of the parents.

When Hawaii became a state in 1959, there were many people who resided there who did not have a birth certificate. From 1911 to 1972, in Hawaii a person — over the age of one — whose birth was not registered — could apply for a short form birth certificate in Hawaii.

Obama’s Kenyan grandmother stated he was born in Kenya. However, Obama’s mother or grandmother probably filed an affidavit stating that Obama was born in Hawaii and the state of Hawaii issued the kind of short form certificate posted on the Obama’s Web site.

This is the reason why Obama has not released a long form Hawaiian birth certificate to the courts it does not exist. “

With a one million dollar reward out there, Obama himself should present the birth certificate to the Supreme Court and claim the reward.  He could buy his children the new puppy he promised them with the reward money and it would offset the cost of caring for the dogs and their own security detail.  Of course, he would then have to pay taxes on the million, but still have enough money left for a cat for Michelle if she wanted one.  Might as well get Joe Biden a parrot too.

Read Full Post »

Obama has about two months to get up to speed for his “on the job training” to comprehend the full range of capabilities deployed by the United States. Barring any unforeseen challenges to his citizenship from Berg vs Obama or Martin vs the State of Hawaii, he will take office on January 20 and faces enormous security challenges here and abroad.  Director of National Intelligence Mike McConnell gave the President-elect the first national security briefings, which details not only threat perceptions but responses, including special operations that are currently under way in different parts of the world- conflicts and resolutions.

America has one US President at a time and Obama might need to bite his tongue when it comes to Iran, or his policies as expressed, may develop into unmitigated disaster.  The ideology of characters like Jeremiah Wright, Bill Ayers, and Frank Davis, and yesterday’s selection of Rahm Emanuel to Chief of Staff, combined make the hairs on my back stand up.  Illinois Democrat Emanuel served under Clinton and as Paul Joseph Watson notes this morning on his pick, “it is disturbing in light of the fact he is a staunch supporter of reactionary forces in Israel and his father was an Irgun terrorist.”  http://www.infowars.com/?p=5781&cp=6  Exit polls conducted nationwide show that about 78 percent of the Jewish vote was for Obama and I wonder if they are reassured that Obama’s values are similar to theirs?  I also wonder if anyone will note that Emanuel was appointed to the board of Freddie Mac?  http://hotair.com/archives/2008/11/07/emanuel-tied-to-freddie-mac-collapse/

“Barack Obama has criticized Bush for “not talking to the enemy,” particularly in Iran. So, the world would expect Obama to obey all the diplomatic traffic rules and follow all the procedures to try to persuade President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and the Iranian authorities to abandon their project to build a nuclear bomb. But when Iran refuses to give up its bomb despite the eloquent entreaties of the new American president, Obama would be forced to act. So, after talking with Iran, he would likely end up at the same spot where Bush is. That wouldn’t’t make him very popular in Iran or with others who oppose America’s use of its military might.”  said, Ayann Hirsi Ali. http://www.arabtimesonline.com/kuwaitnews/faqdetails.asp?faid=1218&faqid=9.  She also articulates that by America’s with drawl of the Middle East, we will be opening the whole area to energy hungry Chinese and to Russia to whom democracy, borders, boundaries and civil rights have little meaning. 

Iran’s naval chief Adm. Habibollah Sayyari told state radio Tuesday, Oct,.28, that their new base could be used to block the entry of any “enemy” into the Persian Gulf. Iran has warned it would close the narrow Strait of Hormuz, through which 40 percent of the world’s oil passes, if the US attacked its nuclear installations. Sources note the additional advantages of its location for Tehran are quick access to the Red Sea, Indian Ocean and Horn of Africa and support for three objectives:

1. A naval presence opposite the Gulfs of Oman and Aden, where Israeli maintains Dolphin submarines. For Tehran their presence is part of Israel’s belligerent posture opposite Iran.

2. Intensified military involvement in Sudan on the Red Sea.

3. As a counterweight for the US, NATO and Russian naval might building up off the pirate-ridden Somali coast. From Tehran, this build-up looks like a potential threat to its maritime supply lanes and oil export routes.  http://www.debka.com/headline.php?hid=5681First,

Obama must realize that negotiating with Iran will not stop its nuclear weapons program. He said he will speak with rogue state leaders like Ahmadinejad “without preconditions,” implying this is a new idea. In fact, Britain, France and Germany (“the EU-3″) have been doing exactly that for over five years. Throughout, they have been surrogates for America, and yet Iran has shown no inclination to terminate its nuclear program.  John Bolton http://www.nydailynews.com/opinions/2008/09/25/2008-09-25_a_wakeup_call_on_irans_nukes.html———-3

Buried on the back pages of the news, The Israel Insider is reporting a seismic event in southern Iran, may in fact have been a massive underground nuclear bomb test.  The USGS measured a tremor 5.0 on the Richter scale on October 25, just north of Hormuz and opposite Abu Hhabi.  A 4.8 Richter scale event happened on October 21 just 3 miles of the event on the 25th. Foreign sources have long speculated that Iran already is possession of ready nuclear bombs and are being funded by China and North Korea.  Who do you think Iran would like to bomb first?  Israel, maybe or the US?

I trust that Obama’s security briefing didn’t leave out the fact that North Korea threatened to turn South Korea into debris unless Seoul stops what it described as a policy of confrontation.  “The puppet authorities had better bear in mind that the advanced preemptive strike of our own style will reduce everything … to debris, not just setting them on fire,” the North’s military said in a statement.  “It will turn out to be a just war… to build an independent reunified state on it, http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,25197,24565063-2703,00.html.

Rand Corporation http://www.rand.org/pubs/testimonies/2008/RAND_CT304.pdf  gave testimony presented before the Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs on April 15, 2008 the impact of a nuclear target hit in Long Beach, California.  “The area of radiation contamination (approximately 500 square km) that will require long-term relocation of people and businesses is home to an estimated two million people. These people must be moved within a few days and will not be able to take most of their possessions because of the threat of contamination. Prevention efforts would benefit the country not only in the extreme case of nuclear terrorism, but would also be broadly applicable to the preparation for and response to other catastrophes such as major earthquakes and floods that could require mass evacuations for months or even years of contaminate regions.

http://www.rand.org/pubs/testimonies/2008/RAND_CT304.pdf”  Where do you think the people might be moved to?  My money is Alaska.  Who is going to move 2 million people?  The 1st Army Brigade? 

The short, 12 page document in so little words goes over what would be needed in a nuclear event or disaster hitting a city and basically says what most Americans know, we’d be screwed.  Maybe the Rex 84 Program http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rex_84 is making a comeback in 2008 under a new name, The Conflict and Revolution Document or C & R Document in preparation for a U.S. financial or nuclear demise.  The Madison Report claimed the C&R Document exists and it is circulating among Congress warning of a bleak future for America. http://www.knowthelies.com/?q=node/1307  Just maybe, C & R is what the President receives daily.

Let’s hope, That One has those big ears open and his mouth shut while he under goes the same daily briefings as The President. If the message of a C & R Document isn’t in print and doesn’t really exist, we can all see the writing on the wall anyways.

Read Full Post »

Andy Martin appears to be getting closer to the truth about Obama’s citizenship.  “(HONOLULU)(November 1, 2008) Internet powerhouse Andy Martin has ignited a firestorm in Hawai’i over Barack Obama’s bogus “original” birth certificate. Martin won a stunning victory Friday afternoon (October 31st) when the State of Hawai’i backed his assertion that there was an original, “typewritten, 1961″ birth certificate, called a “Certificate of Live Birth” or “COLB” in Hawai’i, that no one has previously seen. Hawai’i officials retrieved and examined the document after Martin filed a lawsuit seeking access to the historic 1961 original.  Obama has falsely claimed to have placed the “original” on the Internet. Factcheck.org has falsely claimed to have seen this document and posted it on the Internet; that is not true. CNN has falsely ridiculed Martin.  Hawai’i officials have now refuted Obama’s false assertion. http://www.rightsidenews.com/200811012436/editorial/state-of-hawaii-backs-andy-martin-in-obama-birth-certificate-battle.html

If That One, Barack Obama- Barry Baraq Mohammad Hussein Dunham Sottero Obama Jr. would release his vaulted birth certificate we could put an end to all of this.   

We have a government official claiming to have seen the Obama’s birth certificate violating the state of Hawaii’s own privacy laws. http://ahrcanum.wordpress.com/2008/11/01/obamas-birth-certificate-in-hawaii-certifiable-madness/ In Fact, Hawai’i Health Director Dr. Chiyome Fukino stated that it exists. 

Ahrcanum has searched for any legal documents regarding Martin’s filings that would indicate the nature of the filing, its contents and exactly whom it was filed against and in what court but I seem to suffer from CFS- Can’t Find $hit.  Hawaii court records can be found here but the system seems to be having a hic-up  http://hoohiki1.courts.state.hi.us/jud/Hoohiki/main.htm?spawn=1  so we tried  http://www.capitol.hawaii.gov/  but landed in an update on the forums at http://messageboards.aol.com/aol/en_us/articles.php?boardId=455943&articleId=701899&func=5&channel=News and finally at Andy Martin’s own website http://contrariancommentary.blogspot.com/ .  Only Andy Martins site has any reference to the suit at all and even he has no filing number or copies of the brief that was filed. 

http://www.capitol.hawaii.gov/hrscurrent/Vol06_Ch0321-0344/HRS0338/HRS_0338-0018.htm specifically spells out who can access records like birth certificates, and am surprised once again, that a government Health Department employee took it upon herself to see the vaulted records of Obama. 

Martin’s court date from his website is November 18, somewhere and some time after the election.

http://mediamatters.org/items/200810280017?f=i_related has a whole unflattering review of Anthony Martin-Trigona appearance on Hannity and Colmes on Fox New earlier this month.

Even if one is in disagreement with Andy Martin or Philip Berg, for that matter-you have to value the tenacity in trying to get to the truth of Obama’s citizenship. 

All things aside, even Martin claimed, “That determination remains to be made, and today all we have is people on all sides, from Berg to Fukino, making wild or unsubstantiated or unconfirmed or untested claims without anyone having any access to the full range of conflicting evidence.”

“This may sound too incredible for words. But what’s really incredible is that, with dozens of reporters feverishly combing Alaska for any evidence to tarnish Sarah Palin, the mainstream media has largely refused to investigate any of this.” http://www.melaniephillips.com/articles-new/?p=618

Millions of Americans will be voting for him under pretense, and pretense should never be good enough for anyone.

Post update November 21, 2008.  Andy Martin’s case on appeal was dismissed for lack of standing.  http://ahrcanum.wordpress.com/2008/11/21/obamas-birth-certificate-denied-to-andy-martin-again/

Post Update March 31, 2009-  Andy Martin is hosting National Conference on Barack Obama’s Missing Birth Certificate and College Records April 3-4.

http://www.pr-inside.com/obama-invited-to-washington-dc-birth-r1151208.htm

Read Full Post »

It has been certifiable madness that there are so many lawsuits in the courts in an effort to get Barack Obama to provide his “vault version” of his birth certificate in order to prove his eligibility to become President.  Instead, we the public are shown a fraudulent birth certificate (short version)- a certificate of live birth,  that was deemed credible by factcheck.org (which by the way, is funded by the Anneneburg Foundation–the board Obama sat on for years with William Ayers of–no conflict of interest there!). Instead of making the lawsuits go away instantly by providing the vault version of his birth certificate, he has refused to do so. Wouldn’t logic dictate to provide it and the lawsuit would go away?  Instead, we have a Democrat, Philip J. Berg, Esq., http://www.obamacrimes.com/ petitioning the U.S. Supreme Court for a ruling on whether his, case Berg vs Obama, et al has standing, and requests that the entire Presidential Election not occur on November 4. Berg vs Obama No. 08-cv-04083. http://dockets.justia.com/docket/court-paedce/case_no-2:2008cv04083/case_id-281573/

Yesterday it seems that privacy laws were broken in Hawaii.   “Hawaii Health Department spokeswoman Janice Okubo told the Tribune state privacy laws and attorney general guidance barred her from confirming the certificate’s authenticity. But, “It looks exactly the same as my own birth certificate,” Okubo said.”  HOW DOES OKUBO KNOW WHAT IT LOOKS LIKE?  http://www.upi.com/Top_News/2008/10/30/Rumor_questions_Obamas_birth_certificate/UPI-64261225393575/  Hiding for months behind privacy laws and legal wrangling, the Health Department Director Dr. Chiyome Fukino has refused to issue a copy of his vaulted birth certificate.  Then, just in time for Halloween trick and treats we have Fukino saying in a report from Associated Press:  “HONOLULU (AP) – State officials say there’s no doubt Barack Obama was born in Hawaii.  Health Department Director Dr. Chiyome Fukino says she and the registrar of vital statistics, Alvin Onaka, have personally verified that the health department holds Obama’s original birth certificate. Fukino says that no state official, including Gov. Linda Lingle, ever instructed that Obama’s certificate be handled differently from any other.  She says state law bars release of a certified birth certificate to anyone who does not have a tangible interest in it.” http://www.khnl.com/Global/story.asp?S=9275581  “State law (Hawai’i Revised Statutes §338-18) prohibits the release of a certified birth certificate to persons who do not have a tangible interest in the vital record,” said DOH Director Chiyome Fukino. “Therefore, I as Director of Health for the State of Hawai’i, along with the Registrar of Vital Statistics who has statutory authority to oversee and maintain these type of vital records, have personally seen and verified that the Hawai’i State Department of Health has Sen. Obama’s original birth certificate on record in accordance with state policies and procedures.”

In a complete head spinning act like the girl from the movie The Exorcist, she makes a statement that not only has she seen Obama’s birth certificate, but that it is authentic and he was in fact born in Hawaii.  Well, that’s a bunch of vomit.  This is the woman who once said,        “All of the evidence that we have says that the beaches are as safe now as they were before the sewage spill.” http://thinkexist.com/quotes/dr._chiyome_fukino/  Seeing that she is so well versed in crap, we are expected to believe that she got off her high horse and broke the law to peer into a sealed document that is protected by her own state of Hawaii’s laws on privacy?

Governor Lingle, clearly has indicated that Obama’s birth certificate not be handled any differently, yet we see a government employee doing just that and breaking the law.  Why now, after months of legal filings has she decided to come forward to admit that she has seen That One’s birth certificate?  When did she see it?  Under who’s authority did she act?  Why is spokesperson Janice Okubo claiming to have knowledge of what Obama’s birth certificate looks like.  If Okubo, a lowly employee got a glimpse of Obama’s birth certificate, at the very least there must be others who may also attest to its content. 

Perhaps Obama should sue in the state of Hawaii since it is obvious that a crime was committed against him by Hawaii’s own Health Department in releasing an opinion, opening a sealed document, and blatantly violating Obama’s own right to privacy.  Had the Hawaii Health Department claimed that Obama was in fact born some where else than Hawaii, the outcome would have serious repercussions on the election and immediate actions would be taken, most certainly in a court of law.  I do not believe that any Court in the land would accept testimony in place of the presentation of an actual document which is easily accessible to an expert witness.  Obama, before he became a politician was a graduate of the Harvard School of Law, and would certainly have never accepted a statement from an expert witness when there is documentation available.

Further implications and a nice write up of her statements are made at http://michaelpatrickleahy.blogspot.com/2008/10/show-us-birth-certificate-hawaii.html

Until Obama himself releases the authentic, vaulted birth certificate, this will not go away, nor should it.  The debate rages on as to who has standing to enforce the rules of eligibility, and in an effort to protect anyone from taking the Office of The President of The United States who is not a citizen, we the people need to see our nominees birth certificates and not take just take someone’s word for it.

America needs to move past this and Obama needs to once and for all release his own birth certificate.  While Obama is in full disclosure mode, he should at the very least make a statement about the dinner he attended for Khalidi with his wife and William Ayers.  

If I were to make public these tapes, containing blunt and candid remarks on many different subjects, the confidentiality of the office of the president would always be suspect.
Richard M. Nixon

Read Full Post »

In the matter of Berg vs Obama, questioning Obama’s citizenship and eligibility to be President, Berg has appealed all the way to the Supreme Court and we are awaiting a ruling which may take until hell freezes over.  None the less, no facts were ruled valid or invalid as they have not been heard. In all these filings the FEC – Federal Election Committee is named along with Obama and rightfully so the FEC made a special filing to the Court requesting relief from the claim since the dismissal of the case not apparently mention them specifically from being dismissed. 

DEFENDANT FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION’S MOTION TO DISMISS FOR LACK OF SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 12(b)(1)

Defendant Federal Election Commission (“FEC” or “Commission”) moves to dismiss the Complaint in this matter pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1) for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Plaintiff’s Complaint does not present an Article III case or controversy because plaintiff lacks standing to raise the issue of a candidate’s constitutional eligibility. Moreover, even if Berg had standing to raise the constitutional eligibility issue, the Commission should be dismissed as a party to this case because it has no oversight over the Constitution’s Presidential Qualifications Clause.

 

The FEC claims it has no oversight in the Constitutions Presidential Election Qualifications clause. 

WHAT, NO OVERSIGHT?  Go and read the brief the FEC filed for yourself and see that the FEC is not in charge of eligibility.  Who the frig is in charge of election qualifications? 

The history of the Berg filings.  http://dockets.justia.com/docket/court-paedce/case_no-2:2008cv04083/case_id-281573/

http://obamacrimes.com/index.php/component/content/article/2-news/49-press-release-10-30-2008-berg-filing-injunction-to-stay-presidential-election

Incidentally Judge Surrick on  wrote “AND NOW, this 27th day of October, 2008, having dismissed Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief, it is ORDERED that all pending motions are DISMISSED as moot. IT IS SO ORDERED.BY THE COURT:/s/ R. Barclay Surrick, Judge.

According to Mr Berg, he has filed two documents:

  1. Application for an Immediate Injunction to Stay the Presidential Election of November 4, 2008; and
  2. Petition for Writ of Certiorari. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Certiorari

 

http://www.fec.gov/ If the Federal Government can’t policy itself to have over sight in Federal Elections, who does?

Read Full Post »

I am convinced that Barry Baraq Mohammed Hussein Dunham Sottero Obama Jr., is not a natural born citizen as required by the U.S. Constitution to be President.  If Obama wins the election as most polls predict, Obama will be an Unconstitutional President the second he raises his right hand to God or Allah and takes the Presidential Oath of Office.

In the opinion of groups like Family Security Matters, “unless Obama can produce an authentic birth certificate proving that he is a “natural born citizen,” then every Democrat member of Congress, every person managing Obama’s campaign, every officer and director of the Democrat National Committee, and every person who has ever taken an oath to “support and defend” the Constitution and is now supporting an Unconstitutional candidate for president, has participated in a vast left-wing conspiracy to defraud millions of Democrats out of hundreds of millions of dollars to elect an Unconstitutional President.” http://familysecuritymatters.org/docLib/20080805_VoterGuide_Aug_4_2008CATOKvf1.pdf

In concealing the whereabouts of his birth, Obama so far has succeeded in dodging the most fundamental requirement of eligibility as President.  Numerous legal proceeding have been filed against Obama to provide proof of his citizenship but most cases have been quick in responding with motions to dismiss further allowing That One to continue to perpetrate fraud on the American people.  Berg vs Obama was dismissed by the US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania last week, for lack of standing, he has appealed to the Supreme Court. No facts were ruled valid or invalid as they have not been heard.  Berg and all citizens of The USA must query the authority of Judge Surrick’s District Court’s decision and the eligibility of Obama’s citizenship.  Berg commented:

“This is a question of who has standing to uphold our Constitution. If I don’t have standing, if you don’t have standing, if your neighbor doesn’t have standing to question the eligibility of an individual to be President of the United States – the Commander-in-Chief, the most powerful person in the world – then who does?”

Summarily, “Berg’s suit sought to present evidence that Obama may have been born in Kenya, where under the law at the time, his mother (a U.S. citizen) would have had to have been 19 years old to have conferred her citizenship to him.  (Obama ACKNOWLEDGES dual citizenship with Kenya on his website https://donate.barackobama.com/page/contribute/splashmagnet_octexp).  Berg also sought to produce evidence that Obama later held Indonesian citizenship when he was adopted by Lolo Soetoro and moved with him to Indonesia.  Indonesia and the U.S. did not recognize dual citizenship at the time, so the only valid citizenship he would have held in that case is Indonesian.  He would have expatriated any U.S. or other citizenship held.”  http://www.chronwatch-america.com/articles/3830/1/Berg-vs-Obama-Headed-for-Supreme-Court/Page1.html  Even if he subsequently regained U.S. citizenship, it would be thru naturalization, which is expressly ineligible to serve as President of the United States under Article II of the Constitution! 

Berg v. Obama No. 08-cv-04083. can be followed here. 


 http://dockets.justia.com/docket/court-paedce/case_no-2:2008cv04083/case_id-281573/

 http://www.supremecourtus.gov/ http://www.scotuswiki.com/index.php?title=Main_Page 

http://obamacrimes.com/index.php/component/content/article/2-news/49-press-release-10-30-2008-berg-filing-injunction-to-stay-presidential-election further explains his appeal to the Supreme Court here. 

The Supreme Court is a busy place and .  But remember: On November 4, we vote for electors, who then vote on December 15 for the President.
Technically, there’s still time, though time is of the essence.  The Electoral College consists of 538 popularly elected representatives who formally select the President and Vice President.  In 2008, it will make the selection on December 15.  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electoral_College_(United_States). 

Perhaps the October Surprise will come in time for Christmas.

Thy will be done, let justice be served

Read Full Post »

« Newer Posts

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,715 other followers